Reply With QuoteGuno צְבִי (07-20-2018)
Verified User
Appalachian whites, oh wait, they can't, their ghetto requires handouts too.Originally Posted by CFM
Guno צְבִי (07-20-2018)
Verified User
While you advocate leaving that not in the hands of the public via a representative democracy, but rather leave those decisions to the aristocracy and the corporate state. I don't see much of difference really.
Never Again
When the war on poverty and the programs were rolled out the American people supported it because it had a white Appalachian face, when black faces were included , the crackas went nuts
“If we have to have a choice between being dead and pitied, and being alive with a bad image, we’d rather be alive and have the bad image.”
— Golda Meir
Zionism is the movement for the self-determination and statehood for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland, the land of Israel.
“If Hamas put down their weapons, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons, there would be no Israel."
ברוך השם
Never Again
Pap always made it a point to acknowledge.....the obvious, "THE SMELLER IS ALWAYS THE FELLER"..... in layman's term "He who smelt it dealt it". The left always attacks the thing they fear the most. In this case....its obvious, the left FEARS white evangelicals.What you should be fearing as a warmongering left wing secular humanist...….is not White Evangelical Christians.....but one of the most religious and faithful cultures on earth. Latin Americans. What...…. are you attempting to propagate the false premise that Latin America is best represented by Gangs like MS 13, Gun runners, kidnappers, drug dealers...etc.?
If not.....just why should White Christians Fear Brown, Black, Red, Yellow, or any other color culture of humanity that examples religion? The truth of the matter is the fact that those of a Religious nature far outnumber the human seculars around the globe....where 8 out of every 10 people identify as being part of some religious movement. Snowflake logic
“If we have to have a choice between being dead and pitied, and being alive with a bad image, we’d rather be alive and have the bad image.”
— Golda Meir
Zionism is the movement for the self-determination and statehood for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland, the land of Israel.
“If Hamas put down their weapons, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons, there would be no Israel."
ברוך השם
Verified User
Do I twist Jefferson, and Madison, words on equality too? Or is it your lack of knowledge, and understanding, that is the problem? Of course, to you with your "vastly superior"mind actually believes your own garbage:
https://www.economist.com/lexingtons...ke-it-with-you
"If there was one thing the Revolutionary generation agreed on — and those guys who dress up like them at Tea Party conventions most definitely do not — it was the incompatibility of democracy and inherited wealth.
With Thomas Jefferson taking the lead in the Virginia legislature in 1777, every Revolutionary state government abolished the laws of primogeniture and entail that had served to perpetuate the concentration of inherited property. Jefferson cited Adam Smith, the hero of free market capitalists everywhere, as the source of his conviction that (as Smith wrote, and Jefferson closely echoed in his own words), "A power to dispose of estates for ever is manifestly absurd. The earth and the fulness of it belongs to every generation, and the preceding one can have no right to bind it up from posterity. Such extension of property is quite unnatural." Smith said: "There is no point more difficult to account for than the right we conceive men to have to dispose of their goods after death."
The states left no doubt that in taking this step they were giving expression to a basic and widely shared philosophical belief that equality of citizenship was impossible in a nation where inequality of wealth remained the rule. North Carolina's 1784 statute explained that by keeping large estates together for succeeding generations, the old system had served "only to raise the wealth and importance of particular families and individuals, giving them an unequal and undue influence in a republic" and promoting "contention and injustice." Abolishing aristocratic forms of inheritance would by contrast "tend to promote that equality of property which is of the spirit and principle of a genuine republic."
Others wanted to go much further; Thomas Paine, like Smith and Jefferson, made much of the idea that landed property itself was an affront to the natural right of each generation to the usufruct of the earth, and proposed a "ground rent" — in fact an inheritance tax — on property at the time it is conveyed at death, with the money so collected to be distributed to all citizens at age 21, "as a compensation in part, for the loss of his or her natural inheritance, by the introduction of the system of landed property."
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
Banned
Apparently 1 in every 3 1/2 blacks can't afford to feed themselves or their children.
Banned
Since I don't support social welfare programs, I support leaving it up to the individual doing the giving. If you want to personally give a certain amount, I won't tell you who to help or how much to help those you choose to help. All I ask is the same in return.
Banned
In other words you support freeloaders who neither have the ability nor desire to earn their way getting something as a result of taking it from those that do have the ability and desire to earn it. At least be honest that you favor freeloaders and hate those that contribute to society.Do I twist Jefferson, and Madison, words on equality too? Or is it your lack of knowledge, and understanding, that is the problem? Of course, to you with your "vastly superior"
https://www.economist.com/lexingtons...ke-it-with-you
"If there was one thing the Revolutionary generation agreed on — and those guys who dress up like them at Tea Party conventions most definitely do not — it was the incompatibility of democracy and inherited wealth.
With Thomas Jefferson taking the lead in the Virginia legislature in 1777, every Revolutionary state government abolished the laws of primogeniture and entail that had served to perpetuate the concentration of inherited property. Jefferson cited Adam Smith, the hero of free market capitalists everywhere, as the source of his conviction that (as Smith wrote, and Jefferson closely echoed in his own words), "A power to dispose of estates for ever is manifestly absurd. The earth and the fulness of it belongs to every generation, and the preceding one can have no right to bind it up from posterity. Such extension of property is quite unnatural." Smith said: "There is no point more difficult to account for than the right we conceive men to have to dispose of their goods after death."
The states left no doubt that in taking this step they were giving expression to a basic and widely shared philosophical belief that equality of citizenship was impossible in a nation where inequality of wealth remained the rule. North Carolina's 1784 statute explained that by keeping large estates together for succeeding generations, the old system had served "only to raise the wealth and importance of particular families and individuals, giving them an unequal and undue influence in a republic" and promoting "contention and injustice." Abolishing aristocratic forms of inheritance would by contrast "tend to promote that equality of property which is of the spirit and principle of a genuine republic."
Others wanted to go much further; Thomas Paine, like Smith and Jefferson, made much of the idea that landed property itself was an affront to the natural right of each generation to the usufruct of the earth, and proposed a "ground rent" — in fact an inheritance tax — on property at the time it is conveyed at death, with the money so collected to be distributed to all citizens at age 21, "as a compensation in part, for the loss of his or her natural inheritance, by the introduction of the system of landed property."
For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat. - 2 Thessalonians 3:10
Banned
You, and the rest like you, don't seem to grasp that when you show facts like 1 in every 3 1/2 blacks uses food stamps, you all it racism. Why it is when data is provided, you ignore it if you don't like it?
Still your WHITE superior.
Verified User
Democrats applaud as we lose our culture.
Verified User
Half your exceptional nation lives in or at the poverty level son, it's a failed system. Black folk didn't do that. Ya'll did. And the banjo is an African instrument, you may as well be a rapper.
Verified User
You have all the culture you ever had son, you're just now finally discovering you're not in the club either.
Verified User
Doesn't look like it to me.
12124197_G.jpg
Verified User
CFM knows.
Verified User
The rules at the club have changed, I no longer want to be a member.
Posting Rules
Bookmarks