Sure you did. You didn't say what Alabama actively did to go from #5 to #4. You admitted it was due solely to someone else losing.
Apparently not with Alabama. They lost their last regular season game late in the season and it didn't hurt them.
Sorry, you've already admitted your biased which invalidates any claim that involves an unbiased opinion.
Not at all. Every team in the playoffs had a loss. If Wisconsin hadn't lost to Ohio State in the conference championship, they would have been undefeated. That would have put them at the top of the playoff roster. If any of the other top ranked teams hadn't lost games, they would have been in the playoff, pushing others down the roster.
auburn was ranked #2 in the Week 13 CFP poll. If they hadn't lost to GA in the SEC Championship game, they would have been in the playoff.
Alabama did have to DO something. They won all but one of their games. The playoff selection committee decided they were the 4th best team in the country.
If you have an issue with Bama being in the playoffs over a team that lost 2 games, take it up with the selection committee.
Didn't have to win a single game after the end of the regular season. Correct.
The requirements for the college football playoffs do not include winning a conference championship.
The CFP selection committee chose the ranked team with the fewest losses (and none to an unranked team).
Which means you agree Alabama had to do nothing to overcome what you said was worse later in the season. You argue a point then run from it when your bias gets in the way.
Apparently you think the only thing that should be considered is win/losses. Next post it will be something else.
Face it, you and the selection committee must like swallowing Saban's cum. You've shown your willingness to do so.
Hurts is an appropriate name for the washed up, so called legend. It must hurt to know that despite his claim that he was made for stuff like this, he was replaced just a few weeks later never to make a contribution again. My advice is he transfer to a Division II or III school. He might get playing time there.
I said losses late have a greater effect than losses early. Bama lost to a ranked team and dropped to #5. The #1 team had a loss early to an unranked team. My point stands.
I have never said that only wins & losses should be considered. You simply take anything I say and try to warp it.
Your fondness for talking about sucking and swallowing cum betrays your innate desires. I am a fan. You are a faggot. That is obvious.
Bama made the playoffs and won the National Championship. All your hating doesn't change a damn thing.
Apparently not since Alabama lost the last game of the regular season, didn't play again, yet benefited from doing nothing. Your point is invalid when evidence refutes it.
Yet your argument on the last post centered around wins and losses. Apparently it depends on the committee sucking Saban's dick or vice versa.
Your willingness to suck dick on behalf of Alabama, something you've admitted to doing by saying you are biased, proves your viewpoint is meaningless.
Hopefully one or more of the A/M players will be willing to take a penalty and ejection on a vicious pass rush.
You call me a faggot but I did with your wife before she died what she told me she stopped doing with you years ago. Nothing you can do about it.
You think an opinion after claiming to be biased amounts to something valid. You're a miserable little faggot that's willing to suck dick to support your team. That's a true fan.
Not being man enough to keep your bitch from sharing her goods means you're not a man. Again, nothing you can do about now, can you?
Bookmarks