Looks like Mueller is now up to 32 indictments,

[archives]

"The Justice Department announced indictments in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election against 12 Russian nationals and accused of them of engaging in a “sustained effort to hack into the computer networks” of the DCCC, the DNC and “the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton and release that information on the internet under the names DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0 and through another entity.”

"All 12 defendants are members of the GRU, a Russian federation intelligence agency within the main intelligence directorate of the Russian military, who were acting in “their official capacities.”

https://fox2now.com/2018/07/13/12-ru...6-us-election/

Doesn't establish "collusion," a term even Strzok yesterday had to define for the House lackeys, but it sure as hell raises the question if a Presidential candidate encouraged a nation antagonistic toward America to actually practice espionage within the US



Who does Trump meet on Monday?

[dukkha]

lol...all based on Crowdstrike DNC forensics?? what a joke.

Cybersecurity Firm That Attributed DNC Hacks to Russia May Have Fabricated Russia Hacking in Ukraine
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03...ng-in-ukraine/
The cyber security firm outsourced by the Democratic National Committee, CrowdStrike, reportedly misread data, falsely attributing a hacking in Ukraine to the Russians in December 2016. Voice of America, a US Government funded media outlet, reported, “the CrowdStrike report, released in December, asserted that Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app, resulting in heavy losses of howitzers in Ukraine’s war with Russian-backed separatists. But the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) told VOA that CrowdStrike erroneously used IISS data as proof of the intrusion. IISS disavowed any connection to the CrowdStrike report.

Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense also has claimed combat losses and hacking never happened.” The maker of the military app allegedly hacked called CrowdStrike’s report “delusional,” and told VOA that CrowdStrike never contacted him either before or after they completed their report. VOA News noted Ukraine’s rebuttal to CrowdStrike received little media attention as CrowdStrike’s report was widely cited in media outlets throughout the United States as further evidence of Russia hacking the United States. Alperovitch, who gave several interviews on CrowdStrike’s initial report to the Washington Post and other media outlets, refused to comment on VOA News’ report.

The report sheds further skepticism on CrowdStrike’s findings and objectivity in their conclusions, which several cyber security experts and former CIA and NSA officials have cast doubt on, especially given that several media outlets reported in early January 2017 that the DNC never allowed the FBI to examine their servers themselves, rather the FBI relied on forensic data gathered by CrowdStrike.

The investigation methods used to come to the conclusion that the Russian Government led the hacks of the DNC, Clinton Campaign Chair John Podesta, and the DCCC were further called into question by a recent BuzzFeed report by Jason Leopold, who has developed a notable reputation from leading several non-partisan Freedom of Information Act lawsuits for investigative journalism purposes. On March 15 that the Department of Homeland Security released just two heavily redacted pages of unclassified information in response to an FOIA request for definitive evidence of Russian election interference allegations. Leopold wrote, “what the agency turned over to us and Ryan Shapiro, a PhD candidate at MIT and a research affiliate at Harvard University, is truly bizarre: a two-page intelligence assessment of the incident, dated Aug. 22, 2016, that contains information DHS culled from the internet. It’s all unclassified — yet DHS covered nearly everything in wide swaths of black ink. Why? Not because it would threaten national security, but because it would reveal the methods DHS uses to gather intelligence, methods that may amount to little more than using Google.”

In lieu of substantive evidence provided to the public that the alleged hacks which led to Wikileaks releases of DNC and Clinton Campaign Manager John Podesta’s emails were orchestrated by the Russian Government, CrowdStrike’s bias has been cited as undependable in its own assessment, in addition to its skeptical methods and conclusions. The firm’s CTO and co-founder, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a think tank with openly anti-Russian sentiments that is funded by Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, who also happened to donate at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation.

In 2013, the Atlantic Council awarded Hillary Clinton it’s Distinguished International Leadership Award. In 2014, the Atlantic Council hosted one of several events with former Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who took over after pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych was ousted in early 2014, who now lives in exile in Russia.

In August, Politico reported that Donald Trump’s favorable rhetoric to Russia was concerning Ukraine, who have been recovering from Russian interference in their own country’s revolution. The article cited, “Russia wants Trump for U.S. president; Ukraine is terrified by Trump and prefers Hillary Clinton.” Trump recently appointed Atlantic Council Chairman Jon Huntsman as U.S. Ambassador to Russia, which Vox called a “baffling” choice, and Democrats and anti-Russian hysterics haven’t bothered to attempt to criticize, scrutinize or insinuate ties between Huntsman and Russia.

Cyber security expert Jeffrey Carr called the FBI/Department of Homeland Security Report, the only alleged evidence released by intelligence officials, released in late December 2016 a “fatally flawed effort” that provided no evidence to substantiate the claims that the Russian government conducted the hacks, though that’s what it was purported to do.

[volsrock]

"The Justice Department announced indictments in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election against 12 Russian nationals and accused of them of engaging in a “sustained effort to hack into the computer networks” of the DCCC, the DNC and “the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton and release that information on the internet under the names DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0 and through another entity.”

"All 12 defendants are members of the GRU, a Russian federation intelligence agency within the main intelligence directorate of the Russian military, who were acting in “their official capacities.”

https://fox2now.com/2018/07/13/12-ru...6-us-election/

Doesn't establish "collusion," a term even Strzok yesterday had to define for the House lackeys, but it sure as hell raises the question if a Presidential candidate encouraged a nation antagonistic toward America to actually practice espionage within the US


Who does Trump meet on Monday?

He meets with the guy that hacked under Obama's nose, but I think Obama told him to "cut it out"...LOL



Cut it out or else...LOL what a GD idiot!

[Jarod]

Quite a witch hunt!

[archives]

lol...all based on Crowdstrike DNC forensics?? what a joke.
.

Show us with documentation that any of the Justice Dept's indictments just released are "based on Crowdstrike"

[archives]

He meets with the guy that hacked under Obama's nose, but I think Obama told him to "cut it out"...LOL

What in the hell are you talking about?

Mueller adds twelve more indictments and your obsessed with Obama "whataboutism?"

[Jarod]

Much more efficient than the 5 year Benghazi probe and the Whitewater investigation.

[volsrock]

What in the hell are you talking about?

Mueller adds twelve more indictments and your obsessed with Obama "whataboutism?"

Obama told him to cut it out!

[cancel2 2022]

Quite a witch hunt!

Very convenient to indict Russians who will never be prosecuted.

[cancel2 2022]

Much more efficient than the 5 year Benghazi probe and the Whitewater investigation.

Yes lawyers just love to fill their boots, you're all avaricious bastards.

[cancel2 2022]

What in the hell are you talking about?

Mueller adds twelve more indictments and your obsessed with Obama "whataboutism?"

So when is the trial, will it be in Moscow?

[volsrock]

So when is the trial, will it be in Moscow?

Wonder how much their bond will be? Lol

[Guno צְבִי]

meanwhile in manafort land since he is now in a jail in general population

https://i.gifer.com/7mR0.gif

bet the others indicted will be talking very fast to the feds

[Sailor]

"The Justice Department announced indictments in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election against 12 Russian nationals and accused of them of engaging in a “sustained effort to hack into the computer networks” of the DCCC, the DNC and “the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton and release that information on the internet under the names DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0 and through another entity.”

"All 12 defendants are members of the GRU, a Russian federation intelligence agency within the main intelligence directorate of the Russian military, who were acting in “their official capacities.”

https://fox2now.com/2018/07/13/12-ru...6-us-election/

Doesn't establish "collusion," a term even Strzok yesterday had to define for the House lackeys, but it sure as hell raises the question if a Presidential candidate encouraged a nation antagonistic toward America to actually practice espionage within the US



Who does Trump meet on Monday?

Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnndddddddddddddddddddddd ddddddddddd, still no charges of collusion.This is becoming amusing.

[Darth Omar]

Much more efficient than the 5 year Benghazi probe and the Whitewater investigation.

But they were restricted to US citizens lol.