No melting of any ice is irreversible, not even the ice in your drink.
Not enough ice, even it did melt. (It isn't melting)
There is no 'tipping point'. Unstable systems would have triggered long ago.
Why is NASA studying a glacier??? Why are they even talking about a glacier???
Glaciers flow into the sea dumbass.
Insufficient ice.
There is nothing 'stable' or 'unstable' about any glacier. They are simply flowing ice.
Argument from randU fallacy. It is not possible to measure the volume of ice in a glacier.
Argument from randU fallacy. It is not possible to measure the volume of ice in a glacier.
There is very little ice in the interior. Antarctica is one of the driest places on Earth.
A single site does not indicate anything else other than that site.
The UK Guardian is just a liberal rag. It is not a valid reference. It is fake news.
Bookmarks