Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 151 to 159 of 159

Thread: Your president will select a supreme count judge on one issue.

  1. #151 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,917
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,832 Times in 17,264 Posts
    Groans
    5,348
    Groaned 4,600 Times in 4,277 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Take your medicine and accept you can do nothing about Kavanaugh being confirmed.

    It will improve your mental state.

    Now go pray that RBG doesn’t die
    The Repubs need every one of those communist , plutocrat , Putin loving Repubs to vote for him. Two of them are not pro-birthers.

  2. #152 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,917
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,832 Times in 17,264 Posts
    Groans
    5,348
    Groaned 4,600 Times in 4,277 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
    Try again Comrade.

    Grand Inquisitor Mewler-Torquemada blew his load on Manafort. While the Inquisition persecutes Manafort for acts perpetrated in the 2002-2008 timeframe, Torquemada has been forced to admit that this has nothing to do with Trump.

    FURTHER, at some point the Inquisition is going to have to explain how throwing Paul Manafort in a deep dungeon and torturing him while completely ignoring his two business partners, John and Tony Podesta.

    It's as if two men go in and hold up a liquor store, but at trial the judge turns to one man and says "I see that you're a party member, you're free to go." then turns to the other and says "you're an enemy of the party, life in prison - no parole"

    Look, I get that you Stalinist democrats are not only cool with this, but have worked for decades to pervert the system of jurisprudence to this degree. The whole "some animals are more equal than others" (it's a literary reference, you wouldn't understand) is a cornerstone of the Marxist democrats, but Hillary lost. We still have a Constitution, we still have 14th Amendment guarantees of equal protection under the law.

    Trump won, the democrat plan to end the Constitution and establish a socialist dictatorship is on hold. This idea that we let the Inquisition run wild and shit all over civil rights can only be tolerated so far.

    Want to throw Manafort in jail? Fine, he is undoubtedly guilty. Want to let Podesta walk free for the same crime because he is a loyal party operative? Bullshit. This idea you Stalinists have of one law for commoners and a VERY different law for party members doesn't cut it.

    Same crime gets the same time - Torquemada might be the Grand Inquisitor, but he is not god. With another pro-Constitution SCOTUS justice, there is zero chance of you getting away with it.

    The Inquisition will burn Manafort at the stake to squeals of delight from you apparatchiks. But it cannot stand, you do not have the power to subvert the Constitution as you desire, you lost.
    What crap. manafort had a private cell, bigger than anyone else. he had computer access, a phone. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...nsel-says.html Repubs have all 3 branches of governments and somehow yoyu think they are running the show? WTF.

  3. #153 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,319
    Thanks
    13,309
    Thanked 40,976 Times in 32,291 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Obama did not.
    I know......that was so cool......

  4. #154 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,319
    Thanks
    13,309
    Thanked 40,976 Times in 32,291 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    I know we will have a far right, Trump sycophant who will take orders from Daffy himself. This is horrible because Trump has no base of knowledge, so he outsourced the Supreme Court choice to a far-right organization funded by plutocrats. This is again unique to Trumpy.
    and so far two excellent choices......I can't wait for the third......

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (07-14-2018)

  6. #155 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    The Repubs need every one of those communist , plutocrat , Putin loving Repubs to vote for him. Two of them are not pro-birthers.
    A couple of things I would like to educate you on

    1) Two of those Senators (Murkowski and Collins) have already voted once to confirm Kavanaugh to his current seat. Something colossal would have to come out during the confirmation hearings for them to plausibly say they are voting against him
    2) While I don't think it would happen, I would not be surprised to see Flake and Corker vote against him as a big fuck you to Trump. Same with McCain

    3) But, we have three to four democrats in states that Trump won BIGLY in the Presidential election that are fighting for their political lives to win re-election

    Do you think Manchin will stay in line with Schumer? A vote against Kavanaugh will assure a Manchin loss. Same with Heidtkamp and Donnelly.

  7. #156 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    34,372
    Thanks
    3,504
    Thanked 11,634 Times in 9,300 Posts
    Groans
    632
    Groaned 1,405 Times in 1,371 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    No bigger coward than a blue dog Democrat

  8. #157 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,917
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,832 Times in 17,264 Posts
    Groans
    5,348
    Groaned 4,600 Times in 4,277 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    A couple of things I would like to educate you on

    1) Two of those Senators (Murkowski and Collins) have already voted once to confirm Kavanaugh to his current seat. Something colossal would have to come out during the confirmation hearings for them to plausibly say they are voting against him
    2) While I don't think it would happen, I would not be surprised to see Flake and Corker vote against him as a big fuck you to Trump. Same with McCain

    3) But, we have three to four democrats in states that Trump won BIGLY in the Presidential election that are fighting for their political lives to win re-election

    Do you think Manchin will stay in line with Schumer? A vote against Kavanaugh will assure a Manchin loss. Same with Heidtkamp and Donnelly.
    Let's educate you. The Supremes are quite different than lower courts. The court is closely divided and this pro corporate, anti worker,pro birther, believer in an imperial presidencty could have profound effects on the country for a long time. He is dangerous and bad choice. However the 2 female Repub senators are pro Roe v Wade rights. That is a big deal to them.

    No, nothing assures a loss or a victory. They may be able to vote their consciences and win theit seats.

  9. #158 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Let's educate you. The Supremes are quite different than lower courts. The court is closely divided and this pro corporate, anti worker,pro birther, believer in an imperial presidencty could have profound effects on the country for a long time. He is dangerous and bad choice. However the 2 female Repub senators are pro Roe v Wade rights. That is a big deal to them.

    No, nothing assures a loss or a victory. They may be able to vote their consciences and win theit seats.
    Shit I hope the left takes him down. He is a good pick but not far enough right for me.

    Plus the democrats would lose a lot of seats and give the right something to turn out for in November. So do your worst. Take your best shot.

  10. #159 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,319
    Thanks
    13,309
    Thanked 40,976 Times in 32,291 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    . The court is closely divided and this pro corporate, anti worker,pro birther, believer in an imperial presidencty could have profound effects on the country for a long time.
    better and better........

Similar Threads

  1. How should we select the president?
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-03-2016, 12:02 PM
  2. Supreme Court agrees to write law deciding transgender bathroom issue
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-29-2016, 05:09 PM
  3. Supreme Court: Judge can't rule on case
    By Legion Troll in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-09-2016, 12:26 PM
  4. Trump on what kind of Supreme Court justice he would select
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 09:10 AM
  5. judge will issue subpeona for Trayvon records
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-22-2012, 11:27 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •