Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: "FBI hands House GOP thousands of documents on Russia probe"

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    I repeat, show us the anywhere in the authorizing memorandum where the word "collusion" is mentioned, it is not in "Section b 1"

    You can try again if you like
    What do you think that section is about? Do you really believe it is not about collusion?

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    it's about fvcking time. It only took the threat of impeaching Rosenweasel to get them for Congressional oversight.

    Now lets see how badly they are redacted - DoJ pull stunts like this to "comply " with subpoenas

    More likely the DOJ is just annoyed with the Trump gnats playing games so they are responding in return

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    What do you think that section is about? Do you really believe it is not about collusion?
    So you can't show anywhere in the authorizing memorandum where the word "collusion" is even mentioned, you are assumingit is all about collusion, understandable considering your icon is peddling the same fabrication, did you know collusion isn't even a crime and next to impossible to prove

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    So you can't show anywhere in the authorizing memorandum where the word "collusion" is even mentioned, you are assumingit is all about collusion, understandable considering your icon is peddling the same fabrication, did you know collusion isn't even a crime and next to impossible to prove
    Again, what do you believe that section refers to or is about?

  5. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Just what I thought, nothing in return, how come I'm not surprised
    Trying to convince you people is an exercise in futility. There's so much evidence already in the public sphere it's astonishing. Your willful ignorance is noted.

    You people are going to be sooo disappointed, lol.
    Every life matters

  6. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    What damage has been created?

    You didn't really think that these documents are going to validate any of the innuendos your demogogues have sold you did you?
    Like they’re going to release something that would incriminate them lol.

    I trust them about as far as I can throw them. They oopsied and ‘forgot’ to release the ‘stop Trump’ text. Horowitz had to retrieve it.

    Don’t you tire of running interference for these people?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Stretch (06-23-2018)

  8. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    Again, what do you believe that section refers to or is about?
    I only know what it says, and as you have proven, "collusion" isn't even mentioned

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by countryboy View Post
    Trying to convince you people is an exercise in futility. There's so much evidence already in the public sphere it's astonishing. Your willful ignorance is noted.

    You people are going to be sooo disappointed, lol.
    Like you were with the IG report, opps, there goes a lot of that supposed "evidence"

    Let me help you out, inneundo isn't evidence, and no one can "convince" anyone who knows the difference between the two that they are the same

  10. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by countryboy View Post
    Trying to convince you people is an exercise in futility. There's so much evidence already in the public sphere it's astonishing. Your willful ignorance is noted.

    You people are going to be sooo disappointed, lol.
    Good point about the public sphere.

    You have to be pretty devoted to the Swamp to miss the implications to ‘we’re going to stop him’. And it wasn’t like the conversation was between two field grunts working out of the Montana office. That was out of the mouth of the lead investigator in both the Clinton investigation [which was soft-peddled] and the Russian investigation [this is it! Let’s get him!]

    You have to be willfully blind not to see a distinction in how the two investigations were handled.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    countryboy (06-23-2018)

  12. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Like you were with the IG report, opps, there goes a lot of that supposed "evidence"

    Let me help you out, inneundo isn't evidence, and no one can "convince" anyone who knows the difference between the two that they are the same
    They have nothing BUT innuendo with Trump and Russia.

    The IG report was damning for the Swamp critters. Strzok has been subpoenaed by Congress to testify as a result of it.

    If he has any sense he’ll plead the 5th.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  13. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,527
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,569 Times in 17,095 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    What crime did Strzok do? None. he did not like trump, but he did his job. He found the Weiner computer info and pushed Comey to make the speech that killed Hillary. He helped trump. I guess that is a crime. When Mueller encountered his emails, he immediately took him of the Trump investigation. What did you want him to do ,shoot him?" Mueller has been above reproach, assuming you can think.

  14. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    More likely the DOJ is just annoyed with the Trump gnats playing games so they are responding in return
    "Trump gnats?" do you have that much contempt for Congressional oversight?

    CLEARLY there were shenanigans going on that need investigating -why are you hostile to uncovering corruption?
    Kissinger: “demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one.”
    ________

    Cold War 2.0 Russia hysteria is turning people’s brains into guacamole.
    We’ve got to find a way to snap out of the propaganda trance
    ________

    Buddha: "trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it "
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7. All Good Children Go to Heaven

  15. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    What crime did Strzok do? None. he did not like trump, but he did his job. He found the Weiner computer info and pushed Comey to make the speech that killed Hillary. He helped trump. I guess that is a crime. When Mueller encountered his emails, he immediately took him of the Trump investigation. What did you want him to do ,shoot him?" Mueller has been above reproach, assuming you can think.
    It’s entirely plausible that Strzok was involved in a conspiracy in which Trump is the victim.

    ‘Insurance policies’...’stopping Trump’ constitutes sufficient probable cause for an independent counsel, since the only alternative would be the DOJ inspecting itself.

    In fact, in a less dysfunctional environment there would be an SP appointed by now. I would be interested to see what communications Strzok had with ‘Andy’ regarding the insurance policy. Trump has turned over every document Mullet has asked for—why can’t we see Andy’s and Strzok’s?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    anatta (06-23-2018)

Similar Threads

  1. "Prosecutors recover 16 pages of shredded Cohen documents"
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-16-2018, 01:46 PM
  2. "Hope Hicks Declines to Answer Some Questions in Russia Probe"
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-28-2018, 12:09 PM
  3. "Special counsel obtains thousands of Trump transition emails"
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-17-2017, 08:22 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 05-29-2016, 05:33 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •