Members banned from this thread: evince


Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 93

Thread: How do you know if someone is seeking Asylum, vs breaking into the country?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    10,731
    Thanks
    4,096
    Thanked 4,265 Times in 3,123 Posts
    Groans
    1,077
    Groaned 266 Times in 254 Posts

    Default How do you know if someone is seeking Asylum, vs breaking into the country?

    Apparently libs are all mind readers and know that 100% of people illegally crossing the border are seeking asylum. Therefore have not broken any laws, therefore ought to have their children stay with them.

    HOW DO YOU KNOW? Until they are processed, questioned, and proof of their asylum claims can be substantiated, you DON'T. ANYONE can lie and say they are seeking asylum, when really they are just trying to illegally enter.

    Therefore it would make sense to separate the kids until the trials/investigations are over. How do you know these kids aren't victims of sex trafficking? How do you know they are even their parents?

    I bet if they let a sex trafficed kid stay with the adult he/she was with Libs would FLIP!

    It's a new liberal trick being deployed. You can't deny anyone entrance because they MIGHT be asylum seekers! What a JOKE!


    So how about it libs, how can you tell? Are you mind readers now?
    Keep changing the names. It doesn't change the meaning.



    Abortion
    Pro-Choice
    Women's rights
    Women's Health


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Irish For This Post:

    Callinectes (06-23-2018)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    14,239
    Thanks
    1,579
    Thanked 4,734 Times in 3,515 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 291 Times in 282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    Apparently libs are all mind readers and know that 100% of people illegally crossing the border are seeking asylum. Therefore have not broken any laws, therefore ought to have their children stay with them.

    HOW DO YOU KNOW? Until they are processed, questioned, and proof of their asylum claims can be substantiated, you DON'T. ANYONE can lie and say they are seeking asylum, when really they are just trying to illegally enter.

    Therefore it would make sense to separate the kids until the trials/investigations are over. How do you know these kids aren't victims of sex trafficking? How do you know they are even their parents?

    I bet if they let a sex trafficed kid stay with the adult he/she was with Libs would FLIP!

    It's a new liberal trick being deployed. You can't deny anyone entrance because they MIGHT be asylum seekers! What a JOKE!


    So how about it libs, how can you tell? Are you mind readers now?
    Sorry, some of us are aware of how euros got here, your whiny tantrums are pathetic.

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 235 Times in 163 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 28 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    cubanfamily_hdv.jpg
    Exhibit 1

    f7e4dbf4efe40adabb6d1759007719c7de23b018e58c14b94ddf86f198b7ae18.jpg
    Exhibit 2

    Do you really need to ask yourself which one is seeking asylum?


    Actually they both are and were granted asylum -- but, if the brown people aren't from Cuba -- chances are, they are not seeking asylum.

  5. The Following User Groans At rhym3pays For This Awful Post:

    Phantasmal (06-21-2018)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    10,731
    Thanks
    4,096
    Thanked 4,265 Times in 3,123 Posts
    Groans
    1,077
    Groaned 266 Times in 254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fentoine Lum View Post
    Sorry, some of us are aware of how euros got here, your whiny tantrums are pathetic.
    Euros got here mostly be LEGAL immigration. The country was at a huge labor shortage so welcomed the early 20th century waves.
    Keep changing the names. It doesn't change the meaning.



    Abortion
    Pro-Choice
    Women's rights
    Women's Health


  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    10,731
    Thanks
    4,096
    Thanked 4,265 Times in 3,123 Posts
    Groans
    1,077
    Groaned 266 Times in 254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhym3pays View Post
    cubanfamily_hdv.jpg
    Exhibit 1

    f7e4dbf4efe40adabb6d1759007719c7de23b018e58c14b94ddf86f198b7ae18.jpg
    Exhibit 2

    Do you really need to ask yourself which one is seeking asylum?


    Actually they both are and were granted asylum -- but, if the brown people aren't from Cuba -- chances are, they are not seeking asylum.
    Are you suggesting both are? Just more virtue signaling by the left. Did you care when Obama was deporting these same people/kids/families?
    Keep changing the names. It doesn't change the meaning.



    Abortion
    Pro-Choice
    Women's rights
    Women's Health


  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    Euros got here mostly be LEGAL immigration. The country was at a huge labor shortage so welcomed the early 20th century waves.

    You are being an infantile idiot grow up

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 235 Times in 163 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 28 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    Are you suggesting both are? Just more virtue signaling by the left. Did you care when Obama was deporting these same people/kids/families?
    You asked a question, then got mad at the answer -- not my problem -- and I also understand why virtues bother people who have known.

    Yes, they both were seeking asylum and they both were given an opportunity to plead their case before a court -- the same process that existed when Obama was in office is the same process that exists after him.

    I have no sympathy for your hissy fit over Trump's policy backfiring

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,465
    Thanks
    16,662
    Thanked 20,734 Times in 14,330 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    Euros got here mostly be LEGAL immigration. The country was at a huge labor shortage so welcomed the early 20th century waves.
    Until 1920, our borders were open to everyone. The answer to your thread title is simple.

    Asylum seekers arrive at the legal entries, and are turned away per trump's order. They are told a variety of lies, and told to 'try tomorrow'. So they sneak in at another point of entry, and become criminals.

    Trump administration officials have, in recent weeks, adopted a carrot-and-stick approach to asylum applicants. They have told those who cross the border illegally and make asylum requests that they will face criminal prosecution, but that if they go through the official border crossings, their applications will be processed. Yet in several cities along the border, asylum seekers who follow those instructions are turned away and told to return later. At some crossings, applicants camp out for days.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.1de7731d2b92

    Anything else you need help with?
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    christiefan915 (06-21-2018)

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    14,239
    Thanks
    1,579
    Thanked 4,734 Times in 3,515 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 291 Times in 282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    Apparently libs are all mind readers and know that 100% of people illegally crossing the border are seeking asylum. Therefore have not broken any laws, therefore ought to have their children stay with them.

    HOW DO YOU KNOW? Until they are processed, questioned, and proof of their asylum claims can be substantiated, you DON'T. ANYONE can lie and say they are seeking asylum, when really they are just trying to illegally enter.

    Therefore it would make sense to separate the kids until the trials/investigations are over. How do you know these kids aren't victims of sex trafficking? How do you know they are even their parents?

    I bet if they let a sex trafficed kid stay with the adult he/she was with Libs would FLIP!

    It's a new liberal trick being deployed. You can't deny anyone entrance because they MIGHT be asylum seekers! What a JOKE!


    So how about it libs, how can you tell? Are you mind readers now?
    If they're semi hot Russian nude models it's asylum, if they're brown skinned, or worse, black or muslim, they're vermin infesting your country. Don cleared that up long, long ago.

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fentoine Lum View Post
    If they're semi hot Russian nude models it's asylum, if they're brown they're vermin infesting your country. Don cleared that up long, long ago.
    Aylum seekers do not include economic seekers.
    They have to have a tangible fear for their lives -either documented or by class.

    We are not here to settle Honduras drug wars - it's a transit point for S.America cocaine

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    31,850
    Thanks
    1,475
    Thanked 6,520 Times in 5,217 Posts
    Groans
    779
    Groaned 2,477 Times in 2,299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Until 1920, our borders were open to everyone. The answer to your thread title is simple.

    Asylum seekers arrive at the legal entries, and are turned away per trump's order. They are told a variety of lies, and told to 'try tomorrow'. So they sneak in at another point of entry, and become criminals.



    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.1de7731d2b92

    Anything else you need help with?
    Do you think there should be any limits to immigration or is it just future democrat voters?

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 235 Times in 163 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 28 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    So now I will ask you

    How do you know all of these kids are victims of child sex traffickers?

    Did you think using the child sex trafficking shield would hide your blatant xenophobia?

    Did you know that well over 4 years ago Obama signed a bi-partisan bill to combat child sex trafficking?

    None of it involved separating kids from parents at the border tho, sorry.

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    33,926
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,544 Times in 9,995 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,099 Times in 1,011 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhym3pays View Post
    cubanfamily_hdv.jpg
    Exhibit 1

    f7e4dbf4efe40adabb6d1759007719c7de23b018e58c14b94ddf86f198b7ae18.jpg
    Exhibit 2

    Do you really need to ask yourself which one is seeking asylum?


    Actually they both are and were granted asylum -- but, if the brown people aren't from Cuba -- chances are, they are not seeking asylum.
    So u agree with profiling? Making a decision based on looks

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to volsrock For This Post:

    Irish (06-21-2018)

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 235 Times in 163 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 28 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    So u agree with profiling? Making a decision based on looks
    I didn't expect you to understand.

    My_point.jpg

  19. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    10,731
    Thanks
    4,096
    Thanked 4,265 Times in 3,123 Posts
    Groans
    1,077
    Groaned 266 Times in 254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhym3pays View Post
    You asked a question, then got mad at the answer -- not my problem -- and I also understand why virtues bother people who have known.

    Yes, they both were seeking asylum and they both were given an opportunity to plead their case before a court -- the same process that existed when Obama was in office is the same process that exists after him.

    I have no sympathy for your hissy fit over Trump's policy backfiring
    If you are so virtuous, why not let them into your home?
    Keep changing the names. It doesn't change the meaning.



    Abortion
    Pro-Choice
    Women's rights
    Women's Health


Similar Threads

  1. US top destination for asylum seekers
    By tsuke in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-20-2018, 05:58 AM
  2. The Case to Bring Back the Asylum
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-26-2018, 03:24 PM
  3. Anyone see that Russia gave Snowden Asylum?
    By Steelplate in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-02-2013, 10:11 AM
  4. Enter the asylum....
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-19-2011, 10:58 PM
  5. Clean Out The Congressional Asylum
    By The Bare Knuckled Pundit in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-15-2008, 09:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •