Members banned from this thread: Cypress, FUCK THE POLICE, Jarod, Mott the Hoople, Hermes Thoth, blackascoal, midcan5, Cancel 2018. 3, evince, ZappasGuitar, signalmankenneth, Phantasmal, Rune, Supposn, iolo, Yoda, Mr.Badguy, Text Drivers are Killers, CFM, Bill, domer76, sear, qmuddy2, archives, Nomad, Micawber, TTQ64, crowonapost, Tomas Fabregas, mak2, floridafan, CharacterAssassin, JqYaqui, ThatOwlWoman, Tranquillus in Exile, Controlled Opposition, katzgar, Jade Dragon, Nordberg, Crazy Cat Lady, Bourbon, Frank Apisa, Gotcha68, Centerleftfl, kudzu, tff, PoliTalker, rjhenn, Guno צְבִי, Rigby5, jbander1, Fentoine Lum, Oracle Of JPP 714, Jack, DebraDoesDonald, Aarr!, Kaiden, magellan, HaroldCruz, rhym3pays, LV426, Zarathustra, Wry Catcher, AmericanResurgence, Old Trapper and Juliedang


Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Remember when immigration advocates slammed the "slimy" Obama Administration?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Question Remember when immigration advocates slammed the "slimy" Obama Administration?




    President Barack Obama’s administration requested that a federal court reverse a 2015 order which prohibited the detention of mothers and children who fled violence in countries in Central America.

    In a filing submitted in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Justice Department argued the administration may have violated the “Flores agreement,” in force since 1997, which is supposed to protect the rights of immigrant children. However, the claimed any violations do not matter anymore because Homeland Security and Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) changed the policies at issue in this lawsuit challenging immigrant family detention.

    The Obama administration insisted it had ended the “blanket” detention of “female-headed families.” It maintained that the length of detention at family facilities had been dramatically reduced. And it claimed that ICE “no longer considers general deterrence as a factor in individual bond determinations for Central American women and children.”

    The filing added, “The court’s order almost exclusively analyzed and addressed detention policies and practices that no longer exist.”

    This represents a slimy attempt to push Judge Dolly M. Gee into scuttling an order which sought to hold the Obama administration accountable for corruption and misconduct that has been ongoing as a result of immigration policies. But the administration did not stop there.

    The Justice Department stretched the nature of the judge’s order and disingenuously claimed this may undermine the government’s ability to detain and expedite removal of undocumented immigrants. It suggested progress achieved in “reducing the number of families illegally crossing the Southwest border since the summer of 2014” could be undone.

    It was a despicable example of fear-mongering.




    https://shadowproof.com/2015/08/07/obama-administration-shamefully-attempts-to-scuttle-court-order-against-immigrant-family-detention/

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Remember this?



    IMMIGRANT ASYLUM SEEKERS WERE CAGED BY OBAMA - CAGED LIKE ANIMALS

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default When they protested Obama the kid-cager, where were JPP liberals?


  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post



    President Barack Obama’s administration requested that a federal court reverse a 2015 order which prohibited the detention of mothers and children who fled violence in countries in Central America.

    In a filing submitted in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Justice Department argued the administration may have violated the “Flores agreement,” in force since 1997, which is supposed to protect the rights of immigrant children. However, the claimed any violations do not matter anymore because Homeland Security and Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) changed the policies at issue in this lawsuit challenging immigrant family detention.

    The Obama administration insisted it had ended the “blanket” detention of “female-headed families.” It maintained that the length of detention at family facilities had been dramatically reduced. And it claimed that ICE “no longer considers general deterrence as a factor in individual bond determinations for Central American women and children.”

    The filing added, “The court’s order almost exclusively analyzed and addressed detention policies and practices that no longer exist.”

    This represents a slimy attempt to push Judge Dolly M. Gee into scuttling an order which sought to hold the Obama administration accountable for corruption and misconduct that has been ongoing as a result of immigration policies. But the administration did not stop there.

    The Justice Department stretched the nature of the judge’s order and disingenuously claimed this may undermine the government’s ability to detain and expedite removal of undocumented immigrants. It suggested progress achieved in “reducing the number of families illegally crossing the Southwest border since the summer of 2014” could be undone.

    It was a despicable example of fear-mongering.




    https://shadowproof.com/2015/08/07/obama-administration-shamefully-attempts-to-scuttle-court-order-against-immigrant-family-detention/
    No, I don't recall that being done.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    No, I don't recall that being done.
    It was done whether you recall it or not.

    It's a matter of public record.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    It was done whether you recall it or not.

    It's a matter of public record.
    I must have missed it; seeing as how the MSM didn't go on and on, for days on end.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default They called him "the deporter in chief" but JPP liberals were silent then and now



    OBAMA - DEPORTER IN CHIEF - ENEMY OF IMMIGRANTS



    The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and American Immigration Council expressed outrage.

    “The response from DOJ to Judge Gee’s recent ruling is no more than bad play-acting at compliance. Truly, they should be embarrassed to submit such a document to a court of law,” AILA President Victor Nieblas Pradis stated. “Ever since Judge Gee first threatened her order, the administration has been scrambling to quickly release some of the mothers and children, and they’ve bungled the process badly, leaving in detention many women and children who have been locked up way too long.”

    “The government’s protest that ‘we’ve fixed things, we promise’ rings hollow when the sharp light of reality shines on the detention centers. Our volunteer attorneys on the ground with the CARA project see the truth every day, and know that it is not reflected in this shameful document. They know, and have submitted case after case to ICE, of the children and mothers confined for extended periods, waiting for someone to act on their cases. This injustice must end.”

    For example, at facilities in Dilley and Karnes, Texas, the CARA Pro Bono Project reported its volunteers had observed ICE using “coercive tactics to persuade women to accept ankle monitors.” And, in the process, these women are being denied access to counsel.

    “Specifically, ICE has summoned women to ‘court’ appointments using post-it notes instructing them, “Ir a Corte” (Go to Court) within thirty minutes (see post-it note attached). The women have no idea why they are being summoned,” according to CARA. “Once inside the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) courtroom trailer, ICE officers told the women ankle monitors were a condition for release. For the women who had their bond reviewed and lowered by immigration judges, ICE officers proclaimed that the immigration judges’ word has no value.”

    “We do not understand the authority that ICE has to issue ankle monitors after an immigration judge has reviewed and set the bond. The Miami Immigration Judges have been similarly perplexed, as authority to change the terms of the bond lies with the court via a motion for redetermination based on changed circumstances or with the Board of Immigration Appeals via an appeal. While ICE can offer terms less restrictive than the immigration judge’s order, anything more restrictive is firmly within the purview of the courts.”

    Mothers at Dilley have faced “intimidation as a result of speaking with counsel about their ankle monitors.”

    https://shadowproof.com/2015/08/07/obama-administration-shamefully-attempts-to-scuttle-court-order-against-immigrant-family-detention/

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I must have missed it; seeing as how the MSM didn't go on and on, for days on end.
    They were in the tank for Obama?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 99
    Last Post: 05-29-2018, 07:13 PM
  2. Donald Trump say "Obama administration was a disaster"
    By Tomas Fabregas in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-10-2018, 12:15 PM
  3. Replies: 105
    Last Post: 12-30-2016, 02:54 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-25-2012, 03:25 PM
  5. Bill Clinton: Purdum a "Sleazy" "Slimy" "Scumbag"
    By blackascoal in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-03-2008, 07:56 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •