Why do we separate convicted bank robbers from their children?

[domer76]

This message is hidden because the frog-fucker, USFREEDUMBCUNT, is on your ignore list.

[Legion]

We have some of those kids right here in PA. But the question was about family members meeting the migrants at the border and taking the kids if parents were detained.

Do you have any confirmed accounts of "family members" who wanted to meet "the migrants at the border" for the purpose of "taking the kids if parents were detained?"

No.

Thank you. Witness is excused.

[Legion]

Plus the radio was talking about this and supposedly there were illegal immigrants that were "escorting" children that they had no connection to and was just using them to try to enter the US.

REMEMBER WHEN THE FEDS GAVE IMMIGRANT KIDS TO ABUSERS ON OBAMA'S WATCH?

The United States government placed an unknown number of Central American migrant children into the custody of human traffickers after neglecting to run the most basic checks on these so-called “caregivers,” according to a Senate report.

In the fall of 2013, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors traveled to the U.S. southern border, in flight from poverty and gang violence in Central America.

At least six of those children were eventually resettled on an egg farm in Marion, Ohio, where their sponsors forced them to work 12 hours a day under threats of death.

Local law enforcement uncovered the operation, prompting the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to open an inquiry into the federal government’s handling of migrants.

“It is intolerable that human trafficking — modern-day slavery — could occur in our own backyard,” Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio and the chairman of the subcommittee, told the New York Times. “But what makes the Marion cases even more alarming is that a U.S. government agency was responsible for delivering the victims into the hands of their abusers.”

As detention centers became incapable of housing the massive influx of migrants, the Department of Health and Human Services started placing children into the care of sponsors who would oversee the minors until their bids for refugee status could be reviewed.

Officials failed to confirm whether the adults volunteering for this task were actually relatives or good Samaritans — and not unscrupulous egg farmers or child molesters. The department performed check-in visits at caretakers’ homes in only 5 percent of cases between 2013 and 2015, according to the report.

The Senate’s investigation built on an Associated Press report that found more than two dozen unaccompanied children were placed in homes where they were sexually abused, starved, or forced into slave labor.

HHS claimed that it lacked the funds and authorities that a more rigorous screening process would have required. However, the investigation also found that HHS did not spend all of the money allocated to it for handling the crisis.

The agency placed 90,000 migrant children into sponsor care between 2013 and 2015.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/01/hhs-handed-child-migrants-to-human-traffickers.html

[Damocles]

Horseshit. Children in the US are not taken from the custody of their parents for misdemeanors.

Your analogy of a person in jail for a DUI and the detention of these people is a lame absurdity.

No. It isn't. It is a relatively close analogy. Both are misdemeanors where children are with the parent when the crime was committed. And yeah, people are arrested for misdemeanors when their children are around. And when it happens their children are not arrested, child services is called and the children go elsewhere.

[USFREEDOM911]

This message is hidden because the frog-fucker, USFREEDUMBCUNT, is on your ignore list.

GEE, domer is really going off the deep end and it appears that Christiecunt is help to hold his head under water.

[Legion]

No. It isn't. It is a relatively close analogy. Both are misdemeanors where children are with the parent when the crime was committed. And yeah, people are arrested for misdemeanors when their children are around. And when it happens their children are not arrested, child services is called and the children go elsewhere.

Funny, in Washington State, kids get separated from their parents and are locked up for truancy - which isn't a crime. I guess that most of them could be US citizens, though, so there's that.

[USFREEDOM911]

I knew there was a reason I liked her.

I said Christiecunt.

[Legion]

I said Christiecrite.

I know.

[USFREEDOM911]

I know.

Then why do you keep changing it?

[USFREEDOM911]

Because I want to, and because I can.

So you've decided to go back to your old ways, that resulted in the majority of JPP members ignoring you.

So sad.

[USFREEDOM911]

Think so?

I'll tell you a little secret:

 

She hates being called Christiecrite more than she hates being called "cunt". She'll be pissed that I told you and deny it, but it's true.

I don't care; because she's a cunt.

[domer76]

No. It isn't. It is a relatively close analogy. Both are misdemeanors where children are with the parent when the crime was committed. And yeah, people are arrested for misdemeanors when their children are around. And when it happens their children are not arrested, child services is called and the children go elsewhere.

Let's repeat, since you failed to comprehend the first time:

Horseshit. Children in the US are not taken from the custody of their parents for misdemeanors.

[USFREEDOM911]

Let's repeat, since you failed to comprehend the first time:

Horseshit. Children in the US are not taken from the custody of their parents for misdemeanors.

Yes they are; but you just want to ignore all the FACTS that have been presented.

[Legion]

Yes they are; but you just want to ignore all the FACTS that have been presented.

I guess DEMOCRAT Domer thinks these people were all lying.

[domer76]

This message is hidden because the clueless idiot, USFREEDUMBCUNT, is on your ignore list, and doesn't realize he's talking to a hand.

Laughable dumbshit