#1 Reason Comey didn’t charge Hillary

[J Craft]

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

Well, she was obviously in violation then, as she is suggesting I supported pedophelia, when the actual context of everything I posted about Duggar, was that of “ let’s wait and see”.

That didn’t change the fact, that my accusation about her being willing to think the worst wasn’t correct. She’s such a twit.

[Legion]

IC. It's only a serious issue when you comment on it.

Think so?

I posted news articles and a mature discussion involving how it effects people, etc.

[Legion]

Well, she was obviously in violation then as she suggesting I supported pedophelia, when the actual context of everything I posted about Duggar was that of “ let’s wait and see”.

That didn’t change the fact that my accusation about her being willing to think the worst want correct. She’s such a twit.

I suspect that she feels entitled to cross the line because she thinks Rana will never agree to punish her.

[Legion]

Matthew 23:27 "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."

If you owned a Bible, it'd be dusty, wouldn't it?

[Bigdog]

The FBI is not supposed to interfere in elections. Comey knew that, but did it anyway. He thought Hillary was going to win nearly everyone did. Comey is a lifetime Republican, but he knew what the polls were saying. He acted to help the FBI. Everything he did, helped Trump. It did not help Hillary. That proves he was doing his job as he saw it. The IG report says he should not have done that. The agency is careful not to get into politics. He did. But he helped Daffy. Comeys bias was toward the agency. How can anyone say it was pro Hillary when it kneecapped her? What is clear is your lack of logic and understanding. yeah, Comey showed Hillary bias by having a press conference that hurt her. You can believe anything you want, can't you?

Comey released the info and declared her innocent ... only because he happily believed the Hillbag was a lock. He based his decision to act on that "fact". Had the coronation of the queen been in doubt, ... he would not have released the info. This is clear.

[Nordberg]

The New York office was jumping up and down about the emails found on Weiners laptop but they were being ignored by headquarters.

That sounds a bit like they were trying to keep from harming Hillary’s campaign. Or maybe you have a better explanation.

While they were soaring in the air, they had a press conference about the emails. Strzok, who found them, told Comey he should release them. You rightys are so far under the right wing conspiracy umbrella that you cannot imagine people just doing their jobs, regardless of who gets hurt. You guys project your blind ass bias where it does not exist. Yeah, some people ,properly, thought Trump is a horrible joke on American politics. But they still did their jobs. Turned out they were wrong. There were no new emails. Are you guys crying because that made such a terrible mistake that hurt Hillary and helped trump? You should be, if you are consistent.

[christiefan915]

I suspect that she feels entitled to cross the line because she thinks Rana will never agree to punish her.

I suspect you didn't notice that the odious J Craft made a point of attacking me despite the fact that I said nothing to him, and haven't for ages.

[Legion]

I suspect you didn't notice that the odious J Craft made a point of attacking me despite the fact that I said nothing to him, and haven't for ages.

So?

[Legion]

Comey released the info and declared her innocent ... only because he happily believed the Hillbag was a lock. He based his decision to act on that "fact". Had the coronation of the queen been in doubt, ... he would not have released the info. This is clear.

Isn't it a fact that Comey altered his language on an official document prior to interviewing Hillary, Bigdog? I heard that the effect of his alteration was to preclude any criminal charges against the Hildebeast. Is that true?

[christiefan915]

Think so?

I posted news articles and a mature discussion involving how it effects people, etc.

My thread on Josh Duggar and how his family dealt with his sickness was the same as yours. Funny how you agreed with me previously but are now on the attack.

We all know the history of that discussion and we also know that I wasn't suggesting that the odious J Craft was anything more than an apologist for the Duggars, because for one thing he agrees with their brand of Christianity. But go ahead and pretend I was insinuating otherwise. That's something you do well.

[christiefan915]

So?

So ask yourself why he feels compelled to do it when it has nothing to do with the thread. I guess you're giving him a pass because now you like him.

[Legion]

So ask yourself why he feels compelled to do it when it has nothing to do with the thread. I guess you're giving him a pass because now you like him.

I don't recall expressing any fondness for JC, and I'm unaware of any compelling reason to ask him why he dislikes you.

You seem anxious to distance the discussion from this hypothesis:

I suspect that she feels entitled to cross the line because she thinks Rana will never agree to punish her.

[Legion]

My thread on Josh Duggar and how his family dealt with his sickness was the same as yours. Funny how you agreed with me previously but are now on the attack. We all know the history of that discussion and we also know that I wasn't suggesting that the odious J Craft was anything more than an apologist for the Duggars, because for one thing he agrees with their brand of Christianity. But go ahead and pretend I was insinuating otherwise. That's something you do well.

Suggesting what you seem to be implying about JC is not what I'd characterize as "mature discussion".

[christiefan915]

I don't recall expressing any fondness for JC, and I'm unaware of any compelling reason to ask him why he dislikes you.

Yet you've sided with him and his insults while pretending you didn't agree with me about the Duggars when it all went down.

You seem anxious to distance the discussion from this hypothesis:

"You seem anxious", is that your spidey sense at work?

There's nothing to distance from because no line was crossed. Everything I said about him was confirmed by the earlier threads, despite his attempts to whitewash his comments.

[christiefan915]

Suggesting what you seem to be implying about JC is not what I'd characterize as "mature discussion".

Excuse me but I was speaking about the original threads when the controversy first started. Go ahead, pretend you didn't know that.