Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 789101112 LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 175

Thread: Supreme Court rules in favor of Ohio 'voter purge'

  1. #151 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    22,675
    Thanks
    595
    Thanked 12,388 Times in 7,999 Posts
    Groans
    16
    Groaned 809 Times in 761 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Are you saying that the Democrats didn't also fight this all the way to the SCOTUS, to try to squash it??
    Not what I'm saying at all. Of course they did, because it benefits Republicans.

  2. #152 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Since our resident JPP liberals feel that the OHIO law is abhorrent, I would like for at least one of them to show how they think the voter registration should be able to remove those who have died, moved, are no longer mentally capable of casting a ballot, etc.

    Please explain a process that you would find acceptable; because I haven't seen an alternative offered, in this entire thread.

    Who should be purged from the voter registration and how?
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  3. #153 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post
    Not what I'm saying at all. Of course they did, because it benefits Republicans.
    Are you saying that if they aren't purged yet still don't vote it benefit Democrats? I'm not real sure how purging someone that didn't take part in the process benefits anyone.

  4. #154 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post
    70% of people who they sent out to didn't respond.

    It's just adding another step. This is transparent to me. An effort to reduce the # of people who vote. Republicans win more when fewer people vote.
    But these same "poor" people would have no problem in filling out and returning a questioner regarding their welfare or food stamps, drivers license..etc., Things that make you go Hummmmmmmmmmmm!

    Nor does this new law explain the apathy all across the nation that details the fact that over half of the voting age population refuse to exercise their right to vote....yet bitch like hell concerning the results. Out of a population of over 300 million less than 137 million actually cast a single vote. The real culprit concerning voter suppression is APATHY.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Ralph For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (06-12-2018)

  6. #155 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    But these same "poor" people would have no problem in filling out and returning a questioner regarding their welfare or food stamps, drivers license..etc., Things that make you go Hummmmmmmmmmmm!

    Nor does this new law explain the apathy all across the nation that details the fact that over half of the voting age population refuse to exercise their right to vote....yet bitch like hell concerning the results. Out of a population of over 300 million less than 137 million actually cast a single vote. The real culprit concerning voter suppression is APATHY.
    They're the same ones that whined about voter ID yet when the almost 170,000 in my state identified as not having a valid ID under the new laws were offered a ride and free ID, 17 showed up on the day it was being done.

  7. #156 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    They're the same ones that whined about voter ID yet when the almost 170,000 in my state identified as not having a valid ID under the new laws were offered a ride and free ID, 17 showed up on the day it was being done.
    But-but-but; they're taking away their right to vote.

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  8. #157 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    But-but-but; they're taking away their right to vote.

    I'm still trying to figure out how someone purged is being denied the right to do something they chose not to do and the reason why they were purged.

  9. #158 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    I'm still trying to figure out how someone purged is being denied the right to do something they chose not to do and the reason why they were purged.
    I guess that since I haven't bought any fresh fruit from that roadside vender, his moving elsewhere has denied me right to buy fruit from him; EVER AGAIN.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  10. #159 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,447
    Thanks
    23,965
    Thanked 19,108 Times in 13,083 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Any actions taken which strike legal voters from the rolls are actions against democracy.

    Republicans fool themselves into believing this helps eliminate voter fraud but the fraud is what they believe. This is really done to get Republicans, whom would have lost in a larger turn-out, elected.

    This is the epitome of party over country.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  11. #160 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Any actions taken which strike legal voters from the rolls are actions against democracy.

    Republicans fool themselves into believing this helps eliminate voter fraud but the fraud is what they believe. This is really done to get Republicans, whom would have lost in a larger turn-out, elected.

    This is the epitome of party over country.
    Which legal votes have struck from the voting rolls?
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  12. #161 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    I have no opinion on this. Thought I’d up my post average to point it out

  13. #162 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Any actions taken which strike legal voters from the rolls are actions against democracy.
    They are not legal voters if they no longer live in that precinct, county, or state.

  14. #163 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post
    Not what I'm saying at all. Of course they did, because it benefits Republicans.
    LMAO... no, it did not. You are a simpleton that buys into their bullshit talking points.

  15. #164 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,319
    Thanks
    13,309
    Thanked 40,976 Times in 32,291 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    /slaps Chrispy upside the head for not responding to the proof she demanded.......

  16. #165 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Any actions taken which strike legal voters from the rolls are actions against democracy.

    Republicans fool themselves into believing this helps eliminate voter fraud but the fraud is what they believe. This is really done to get Republicans, whom would have lost in a larger turn-out, elected.

    This is the epitome of party over country.
    Care to explain how purging someone from a list for an action they haven't chosen to take is denying them anything?

Similar Threads

  1. Ohio inactive voter purge criteria upheld by SCOTUS
    By Celticguy in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 06-20-2018, 05:08 AM
  2. Judge rules against NC voter purge
    By Leonthecat in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2016, 09:47 PM
  3. Supreme Court rules in favor of terror victims
    By Konono in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-22-2016, 02:38 AM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-11-2013, 07:23 AM
  5. Supreme Court rules in favor of showing ID's to vote
    By WRL in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-29-2008, 06:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •