Members banned from this thread: Jarod, evince, Leonthecat, domer76 and archives


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 44 of 44

Thread: Ohio inactive voter purge criteria upheld by SCOTUS

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    14,239
    Thanks
    1,579
    Thanked 4,734 Times in 3,515 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 291 Times in 282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Loves Marxist dogma.
    It's merely american history pard. The founder's vision was that only land holding affluent white males alone got the vote. We all know it, which is why you have to engage in denial.

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fentoine Lum View Post
    It's merely american history pard. The founder's vision was that only land holding affluent white males alone got the vote. We all know it, which is why you have to engage in denial.
    That was not their vision. They left setting voting qualifications to the states and requirements varied. In NJ women could vote if they owned property, freed slaves could vote in four states, NH abolished the property requirement in 1792. Most states did limit voting to male property owners, but the point is that any state could allow anybody to vote they chose to. They specifically rejected having federal voting standards. The national requirement to be a citizen to vote in federal elections did not occur until 1995.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-17-2018)

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    That was not their vision. They left setting voting qualifications to the states and requirements varied. In NJ women could vote if they owned property, freed slaves could vote in four states, NH abolished the property requirement in 1792. Most states did limit voting to male property owners, but the point is that any state could allow anybody to vote they chose to. They specifically rejected having federal voting standards. The national requirement to be a citizen to vote in federal elections did not occur until 1995.
    Every State should purge the voters list, for anyone who missed a Federal election; seeing as how they can always reregister.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  5. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-17-2018)

  6. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Good for them.
    People move away or out of state... or die or stop voting.. I can't imagine the voter registration would be static.

  7. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    People move away or out of state... or die or stop voting.. I can't imagine the voter registration would be static.
    After a Federal Election, the voting rolls should be looked at and any one that didn't vote should be purged.

    Then have public service announcements that tell people: "If you didn't vote in the last Federal Election, you will need to reregister.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  8. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    14,239
    Thanks
    1,579
    Thanked 4,734 Times in 3,515 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 291 Times in 282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    That was not their vision. They left setting voting qualifications to the states and requirements varied. In NJ women could vote if they owned property, freed slaves could vote in four states, NH abolished the property requirement in 1792. Most states did limit voting to male property owners, but the point is that any state could allow anybody to vote they chose to. They specifically rejected having federal voting standards. The national requirement to be a citizen to vote in federal elections did not occur until 1995.
    Like I said. Your founders feared and loathed the common folk and set up a constitution "granting" (even though their fweedumb was from their god) the vote (representation) to aristocratic males alone. Revisit Bacons Rebellion and the aftermath wherein the mechanisms of dividing the unsubstantial people were explored and established.

  9. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fentoine Lum View Post
    Like I said. Your founders feared and loathed the common folk and set up a constitution "granting" (even though their fweedumb was from their god) the vote (representation) to aristocratic males alone. Revisit Bacons Rebellion and the aftermath wherein the mechanisms of dividing the unsubstantial people were explored and established.
    Our founders!!

    That must mean you're not an American, are probably living elsewhere, and haven't realized that this means your opinion doesn't mean shit.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  10. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-17-2018)

  11. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fentoine Lum View Post
    Like I said. Your founders feared and loathed the common folk and set up a constitution "granting" (even though their fweedumb was from their god) the vote (representation) to aristocratic males alone. Revisit Bacons Rebellion and the aftermath wherein the mechanisms of dividing the unsubstantial people were explored and established.
    To be more accurate, the only body the founders allowed the voters to choose was the House. Senate, president, and judiciary were not chosen by the voters. The founders were aware what they established would "deteriorate" into a democracy which was what Franklin meant by establishing a republic "if you can keep it." What the founders created is less important than the fact that today it has evolved into a system with universal suffrage no longer limited to aristocratic males.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-17-2018)

  13. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fentoine Dumb View Post
    It's merely american history pard. The founder's vision was that only land holding affluent white males alone got the vote. We all know it, which is why you have to engage in denial.
    Yep, in moron land where you wallow, America and the Constitution is bad. STFU moron.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  14. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fentoine Lum View Post
    Like I said. Your founders feared and loathed the common folk and set up a constitution "granting" (even though their fweedumb was from their god) the vote (representation) to aristocratic males alone. Revisit Bacons Rebellion and the aftermath wherein the mechanisms of dividing the unsubstantial people were explored and established.
    Wrong again shit-for-brains; they feared ignorant low information dumbfuck a like you voting in elections and picking dishonest politicians who promised them free stuff.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  15. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,920
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,834 Times in 17,265 Posts
    Groans
    5,348
    Groaned 4,601 Times in 4,278 Posts

    Default

    This decision was made possible by the rightys stealing Obamas pick for the Supremes. It was Baracks and you stole it because you figured you could get away with it. You did and should be ashamed.

  16. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    This decision was made possible by the rightys stealing Obamas pick for the Supremes. It was Baracks and you stole it because you figured you could get away with it. You did and should be ashamed.
    And it is the right of the Senate to confirm or not confirm an appointment. Nothing requires a useless vote on a confirmation they already know will not be approved.

  17. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NOTHINGberger View Post
    This decision was made possible by the rightys stealing Obamas pick for the Supremes. It was Baracks and you stole it because you figured you could get away with it. You did and should be ashamed.
    It is politics you whiny asshole; this is what happens when you don't win elections. You dimwits on the left are pathetic.

    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  18. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    https://usat.ly/2sXnE4I

    Don't vote for 6 years and fail to respond to requests to confirm residency has been upheld as valid by the highest court in the land.
    Nothing but common sense but lefties will be whining most terribly over this one.
    LOL
    My God, your accusation is stupid.. Every state has always had criteria for purging their voter rolls.. and most do it more often than six years.

    You are really lame to think it has anything to do with "liberals".

Similar Threads

  1. voter purging and Union power on Scotus docet
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-03-2018, 12:12 PM
  2. Voter ID law questions answered by the SCOTUS
    By evince in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-27-2017, 01:42 PM
  3. Judge rules against NC voter purge
    By Leonthecat in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2016, 09:47 PM
  4. Judge: GOP voter purge illegal
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-12-2016, 02:09 PM
  5. Judge refuses to block Florida voter purge
    By RockX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-27-2012, 11:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •