Is the inaccuracy of the polls over the past four years proof of election rigging?

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Think about it, if a certain faction in a republic started rigging elections but didn't yet have total control over society, that's exactly what you would expect to see. The polls would continue to give accurate results, but the elections would *always* tend towards the faction that was rigging the elections towards themselves. So the polls would appear to be wrong, as they were matching the actual mood of the American people, and not the mood of the election rigging faction. That is, until pollsters had put in enough arbitrary weightings towards the side that does the rigging to account for their ballot stuffing and voter suppression.

[tinfoil]

biased pollsters explains it better

[Jack]

Maybe Respondents are just fucking with the Pollsters?

[Nordberg]

There is evidence that the voter machines are hacked. The truth is exit polling was extremely accurate for many years. Networks were even asked not to say who won the presidential election on exit polling because the west coast had drops in participation when they did. Exit polling is what we use to determine if foreign elections are fair. It is bedrock.

Since Diebold, exit polling went bad. The American people were convinced the problem was with the polling. it suddenly went sour?. I saw an CSPAN show interviewing a guy in charge of polling. He had no explanation of why polling stopped working , but they had doubled the data for the coming election. They said ,mathematically, it was impossible for polling to be wrong . It went bad again. Math failed, not the machines? Not so sure. America is the only country where exit polling fails.

[Jack]

Diebold. There could easily be a conspiracy theory around this company.

[Flash]

What election polling was so wrong? In 2016 the final average of RCP polls showed Clinton 46% v. Trump 44%. The final results was Clinton 48% v. Trump 46%. That is within the 3% margin of error. There have been some polling issues written about: cell phones, lower response rate.

[Bourbon]

Россия сделала это

[MAGA MAN]

Republicans have jobs and don't have time to answer poll questions.

[Ralph]

Think about it, if a certain faction in a republic started rigging elections but didn't yet have total control over society, that's exactly what you would expect to see. The polls would continue to give accurate results, but the elections would *always* tend towards the faction that was rigging the elections towards themselves. So the polls would appear to be wrong, as they were matching the actual mood of the American people, and not the mood of the election rigging faction. That is, until pollsters had put in enough arbitrary weightings towards the side that does the rigging to account for their ballot stuffing and voter suppression.

No….its proof of rigging the polls.

[Legion]

There is evidence that the voter machines are hacked.

Is there?

[Legion]

Think about it, if a certain faction in a republic started rigging elections but didn't yet have total control over society, that's exactly what you would expect to see. The polls would continue to give accurate results, but the elections would *always* tend towards the faction that was rigging the elections towards themselves. So the polls would appear to be wrong, as they were matching the actual mood of the American people, and not the mood of the election rigging faction. That is, until pollsters had put in enough arbitrary weightings towards the side that does the rigging to account for their ballot stuffing and voter suppression.

I thought the usual liberal line says that the polls were correct and it was the interpretation of them that was wrong.

[Legion]

Россия сделала это

Выпейте еще раз.

[Nordberg]

What election polling was so wrong? In 2016 the final average of RCP polls showed Clinton 46% v. Trump 44%. The final results was Clinton 48% v. Trump 46%. That is within the 3% margin of error. There have been some polling issues written about: cell phones, lower response rate.

This was not the only election since voting machines were mandated. Of course no paper trail either.

[Legion]

This was not the only election since voting machines were mandated. Of course no paper trail either.

So?

[Nordberg]

I thought the usual liberal line says that the polls were correct and it was the interpretation of them that was wrong.

So you thought. Where do i get my liberal line from? I keep missing it. We could check but the companies claim the machines are proprietary and fight checking them. They are fancy tabulators, not complex systems.