Originally Posted by
LV426
Because your reforms are punitive and do nothing to address the systemic issue of under-funding education. Also, you're not going to attract good candidates if you do away with all the incentives. You're going to diminish the supply of good candidates. But maybe that's your plan. Starve the beast of talent so it dies and you can replace it with something worse. How cynical.
I'm a teacher in Florida. I contribute 3% of my check toward my retirement. Comes to about $110 a month. The starting salary for our district is about $43,000 not including benefits. About $52,000 for the LA school district, also not including benefits. Both before taxes.Now after federal, state and local taxes, that LA teacher has to live on the economy. Possibly not much of a difference, except the FRS(Florida Retirement System)is fully funded at the moment. The union bitches about the 3%, and they are constantly on the state's case about not "bargaining in good faith"(which is code for "we can't wring more money out of these guys because of reality"). Another thing the state gets slammed for is something common to all states, I believe. It's the tired old "we're not investing enough in our children's education!", which is also code for "we're not paying the teachers enough", because our schools are packed with "Smart Classroom Technology" and carts of new laptop computers. Freakin' place looks like the bridge of the Starship Enterprise. The bottom line is, the government at every level MUST start dealing with fiscal realities, especially involving benefits, pensions and entitlements
“The Communist party must control the guns.”
― Mao Tse-tung
“Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”-Generally attributed to Uncle Joe Stalin
“Everything under heaven is in utter choas; the situation is excellent.”
― mao tse-tung
Bookmarks