Members banned from this thread: evince, Text Drivers are Killers, CFM, Guno צְבִי and Rat Robbersson


View Poll Results: Should a new rule be proposed banning the use of racial slurs?

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    11 45.83%
  • No

    13 54.17%
Page 3 of 32 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 479

Thread: Should a new rule be proposed banning the use of racial slurs?

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,354
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,676 Times in 14,049 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

    Default

    I'm just going to say, no. It wouldn't kill me if Damo went with the majority, however.

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    31,850
    Thanks
    1,475
    Thanked 6,520 Times in 5,217 Posts
    Groans
    779
    Groaned 2,477 Times in 2,299 Posts

    Default

    I vote no

    If you don’t like the use of certain terms then ignore that poster.

    The idea seems innocuous enough. But then the request will come to ban other types of words on the basis of banning racial slurs. And while one thinks the list would be “objective” there would be those who seek to abuse it

    JPP is just fine as it is

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to canceled.2021.1 For This Post:

    Life is Golden (05-30-2018)

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    88,971
    Thanks
    146,792
    Thanked 83,302 Times in 53,215 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,661 Times in 4,380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    This is a fine line for a forum that is known for the having the most freedom of speech. Racial slurs and racism are not very welcome from either side of the aisle, but they are in fact relevant to politics.
    Very relevant, good point. That being said, it is possible to be racist -- or to discuss racism -- without the constant use of the n-word that some here seem incapable of posting without. Some of the most racist ppl here manage to let their white sheets show w/o using direct slurs. Check out the winner here.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...ighlight=bigot

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to ThatOwlWoman For This Post:

    christiefan915 (05-31-2018)

  6. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,243
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked 457 Times in 397 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 114 Posts

    Default

    no. the stupids here already deem any and everything to be a racial slur. example: Roseanne barr only described the appearance of that treason monger Valerie jarrett. Roseanne did not say she was superior to that planet of the apes/ muslim brotherhood hybrid.
    Even so, Come, Lord Jesus
    I do not participate in delusion count me out

  7. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    4,929
    Thanked 3,685 Times in 2,733 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 707 Times in 647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The problem is, the racist right will think calling out racist whites is a racial slur. They seem to always get away with "both sides do it". Their false equivalencies will have honest people banned for speaking the truth.

    Why not ban those who threaten another posters life? That's more reasonable.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to TTQ64 For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (05-30-2018)

  9. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    16,285
    Thanks
    8,930
    Thanked 4,912 Times in 3,648 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,102 Times in 1,032 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Should a new rule be proposed banning the use of racial slurs?
    I am of two minds about it.
    On one hand it would make this place a lot more civilized.
    On the other hand, sometimes the use of racial slurs is the only way we have of knowing for sure who the savage racist scumbags are when they can not control themselves and reveal themselves.
    We have the intellect to imagine the finality of our own demise but do not have the sophistication to overcome our survival instinct and accept it.
    Solution? Magical thinking and childish promises of everlasting life.
    Ergo, religion.

    rac·ist
    rāsəst/noun
    a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.
    Ask yourself honestly if this describes what you believe to be true.
    If the answer is yes, you are a racist.

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Leonthecat For This Post:

    Cancel 2018.1 (05-31-2018), christiefan915 (05-31-2018), JqYaqui (05-31-2018)

  11. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leonthecat View Post
    I am of two minds about it. On one hand it would make this place a lot more civilized. On the other hand, sometimes the use of racial slurs is the only way we have of knowing for sure who the savage racist scumbags are when they can not control themselves and reveal themselves.
    I beg to differ, my dear Brother.

    Here's why; in my experience, racists are detectable even when they don't use overt racial slurs.

    As an example, would you be able to tell that CFM is a ridiculously rank racist even if he didn't spell out his favorite racial slur?

    I believe that you would, as would I.

    The key to making such a ban work would be a clearly-defined list of proscribed racial slurs with no room for subjective judgment or speculation by either forum members or Moderators, in my opinion.

    I have no issue with allowing racists to post on JPP. After all, I find Desh quite amusing.

  12. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    31,850
    Thanks
    1,475
    Thanked 6,520 Times in 5,217 Posts
    Groans
    779
    Groaned 2,477 Times in 2,299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    I beg to differ, my dear Brother.

    Here's why; in my experience, racists are detectable even when they don't use overt racial slurs.

    As an example, would you be able to tell that CFM is a ridiculously rank racist even if he didn't spell out his favorite racial slur?

    I believe that you would, as would I.

    The key to making such a ban work would be a clearly-defined list of proscribed racial slurs with no room for subjective judgment or speculation by either forum members or Moderators, in my opinion.

    I have no issue with allowing racists to post on JPP. After all, I find Desh quite amusing.
    What would your list be?

  13. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by I Love America View Post
    What would your list be?
    I don't know. Unless Damocles agrees to move forward, there's no point in putting a list together. I'd hope he would solicit suggestions from all of us and out it to a vote. My choices may not be the same as other people's anyway.

  14. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Where Woke Goes to Die
    Posts
    14,127
    Thanks
    10,362
    Thanked 8,959 Times in 6,246 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 483 Times in 453 Posts

    Default

    The freedom of speech here distinguishes this board from a million other control freak sites on the web.

    Requesting another adult remove words from a widdle box on my screen is unnecessary and quite ridiculous.

  15. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    We should also ban offensive language of any kind.

    This should be a wholesome board with no curse words or insults. Calling someone a Democrat or liberal should be outlawed on JPP.

    Snowflakes be crying like Legion be trying to call out certain offensive words and not others.

    It does not surprise me Legion is a snowflake.

  16. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,243
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked 457 Times in 397 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 114 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    I don't know. Unless Damocles agrees to move forward, there's no point in putting a list together. I'd hope he would solicit suggestions from all of us and out it to a vote. My choices may not be the same as other people's anyway.
    I cannot speak for the man with the damming hammer, but , I believe he is a true libertarian [free and living] of mind and will not dare to submit to any form of popular PC. damo says: "have fun" PC is no fun at all. PC is also evil witchcraft.
    Even so, Come, Lord Jesus
    I do not participate in delusion count me out

  17. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trump Diva View Post
    The freedom of speech here distinguishes this board from a million other control freak sites on the web. Requesting another adult remove words from a widdle box on my screen is unnecessary and quite ridiculous.
    I respect your opinion.

    As you may know, there are already limits on the speech allowed by the owner of this forum.

    Since it is privately-owned, and since the government is not trying to legislate against any enumerated rights here, there is no First Amendment question involved.

    What I propose is that the membership comment and vote on extending the existing prohibition in an objective manner to punish the use of specific racial slurs.

    If you think that makes you less free, OK. If you want to have the option to use racial slurs, nothing is stopping you.

  18. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iewitness View Post
    I cannot speak for the man with the damming hammer, but , I believe he is a true libertarian [free and living] of mind and will not dare to submit to any form of popular PC.
    He already has. Take a look at the rules sometime.

  19. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,243
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked 457 Times in 397 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 114 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    He already has. Take a look at the rules sometime.
    that is business, not ideaological submission to PC. I think. I cannot speak further lest I find myself under the mighty damming powers of the ruler of the realm of JPP.
    Even so, Come, Lord Jesus
    I do not participate in delusion count me out

Similar Threads

  1. Univ of Alabama EXPELS student for using racial slurs
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 01-20-2018, 08:03 AM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-22-2016, 04:53 PM
  3. Union workers: racial slurs and racist symbols
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-14-2011, 02:01 PM
  4. Rep. Heath Shuler is denying a report that he heard racial slurs
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-16-2010, 11:22 AM
  5. Video of the racial slurs
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 03-26-2010, 02:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •