Members banned from this thread: evince, Text Drivers are Killers, CFM, Guno צְבִי and Rat Robbersson


View Poll Results: Should a new rule be proposed banning the use of racial slurs?

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    11 45.83%
  • No

    13 54.17%
Page 27 of 32 FirstFirst ... 17232425262728293031 ... LastLast
Results 391 to 405 of 479

Thread: Should a new rule be proposed banning the use of racial slurs?

  1. #391 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    YoYo's going to take hims ball and go home to pout!
    Hims..... LMAO

    You're such a loser, fatty fatty two by four.

  2. The Following User Groans At Cancel 2018.2 For This Awful Post:

    christiefan915 (06-05-2018)

  3. #392 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,833
    Thanks
    13,240
    Thanked 40,780 Times in 32,146 Posts
    Groans
    3,660
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    It's pretty clear you are scared to face desh.
    any truly sane person would avoid it.......

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (06-05-2018)

  5. #393 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,833
    Thanks
    13,240
    Thanked 40,780 Times in 32,146 Posts
    Groans
    3,660
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    YoYo's going to take hims ball and go home to pout!
    fucking naggers.....

    (thanks Grind.......I plan to use that a lot).......

  6. #394 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    You're entitled to believe what you wish to, Zappacrite.

    I'm not obligated to agree.

    Remind the forum of the reason you use the threadban feature yourself, will you?
    I DON'T use the threadban feature.
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  7. #395 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    I DON'T use the threadban feature.
    Have you ever used the threadban feature?

  8. #396 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    I DON'T use the threadban feature.
    What do you think of those that do?

  9. #397 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    What do you think of those that do?
    Do you recall what he said about some of the others that used it while he himself was using it?

  10. #398 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Do you recall what he said about some of the others that used it while he himself was using it?
    Maybe this should be considered!!

    Why don't those who are now objecting to the Thread Ban, start a poll and then present the results to the MODs and maybe the MODs will remove the feature!!!

    Of course all sock votes would need to be removed and might even possibly to not take the poll seriously.

    Just a suggestion.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  11. #399 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Maybe this should be considered!!

    Why don't those who are now objecting to the Thread Ban, start a poll and then present the results to the MODs and maybe the MODs will remove the feature!!!

    Of course all sock votes would need to be removed and might even possibly to not take the poll seriously.

    Just a suggestion.
    It's already been voted on twice.

    It was approved by the voting majority twice. It's settled law on JPP now.

    Judging by Billy and Grind's reactions in this thread, I don't think they want to be bothered.

  12. #400 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    31,850
    Thanks
    1,475
    Thanked 6,520 Times in 5,217 Posts
    Groans
    779
    Groaned 2,477 Times in 2,299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Did you just make a petty, derisive and insulting post, Zappacrite?
    He did but in his mind they started it so he is justified. You know the same excuse a five year old would use “they started it”

  13. #401 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    31,850
    Thanks
    1,475
    Thanked 6,520 Times in 5,217 Posts
    Groans
    779
    Groaned 2,477 Times in 2,299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Maybe this should be considered!!

    Why don't those who are now objecting to the Thread Ban, start a poll and then present the results to the MODs and maybe the MODs will remove the feature!!!

    Of course all sock votes would need to be removed and might even possibly to not take the poll seriously.

    Just a suggestion.
    I am going to have to apply stari decisis here

  14. #402 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by I Love America View Post
    He did but in his mind they started it so he is justified. You know the same excuse a five year old would use “they started it”
    "Mommy, they do it too"?

    That one?

  15. #403 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by I Love America View Post
    I am going to have to apply stari decisis here
    Thread-banning is settled law on JPP.

    Two elections.

    Two majority votes in favor.

  16. #404 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    It's already been voted on twice.

    It was approved by the voting majority twice. It's settled law on JPP now.

    Judging by Billy and Grind's reactions in this thread, I don't think they want to be bothered.
    But don't we want to show compassion for how the feature they wanted, is now hurting their feelings?
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  17. #405 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    But don't we want to show compassion for how the feature they wanted, is now hurting their feelings?
    I don't.

    BTW, I wasn't allowed to vote on the feature, FYI.

    I think Billy especially doesn't like being bothered to moderate except when it suits him.

    The moderators in general don't seem to want anymore work, as evidenced by their replies in this thread, and Damocles is conspicuous by his absence.

Similar Threads

  1. Univ of Alabama EXPELS student for using racial slurs
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 01-20-2018, 08:03 AM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-22-2016, 04:53 PM
  3. Union workers: racial slurs and racist symbols
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-14-2011, 02:01 PM
  4. Rep. Heath Shuler is denying a report that he heard racial slurs
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-16-2010, 11:22 AM
  5. Video of the racial slurs
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 03-26-2010, 02:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •