Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 61 to 68 of 68

Thread: north korea: plz come back we didnt mean it

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    If our policy is a non-nuclear world, then Kim acquiring nuclear weapons is a defeat of our Policy.
    If NK acquires nukes, why not Iran? Why not Saudis? Why not Gulf States? Why not Japan?
    We've declared that we will not tolerate NK (along with Iran) going 'nuclear'.
    They have spit in our face and said "We have 50 atomic bombs, what are you going to do about it, punk-ass bitch"
    Our response is "Hey, let's Talk".

    A little embarrassing.
    Kim made the first move to talk. He made some concessions [Trump has made zero], then got belligerent so Trump walked away.

    Then yesterday NK said they still wanted to talk and Trump left the door open for it. I fail to see what’s embarrassing about it. In fact, it’s pretty statesman like on Trump’s part.

    The foreign policy establishment should be taking notes lol.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Kim made the first move to talk. He made some concessions [Trump has made zero], then got belligerent so Trump walked away.

    Then yesterday NK said they still wanted to talk and Trump left the door open for it. I fail to see what’s embarrassing about it. In fact, it’s pretty statesman like on Trump’s part.

    The foreign policy establishment should be taking notes lol.
    Why should he give up his Nukes? Especially after Bolton (and others) brought up the 'Libya Model'.

    Do you think China or Russia (or the United States) is going to give up their Nukes? Once you have them ... you keep them.
    In my view, OUR Policy is a 'nuclear-free Korean Peninsula'.
    KIM'S Policy is he wants a nuclear capability.

    Who's Policy has won out? Kim has 50 atomic bombs. He's won. I'm sure you can delude yourself with some Orwellian logic that 'We won'. But that's not the Reality.
    We had the opportunity to crush this Tyrant, but we (America) lacks the Resolve to do what was necessary.

    In your opinion, do you think selling nukes or nuclear technology to other nations might be a hard currency option for Kim?
    In your opinion, (think Otto Warmbier and his lower teeth being moved around by pliers) is capable of selling 'dirty bombs' to ISIS, Al Qaeda, and other terrorists groups?

    We're in a Bad Position.

  3. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Why should he give up his Nukes? Especially after Bolton (and others) brought up the 'Libya Model'.

    Do you think China or Russia (or the United States) is going to give up their Nukes? Once you have them ... you keep them.
    In my view, OUR Policy is a 'nuclear-free Korean Peninsula'.
    KIM'S Policy is he wants a nuclear capability.

    Who's Policy has won out? Kim has 50 atomic bombs. He's won. I'm sure you can delude yourself with some Orwellian logic that 'We won'. But that's not the Reality.
    We had the opportunity to crush this Tyrant, but we (America) lacks the Resolve to do what was necessary.

    In your opinion, do you think selling nukes or nuclear technology to other nations might be a hard currency option for Kim?
    In your opinion, (think Otto Warmbier and his lower teeth being moved around by pliers) is capable of selling 'dirty bombs' to ISIS, Al Qaeda, and other terrorists groups?

    We're in a Bad Position.
    I like our position lol.

    We hold all the cards. Kim can keep his nukes while his country goes down the toilet. Don’t even need to fire the first bullet.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  4. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    I like our position lol.

    We hold all the cards. Kim can keep his nukes while his country goes down the toilet. Don’t even need to fire the first bullet.
    Darth: "I like our position lol."
    If Iran had 50 atomic bombs, would you say the same thing?

    Darth: "Kim can keep his nukes"
    That's NOT our Policy, but that is the Reality of the situation.

    Darth: "... his country goes down the toilet."
    Do you understand that will FORCE Kim to sell nuclear weapons and technology to any and all who desire it? Including 'dirty bombs' to terrorists?

    Darth: "We hold all the cards."
    If we 'hold all the cards', we should probably give Iran 50 atomic bombs so we could 'hold all the cards' with them too.

  5. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Darth: "I like our position lol."
    If Iran had 50 atomic bombs, would you say the same thing?

    Darth: "Kim can keep his nukes"
    That's NOT our Policy, but that is the Reality of the situation.

    Darth: "... his country goes down the toilet."
    Do you understand that will FORCE Kim to sell nuclear weapons and technology to any and all who desire it? Including 'dirty bombs' to terrorists?

    Darth: "We hold all the cards."
    If we 'hold all the cards', we should probably give Iran 50 atomic bombs so we could 'hold all the cards' with them too.
    NK already supplies weapons to other countries, including Iran. But in Iran’s case they will have less money to buy them since Trump nixed the Iranian non-treaty.

    If NK collapses because of the sanctions then that problem is solved.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  6. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    NC originally from NYC
    Posts
    35,134
    Thanks
    141,197
    Thanked 23,845 Times in 14,185 Posts
    Groans
    58
    Groaned 1,453 Times in 1,372 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hvilleherb View Post
    Trump is making sure Kim Jong Un knows who is really in charge.
    kim is playing trump for a rube, kim is much more intelligent then the orange dotard
    “If we have to have a choice between being dead and pitied, and being alive with a bad image, we’d rather be alive and have the bad image.”

    — Golda Meir

    Zionism is the movement for the self-determination and statehood for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland, the land of Israel.


    “If Hamas put down their weapons, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons, there would be no Israel."






    ברוך השם

  7. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    Art of the Deal baby
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  8. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    NK already supplies weapons to other countries, including Iran. But in Iran’s case they will have less money to buy them since Trump nixed the Iranian non-treaty.

    If NK collapses because of the sanctions then that problem is solved.
    It's nice to know what 'winning' looks like to you.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 56
    Last Post: 05-16-2018, 06:36 AM
  2. China warns Trump we will back North Korea if the US strikes first.
    By Waternark in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-11-2017, 08:21 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-22-2017, 06:26 PM
  4. North Korea "Fall-Back".....To A Red-State Option!!!
    By Mr. Shaman in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-13-2016, 07:34 AM
  5. Military Regime in North Korea Speaks: Turn South Korea into Debris
    By KingCondanomation in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-28-2008, 04:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •