Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Relevance of nothingburgers

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Relevance of nothingburgers

    When I read posts about Mueller's hunt for evidence of Russian collusion, I often see references to Gates, Manafort, Flynn, Papadoppulos, and Cohen being presented as if they were evidence of collusion. Why do lefties present these in conversations about Trump winning the election because of Russian collusion?
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Darth Omar (05-20-2018)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    You do know this was from The Republicans in The Senate ... correct?

    No Robert Mueller's investigation ....
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Bourbon For This Post:

    evince (05-16-2018)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    If the Repukes on Senate Committee are releasing info, what are they trying to get ahead of?

    Why are they willing to admit that Jr wanted dirt?

    What is about to come out?

    What is Avenatti about to release?

    Why is he admitting now that he paid back Cohen?

    What's coming this week?


    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    are the republicans in congress liberals?
    Many are, but this still does not help me understand why these things are being presented in place of evidence of collusion.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    You do know this was from The Republicans in The Senate ... correct?

    No Robert Mueller's investigation ....
    This does not clear up why lefties keep presenting the cases described in my op as if they are evidence of collusion.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Are YOU NOW willing to say the meeting wasn't about Russian Adoption?

    Like the President LIED and said it was ... ?
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,960
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,039 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    When I read posts about Mueller's hunt for evidence of Russian collusion, I often see references to Gates, Manafort, Flynn, Papadoppulos, and Cohen being presented as if they were evidence of collusion. Why do lefties present these in conversations about Trump winning the election because of Russian collusion?
    Who said they were "evidence of collusion?"

    I used the exact same names earlier to show that the big "nothingburger" ain't a nothingburger

    And the whole "evidence of collusion" is a deflection, first off, collusion isn't even a crime, and secondly, it is nearly impossible to prove.

    Mueller was never appointed to provide "evidence of collusion', but rather to investigate "Russian Government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election, to include any coordination or links between the Russian Government and individuals associated with the campaign of Donald Trump, and any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation"

    Which is exactly what he is doing, quite successfully I might add

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    christiefan915 (05-20-2018)

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,515
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,563 Times in 17,090 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    What it is on the menu will be shown when Mueller presents his results. Anyone who says they know what will happen, is just noise making. However some people Mueller interviewed say he is zeroing in on collusion. Interesting, but still have to wait. It is not a nothing pizza.

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    I used the exact same names earlier to show that the big "nothingburger" ain't a nothingburger
    This is exactly what I am talking about. I don't understand how these nothingburgers are somethingburgers when discussing evidence of Trump collusion. None of these other cases are evidence of Trump/Russian collusion, so why are these cases presented in discussions of collusion? Why are these other cases of any interest at all, besides exposing dirt on political opponents?
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Darth Omar (05-20-2018)

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    How's that Nothingburger tasting ... ?
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    What it is on the menu will be shown when Mueller presents his results. Anyone who says they know what will happen, is just noise making.
    I agree


    However some people Mueller interviewed say he is zeroing in on collusion. Interesting, but still have to wait.
    Speculation. I speculate as well, and have noticed that nothing has come up in too long a time period, so I am doubtful that anything will come up. Like you do, I must wait as well.

    It is not a nothing pizza.
    Back to the opening post, alas. What do you know that makes you state this?
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  17. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    How's that Nothingburger tasting ... ?
    Where's the beef?
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    Where's the beef?

    You Want Thighs ... with Beef?

    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  19. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    How many times a day does some liberal breathlessly inform the world that this time...

     




Similar Threads

  1. APP - The Relevance of Libertarians
    By Mott the Hoople in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-19-2010, 12:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •