Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Relevance of nothingburgers

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    169
    Thanked 595 Times in 485 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 111 Times in 103 Posts

    Default Relevance of nothingburgers

    When I read posts about Mueller's hunt for evidence of Russian collusion, I often see references to Gates, Manafort, Flynn, Papadoppulos, and Cohen being presented as if they were evidence of collusion. Why do lefties present these in conversations about Trump winning the election because of Russian collusion?
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Darth Omar (05-20-2018)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    100,335
    Thanks
    22,552
    Thanked 14,438 Times in 11,298 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 8,982 Times in 8,372 Posts

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    11,306
    Thanks
    1,118
    Thanked 6,698 Times in 4,120 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 144 Times in 130 Posts

    Default

    You do know this was from The Republicans in The Senate ... correct?

    No Robert Mueller's investigation ....

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    11,306
    Thanks
    1,118
    Thanked 6,698 Times in 4,120 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 144 Times in 130 Posts

    Default

    If the Repukes on Senate Committee are releasing info, what are they trying to get ahead of?

    Why are they willing to admit that Jr wanted dirt?

    What is about to come out?

    What is Avenatti about to release?

    Why is he admitting now that he paid back Cohen?

    What's coming this week?



  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    169
    Thanked 595 Times in 485 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 111 Times in 103 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    are the republicans in congress liberals?
    Many are, but this still does not help me understand why these things are being presented in place of evidence of collusion.
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    169
    Thanked 595 Times in 485 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 111 Times in 103 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    You do know this was from The Republicans in The Senate ... correct?

    No Robert Mueller's investigation ....
    This does not clear up why lefties keep presenting the cases described in my op as if they are evidence of collusion.
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    11,306
    Thanks
    1,118
    Thanked 6,698 Times in 4,120 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 144 Times in 130 Posts

    Default

    Are YOU NOW willing to say the meeting wasn't about Russian Adoption?

    Like the President LIED and said it was ... ?

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    9,025
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4,335 Times in 2,694 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 270 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    When I read posts about Mueller's hunt for evidence of Russian collusion, I often see references to Gates, Manafort, Flynn, Papadoppulos, and Cohen being presented as if they were evidence of collusion. Why do lefties present these in conversations about Trump winning the election because of Russian collusion?
    Who said they were "evidence of collusion?"

    I used the exact same names earlier to show that the big "nothingburger" ain't a nothingburger

    And the whole "evidence of collusion" is a deflection, first off, collusion isn't even a crime, and secondly, it is nearly impossible to prove.

    Mueller was never appointed to provide "evidence of collusion', but rather to investigate "Russian Government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election, to include any coordination or links between the Russian Government and individuals associated with the campaign of Donald Trump, and any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation"

    Which is exactly what he is doing, quite successfully I might add

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    10,755
    Thanks
    125
    Thanked 5,285 Times in 3,559 Posts
    Groans
    2,249
    Groaned 904 Times in 855 Posts

    Default

    What it is on the menu will be shown when Mueller presents his results. Anyone who says they know what will happen, is just noise making. However some people Mueller interviewed say he is zeroing in on collusion. Interesting, but still have to wait. It is not a nothing pizza.

  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    169
    Thanked 595 Times in 485 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 111 Times in 103 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    I used the exact same names earlier to show that the big "nothingburger" ain't a nothingburger
    This is exactly what I am talking about. I don't understand how these nothingburgers are somethingburgers when discussing evidence of Trump collusion. None of these other cases are evidence of Trump/Russian collusion, so why are these cases presented in discussions of collusion? Why are these other cases of any interest at all, besides exposing dirt on political opponents?
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Darth Omar (05-20-2018)

  13. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    11,306
    Thanks
    1,118
    Thanked 6,698 Times in 4,120 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 144 Times in 130 Posts

    Default

    How's that Nothingburger tasting ... ?

  14. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    169
    Thanked 595 Times in 485 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 111 Times in 103 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    What it is on the menu will be shown when Mueller presents his results. Anyone who says they know what will happen, is just noise making.
    I agree


    However some people Mueller interviewed say he is zeroing in on collusion. Interesting, but still have to wait.
    Speculation. I speculate as well, and have noticed that nothing has come up in too long a time period, so I am doubtful that anything will come up. Like you do, I must wait as well.

    It is not a nothing pizza.
    Back to the opening post, alas. What do you know that makes you state this?
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  15. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    2,328
    Thanks
    169
    Thanked 595 Times in 485 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 111 Times in 103 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    How's that Nothingburger tasting ... ?
    Where's the beef?
    It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
    consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
    contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
    Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
    personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
    contained therein, and predating this Order.

  16. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    11,306
    Thanks
    1,118
    Thanked 6,698 Times in 4,120 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 144 Times in 130 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    Where's the beef?

    You Want Thighs ... with Beef?


  17. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    18,786
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    How many times a day does some liberal breathlessly inform the world that this time...

     




Similar Threads

  1. APP - The Relevance of Libertarians
    By Mott the Hoople in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-19-2010, 11:42 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •