Page 37 of 38 FirstFirst ... 27333435363738 LastLast
Results 541 to 555 of 563

Thread: Why is evince banned from so many threads

  1. #541 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17,522
    Thanks
    4,615
    Thanked 7,531 Times in 5,757 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 810 Times in 776 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Will JPP leftists canonize Desh (like they did RBG) now that she's apparently dead?
    I don't know what anyone will do. OTOH, the fact you dragged up a two year old thread means you are lonely and tired of playing with yourself.
    A rule of thumb: If you're lying about nonexistent voter fraud, if you're limiting polling places, if you're forcing people to line up to vote in a pandemic, even the old and the infirm, then it seems you're basically admitting most Americans don't want you to be president.
    - Dan Rather, Jun 22, 2020

  2. #542 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,185
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    I don't know what anyone will do. OTOH, the fact you dragged up a two year old thread means you are lonely and tired of playing with yourself.
    Really? Does that theory apply across the board, or only to me?

  3. #543 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    24,132
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 11,175 Times in 7,189 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,113 Times in 1,952 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Your opinion has been accorded all the consideration it merits.

    What's your opinion of people who announce that they're "putting you on ignore"? Are they "afraid of being invalidated"?
    Yes, not being able to exchange shows a lack of confidence in what you are saying

  4. #544 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,185
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Yes, not being able to exchange shows a lack of confidence in what you are saying
    Is that right?

    Quote Originally Posted by I give myself Dutch ovens View Post
    It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasist View Post
    I ban people.
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatFowlWoman View Post
    I often have a thread ban list when I start a thread.
    Quote Originally Posted by Triggered Lizard View Post
    I don't allow racists, or haters in.
    Quote Originally Posted by Clueless View Post
    Does not seem cowardly to me. Like other mature adults who respect social etiquette, it just makes sense to exclude known racists, belligerent bigots, girlish gossipers, and libelers from civilized conversation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Somad View Post
    I thread banned his ass so he couldn't shit the place up with his stinking shit.
    Quote Originally Posted by ShitTalker View Post
    It is every poster's option to ban as many others as he/she decides. It is an exaggeration to say that anyone here is 'banning everyone.'
    Quote Originally Posted by Mcslobber View Post
    Banning all the idiots is the best first line of defense.
    Quote Originally Posted by loon View Post
    I've never put anybody on ' Ignore ' but my reserve thread ban serves useful purposes. Once you've been a member for some considerable time here you can anticipate the reaction of the forum trolls to any given topic. Sometimes you might want to investigate a topic with other reasonable members and so you post your ban to eliminate the dross from your thread
    Quote Originally Posted by Somad View Post
    There are a handful of posters here who are such good-for-nothing trolls they don't deserve to be allowed to post in my threads. Or anyone else's either. Ergo, I ban only them from every thread I start.
    Quote Originally Posted by Clueless View Post
    I only ban obvious trolls and posters who blatantly engage in overt racism, misogyny, bigotry, libel, and slander. Those are not forms of "free speech" and they are not even remotely close to conventional political speech. The only reason anyone could make it onto my thread ban list is if they are either a troll, or they are a terrible human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    The trolls often derail the thread. I think banning trolls is fine.
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatFowlWoman View Post
    If you're trying to have a serious discussion, whether it's off-topic or about politics, there are some who just cannot act like adults and should be excluded.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasist View Post
    Then I’m a coward and proud of it. I will ignore them and ban them.


    I must have missed your posts lecturing your fellow leftists about proclaiming that they put people on ignore.

    Link up.

    I'll understand if you can't, of course.

  5. #545 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17,522
    Thanks
    4,615
    Thanked 7,531 Times in 5,757 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 810 Times in 776 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Really? Does that theory apply across the board, or only to me?
    In your case, it's probably 100% accurate. For others, it depends. It's easy to fix; just explain why you decided to drag out a 2 year old thread. People can decide for themselves if it's reasonable or not.

    Of course, you can just refuse to answer, which is an answer all by itself. All I'm requesting is a better theory.
    A rule of thumb: If you're lying about nonexistent voter fraud, if you're limiting polling places, if you're forcing people to line up to vote in a pandemic, even the old and the infirm, then it seems you're basically admitting most Americans don't want you to be president.
    - Dan Rather, Jun 22, 2020

  6. #546 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,185
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    In your case, it's probably 100% accurate. For others, it depends.
    What does it depend on? Whether you agree with the person's politics or not?

  7. #547 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17,522
    Thanks
    4,615
    Thanked 7,531 Times in 5,757 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 810 Times in 776 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Is that right?

    I must have missed your posts lecturing your fellow leftists about proclaiming that they put people on ignore.

    Link up.

    I'll understand if you can't, of course.
    Lemme guess, you're lonely and tired of being threadbanned.

    I actually agree with you that it's lame. The difference between us is that you are a massive user of thread bans and I've never threadbanned anyone because I don't support it. I could even see a tit-for-tat use of threadbans against fueders, but since I've never banned anyone, much less you, that doesn't explain your reasoning for massive thread bans.

    People have to decide for themselves what they choose to do and why. Isn't that fair?
    A rule of thumb: If you're lying about nonexistent voter fraud, if you're limiting polling places, if you're forcing people to line up to vote in a pandemic, even the old and the infirm, then it seems you're basically admitting most Americans don't want you to be president.
    - Dan Rather, Jun 22, 2020

  8. #548 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,185
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    Lemme guess, you're tired of being threadbanned.
    I'm not the one complaining about threadbans. Am I?

  9. #549 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,185
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    I actually agree with you that it's lame.
    My exchange with Anchovies was about people proclaiming that they are putting someone on ignore, not threadbanning.

  10. #550 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17,522
    Thanks
    4,615
    Thanked 7,531 Times in 5,757 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 810 Times in 776 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    What does it depend on? Whether you agree with the person's politics or not?
    You seem to fear confrontation about your own "babies", your threads. The fact you refused to engage in honest, adult conversation, and this isn't the first time for you, proves you are a disingenuous and deceitful person.

    Like I said, in your case it's probably 100% accurate. The parts you refuse to answer proves what I said and are bolded below. As always, people should decide for themselves.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    In your case, it's probably 100% accurate. For others, it depends. It's easy to fix; just explain why you decided to drag out a 2 year old thread. People can decide for themselves if it's reasonable or not.

    Of course, you can just refuse to answer, which is an answer all by itself. All I'm requesting is a better theory.
    A rule of thumb: If you're lying about nonexistent voter fraud, if you're limiting polling places, if you're forcing people to line up to vote in a pandemic, even the old and the infirm, then it seems you're basically admitting most Americans don't want you to be president.
    - Dan Rather, Jun 22, 2020

  11. #551 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,185
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    You seem to fear confrontation about your own "babies", your threads.
    So you say. If that were true, wouldn't I ban the habitual trolls from every thread I start?

    Do these people "seem to fear confrontation" about their own babies, their threads?

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasist View Post
    I ban people.
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatFowlWoman View Post
    I often have a thread ban list when I start a thread.
    Quote Originally Posted by Triggered Lizard View Post
    I don't allow racists, or haters in.
    Quote Originally Posted by Clueless View Post
    Does not seem cowardly to me. Like other mature adults who respect social etiquette, it just makes sense to exclude known racists, belligerent bigots, girlish gossipers, and libelers from civilized conversation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Somad View Post
    I thread banned his ass so he couldn't shit the place up with his stinking shit.
    Quote Originally Posted by ShitTalker View Post
    It is every poster's option to ban as many others as he/she decides. It is an exaggeration to say that anyone here is 'banning everyone.'
    Quote Originally Posted by Mcslobber View Post
    Banning all the idiots is the best first line of defense.
    Quote Originally Posted by loon View Post
    I've never put anybody on ' Ignore ' but my reserve thread ban serves useful purposes. Once you've been a member for some considerable time here you can anticipate the reaction of the forum trolls to any given topic. Sometimes you might want to investigate a topic with other reasonable members and so you post your ban to eliminate the dross from your thread
    Quote Originally Posted by Somad View Post
    There are a handful of posters here who are such good-for-nothing trolls they don't deserve to be allowed to post in my threads. Or anyone else's either. Ergo, I ban only them from every thread I start.
    Quote Originally Posted by Clueless View Post
    I only ban obvious trolls and posters who blatantly engage in overt racism, misogyny, bigotry, libel, and slander. Those are not forms of "free speech" and they are not even remotely close to conventional political speech. The only reason anyone could make it onto my thread ban list is if they are either a troll, or they are a terrible human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    The trolls often derail the thread. I think banning trolls is fine.
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatFowlWoman View Post
    If you're trying to have a serious discussion, whether it's off-topic or about politics, there are some who just cannot act like adults and should be excluded.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasist View Post
    Then I’m a coward and proud of it. I will ignore them and ban them.

    In response to your question about posting in this thread, it was predicated by the death of RBG and the related discussion of the likelihood of Desh's demise in the War Zone.

    Now that I've answered your question, I'll ask mine again.

    If someone whose politics you agree with reopens an old thread, do you exhibit this kind of behavior, or not?

  12. #552 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    54,481
    Thanks
    511
    Thanked 9,495 Times in 8,128 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 460 Times in 449 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    She's banned because the thread starter is afraid of her. It happens to me a lot by JPP cowards like Teflon Don/ILA/Joe Hiden/et al, Legion and other douchebags.
    Glad you agree it's fear when it comes to the likes of Cypress, OwlWoman, LV, christiefan, et al and quite often guno, and many other douchebags banning me from their threads.

  13. #553 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17,522
    Thanks
    4,615
    Thanked 7,531 Times in 5,757 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 810 Times in 776 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Glad you agree it's fear when it comes to the likes of Cypress, OwlWoman, LV, christiefan, et al and quite often guno, and many other douchebags banning me from their threads.
    Quite being a douchebag and I'll be happy to defend you.
    A rule of thumb: If you're lying about nonexistent voter fraud, if you're limiting polling places, if you're forcing people to line up to vote in a pandemic, even the old and the infirm, then it seems you're basically admitting most Americans don't want you to be president.
    - Dan Rather, Jun 22, 2020

  14. #554 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    4,178
    Thanks
    2,962
    Thanked 2,460 Times in 1,670 Posts
    Groans
    685
    Groaned 587 Times in 505 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    I don't know what anyone will do. OTOH, the fact you dragged up a two year old thread means you are lonely and tired of playing with yourself.
    He bumps old discussions about Evince. With her not here, it makes the possibility of a little troll crush even more likely.

  15. #555 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17,522
    Thanks
    4,615
    Thanked 7,531 Times in 5,757 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 810 Times in 776 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crocodile View Post
    He bumps old discussions about Evince. With her not here, it makes the possibility of a little troll crush even more likely.
    I think his only friend is the little piece of flesh between his legs.
    A rule of thumb: If you're lying about nonexistent voter fraud, if you're limiting polling places, if you're forcing people to line up to vote in a pandemic, even the old and the infirm, then it seems you're basically admitting most Americans don't want you to be president.
    - Dan Rather, Jun 22, 2020

Similar Threads

  1. Gotta love the Fed - EVINCE/DESH IS THREAD BANNED FROM THIS THREAD
    By I Love America in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-13-2018, 11:34 PM
  2. Evince & TTQ banned?
    By Life is Golden in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-16-2017, 10:08 AM
  3. how about highlighting the threads one is banned from
    By evince in forum Introductions, User Announcements, Suggestions and General Board Discussion
    Replies: 142
    Last Post: 11-25-2013, 03:31 PM
  4. He should run for Senate - EVINCE/DESH IS BANNED FROM THIS THREAD
    By I Love America in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-25-2013, 10:25 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •