Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Dem Delegate Counter on CNN

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces New Mexico
    Posts
    10,656
    Thanks
    260
    Thanked 1,630 Times in 874 Posts
    Groans
    8
    Groaned 39 Times in 33 Posts

    Default Dem Delegate Counter on CNN

    If you look at this right here http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/...ter/index.html and play with it so that every state and all the Super D's are evenly split, not something likely to happen, Obama wins.

    Just for worst-case scenario, I figured that PA went to Clinton, waaaay bad with a 96-62 split for her, but then the following states (which the Clinton campaign has already washed their hands of, at least for now) went as follows:

    Guam 1-3 for Obama, based on other territories where he won 75%
    Indiana 30-42 for Obama, based on proximity to Illinois
    North Carolina 31-84 for Obama, based on South Carolina Virginia and Georgia
    W. VA 14-14 split, based on...who knows ???
    Kentucky 37-14 for Clinton, based on how Tenn went
    Oregon 18-34 for Obama, based on WA and also being a caucus
    Montana 4-12 for Obama, based on how well Obama has done in Idaho Wyoming and North Dakota
    S. Dakota 3-12 for Obama, se above
    Puerto Rico 28-27 split between the two, mostly for same reason as W. VA

    That then leaves the 351 uncommited SuperDelegates. Just to be really pessimistic, I figured let's say that they break 2:1 for Clinton. Granted they are almost an even split now, but let's be really pessimistic. That gives Clinton 236 and Obama 115.

    According to this nifty tool, that puts Obama at 2,030 and gives him the nomination, while Clinton still trails at 1,978, by roughly 50 votes.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    6,841
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    She's hurting.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Socrtease View Post
    If you look at this right here http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/...ter/index.html and play with it so that every state and all the Super D's are evenly split, not something likely to happen, Obama wins.

    Just for worst-case scenario, I figured that PA went to Clinton, waaaay bad with a 96-62 split for her, but then the following states (which the Clinton campaign has already washed their hands of, at least for now) went as follows:

    Guam 1-3 for Obama, based on other territories where he won 75%
    Indiana 30-42 for Obama, based on proximity to Illinois
    North Carolina 31-84 for Obama, based on South Carolina Virginia and Georgia
    W. VA 14-14 split, based on...who knows ???
    Kentucky 37-14 for Clinton, based on how Tenn went
    Oregon 18-34 for Obama, based on WA and also being a caucus
    Montana 4-12 for Obama, based on how well Obama has done in Idaho Wyoming and North Dakota
    S. Dakota 3-12 for Obama, se above
    Puerto Rico 28-27 split between the two, mostly for same reason as W. VA

    That then leaves the 351 uncommited SuperDelegates. Just to be really pessimistic, I figured let's say that they break 2:1 for Clinton. Granted they are almost an even split now, but let's be really pessimistic. That gives Clinton 236 and Obama 115.

    According to this nifty tool, that puts Obama at 2,030 and gives him the nomination, while Clinton still trails at 1,978, by roughly 50 votes.
    I think your overall numbers are probably pretty close.... but I think you Hillary with too big a lead in PA, Obama with WAY to big a lead in NC and OR... and Hillary with way to big a lead in the Supers.

    I used it and got Obama at 2057 and Hillary at 1951.

    She would have to "steal" it with the supers to win at this point.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Let's say Hillary wins or ties every primary next time around:

    Penn: 96-62 to Hillary
    Guam: 2-2 tie
    Indiana: 37-35 Hillary
    North Carolina: 63-52 Hillary
    WV: 15-13 Hillary
    Kentucky: 37-14 Hillary
    Oregon: 25-27 Hillary
    Montana: 9-7 Hillary
    SD: 8-7 Hillary
    Puerto Rico: 32-23 Hillary

    I'm being a little bit more modest in my SD's than Soc, but let's say they split 199-152 Hillary.

    That gives Hillary 2003, and Obama 2005
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    My shanty
    Posts
    52,839
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I hope Obama picks Edwards for his VP slot.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Watermark View Post
    Let's say Hillary wins or ties every primary next time around:

    Penn: 96-62 to Hillary
    Guam: 2-2 tie
    Indiana: 37-35 Hillary
    North Carolina: 63-52 Hillary
    WV: 15-13 Hillary
    Kentucky: 37-14 Hillary
    Oregon: 25-27 Hillary
    Montana: 9-7 Hillary
    SD: 8-7 Hillary
    Puerto Rico: 32-23 Hillary

    I'm being a little bit more modest in my SD's than Soc, but let's say they split 199-152 Hillary.

    That gives Hillary 2003, and Obama 2005
    In that case... Edwards delegates decide the nomination. That would be really fun.... I hope yours happens.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uscitizen View Post
    I hope Obama picks Edwards for his VP slot.
    Doubtful. He needs someone with foreign policy experience... Edwards has none.

    I think he goes with Biden. Maybe an outside chance for Richardson/Clark. Very slim dark horse chance for Webb.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces New Mexico
    Posts
    10,656
    Thanks
    260
    Thanked 1,630 Times in 874 Posts
    Groans
    8
    Groaned 39 Times in 33 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    Doubtful. He needs someone with foreign policy experience... Edwards has none.

    I think he goes with Biden. Maybe an outside chance for Richardson/Clark. Very slim dark horse chance for Webb.
    I don't think the party will want him to pick webb. He's only been in office 2 years and I don't know that Va is safe enough to remove a stable dem seat. I think it will be richardson or Biden

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Socrtease View Post
    I don't think the party will want him to pick webb. He's only been in office 2 years and I don't know that Va is safe enough to remove a stable dem seat. I think it will be richardson or Biden
    I agree.... which is why I only gave him a slim dark horse chance....
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Socrtease View Post
    I don't think the party will want him to pick webb. He's only been in office 2 years and I don't know that Va is safe enough to remove a stable dem seat. I think it will be richardson or Biden
    Webb is definitely unstable and I have doubts about whether he can keep the seat in 4 years.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lakewood, WA.
    Posts
    301
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uscitizen View Post
    I hope Obama picks Edwards for his VP slot.
    Me too!
    Geroge W. Bush is a false Christian, yet became a 2 term president. Mike Huckubee is a true Christian, yet has been ignored.

    Jesus was a Socialist, therefore, so am I!

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    6,269
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    i herd thru the grape vine that if Hillary's plan to seize power is failing and the Florida and Michigan scams dont work... shes looking to have Puerto Rico change there vote to a winner takes all delegates contest.


    i know the clinton campaign has already had them change there contest from a caucus to a primary and moved the date up 5 days..
    Last edited by Chapdog; 03-13-2008 at 06:27 AM.

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,212
    Thanks
    9,841
    Thanked 33,910 Times in 21,670 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    It will be Obama. The question is if she will hurt him enough to cost Americans an Obama presidency, and force us to live with four more years of Bush/Cheney/McCain!
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    My shanty
    Posts
    52,839
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Will Cheny pick Condalizard as his VP to get black and womens vote ?
    I doubt it, but the darn repubs are panicky.

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    85,178
    Thanks
    2,510
    Thanked 16,610 Times in 10,571 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 578 Times in 535 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Watermark View Post
    Webb is definitely unstable and I have doubts about whether he can keep the seat in 4 years.
    If there is real doubt of that they might pick him so that it does not appear that he loses elections.
    Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
    - -- Aristotle

    Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
    - -- The Buddha

    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    - -- Aristotle

Similar Threads

  1. Obama Camp Runs to Clinton to Counter Palin
    By RockX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-05-2008, 08:50 PM
  2. Dem calls Hillary delegate "Uncle Tom"
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-26-2008, 03:05 PM
  3. Clinton, Romney top early CNN delegate survey
    By Topspin in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-07-2008, 04:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •