Alabama cops tackle, arrest black woman in Waffle House over ‘the f-bomb’

[Cancel 2019.1]

Kellyanne Conway has nice boobs as well as a nice ass and nice personality.

If you like droopy eye,pathological liars.

[BodyDouble]

If you like droopy eye,pathological liars.

She shits on the likes of you.

[SmarterthanYou]

I'll answer your question with an answer that applies, not the one you want me to choose from. A Cop won't ask you to drop your drawers and bend over so that question is actually bunk.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-dashcam-video

https://www.vox.com/2015/5/11/858613...-cavity-search

http://www.houstonpress.com/news/war...tional-7663955

wanna try that again?

In the case of this uppity fat pig at the restaurant, she was breaking several laws and got what was coming to her. The outcome would have been the same if all the Cops were black.

so You DO approve of extracurricular punishment of people who don't immediately drop to their knees at a government command. got it.

[USFREEDOM911]

Asserting your rights to be left alone by the police is not resisting. If you do not peacefully stand up for your rights, they will be gone. Not just her rights, but all of ours.;

When you fail to control yourself, you then allow others to control the "situation".

[Nordberg]

When you fail to control yourself, you then allow others to control the "situation".

Yep, just let the police bully you and take away your rights. That is what you would do.

[Sirthinksalot]

Yep, just let the police bully you and take away your rights. That is what you would do.

What right did they take away? No one has the right to drunkenly berate a server at a restaurant, then refuse to leave when asked.

[Leonthecat]

If you like droopy eye,pathological liars.

Who look remarkably like Beavis;





Hehahaha heh heh Kewl!

[USFREEDOM911]

that either doesn't answer the question or you are quietly trying to say that police can escalate the use of force for a passive but non compliant civilian. am I right?

If it's warranted.

If you resist by not putting your hands behind your back, then they're going to do it for you.
If you then resist them putting your hands behind your back, then they're going to do what ever is necessary to reach the objective.

[USFREEDOM911]

so when they tell you to drop your drawers and bend over??????? simple yes or no will suffice. or when they arrest you for NOT breaking a law? because i've seen it happen...........simple yes or no

That would be an illegal order.
Being told to put your hands behind your back, is not an illegal order.

Or are you unable to see the difference.

[SmarterthanYou]

If it's warranted.

If you resist by not putting your hands behind your back, then they're going to do it for you.
If you then resist them putting your hands behind your back, then they're going to do what ever is necessary to reach the objective.

but YOU have stated an understanding of the use of force doctrine. I'm SPECIFICALLY referring to those that feel an ass beating is warranted above the force necessary simply because a person didn't do what they were told.

[Sirthinksalot]

here is my experience regarding incidents like this. When the civilian is completely in the wrong, antagonistic or violent from the start, the police will happily release body cam footage or other such sources as proof that they acted accordingly......but when the cops actions are questionable or even overtly wrong, then body cams broke or weren't turned on. audio tapes are accidentally deleted, or some other shit that happens that doesn't show what the cops prior actions were.........so while it might be apathetically easy to accept the governments narrative or excuses, it becomes awfully convenient to ignore that the governments recordings aren't relevant in the big picture of things. Then I also have to take in to account the sub conscious mindsets of people who are sheeple to readily accept that government agents can become violent lawbreakers on their own part, all so said civilian can feel good about their government keeping them safe.

Perhaps you missed the surveillance video from the restaurant? You can clearly see the woman standing up and repeatedly thrusting her finger in the employee's face. Servers put up with a lot of crap, and their only recourse is to ask obnoxious patrons to leave, which most patrons do when asked. She had walked to the door, then decided to come back in for more conflict. The woman got arrested because of her own poor choices. Not sure who you're referring to when you say "sheeple". If you mean anyone who doesn't identify as a sovereign citizen, well again we can agree to disagree.

[SmarterthanYou]

That would be an illegal order.
Being told to put your hands behind your back, is not an illegal order.

Or are you unable to see the difference.

I am able to make that distinction. sirthinksalot apparently doesn't care....which is who i was responding to

[Sirthinksalot]

do police have the right to ignore the law by escalating the use of force when not warranted or use excessive force?

No, and there is no evidence that they did that in the case we are discussing.

[SmarterthanYou]

Perhaps you missed the surveillance video from the restaurant?

didn't watch it. didn't need to. my only issue here is did the cops follow their use of force doctrine or did they apply a little 'you better listen to us' punishment just because they are the law

[SmarterthanYou]

No, and there is no evidence that they did that in the case we are discussing.

so threats of breaking bones is within the professionalism of law enforcement? ask me again why I don't respect government or cops.