Reply With QuoteOriginally Posted by USFREEDOM911
Which still has nothing to do with you asserting that it occurred DURING the funeral.
It's good that you found the off-ramp without crashing ....
Verified User
Some folk just reflexively side, blindly, with big govt regardless of the circumstances.
In Yo Face!
Which still has nothing to do with you asserting that it occurred DURING the funeral.
It's good that you found the off-ramp without crashing ....
ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
And some people, like Bourbon, just reflexively make up things that have nothing to do with the facts.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
In Yo Face!
He's having difficulty's measuring up ...
ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Your reply was a non sequitur.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
rebel
if someone can actually dig in to this more, i'm curious if they did this at the actual memorial/viewing, at the funeral, or just because it was there.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Note my apathy
The cops are the ones responsible for the guy being in the funeral home. And it was for the offense of, "driving away" before they had a chance to search him. What evidence could they have been seeking? Their action looks like a CYA attempt gone wrong.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
They did it at the funeral home; but the funeral was not being conducted at that time.
The body was there, in preparation for the funeral.
Bourbon just drew the conclusion that it HAD to be during the funeral; because the body was AT the funeral home.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
fully immersed in faith..
your article does not say it happened during the funeral....do you have something to back up your claim?......LARGO, Fla. -- Florida authorities went to a funeral home and used a dead man's finger to try to unlock his cellphone as part of an investigation.
Thirty-year-old Linus Phillip was killed by a Largo police officer last month after, authorities say, he tried to drive away before an officer could search him.
At the funeral home, two detectives held the man's hands up to the phone's fingerprint sensor, but could not unlock it.
Phillip's fiancée, Victoria Armstrong, says she felt violated and disrespected.
Legal experts mostly agree that what the detectives did was legal, but they question whether it was appropriate.
Charles Rose, a professor at Stetson University College of Law, tells the Tampa Bay Times dead people can't assert their Fourth Amendment protections because you can't own property when you're dead. But those rights could apply to whoever inherits the property.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/police-...his-cellphone/
Legal or not; couldn't the Police have found a more appropriate time to do this search?
Say, like before or after the funeral, it's not like the guys is going anywhere soon.
fully immersed in faith..
suck it....Barbecue Sauce on your fingers totally Fucks things up ...
fully immersed in faith..
/shrugs.....three pages and still no proof......sounds like a Jarod thread.......
rebel
They did it at the funeral home; but the funeral was not being conducted at that time.
The body was there, in preparation for the funeral.
Bourbon just drew the conclusion that it HAD to be during the funeral; because the body was AT the funeral home.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Verified User
How could that be done respectfully?
rebel
well, your first mistake is thinking that government would be respectful.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Banned
The way it was done. Nothing disrespectful about it.
Posting Rules
Bookmarks