Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 58

Thread: "GOP split as banks take on gun industry"

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    free enterprise is great. discrimination is not......or should bakers be allowed to deny making wedding cakes for certain couples now?
    Saw that coming, the banks are refusing to do business with another business, purely economic, can't make a business do business with a failing customer, the bakers would be denying an individual his rights as a citizen, big difference

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (04-23-2018)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8,490
    Thanks
    796
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 2,409 Posts
    Groans
    376
    Groaned 244 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    They are not blacklisting, they'd just rather not do business with them, and you can't say they are depriving any individual of their rights as a citizen - (anticipating the next conservative exchange)
    I didn't say they were denying anybody a right. We refuse to lend money to gun manufacturers sounds like blacklisting to me.

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,769 Times in 27,243 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    you don't have a clue about the constitution, except to use it as a weapon against those you hate, racist
    you are not the final arbiter of what the constitution says

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    14,239
    Thanks
    1,579
    Thanked 4,734 Times in 3,515 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 291 Times in 282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    I thought liberals claim Republicans walk in lock step. Also, don't you guys support "boycotts"?

    And what is your basis that the left's boogeyman NRA hates those kids?
    Relax, the gun lobby works with "both" partys.

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,769 Times in 27,243 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kacper View Post
    I didn't say they were denying anybody a right. We refuse to lend money to gun manufacturers sounds like blacklisting to me.
    the financial danger is too large

  7. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,769 Times in 27,243 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  8. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,769 Times in 27,243 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Saw that coming, the banks are refusing to do business with another business, purely economic, can't make a business do business with a failing customer, the bakers would be denying an individual his rights as a citizen, big difference
    and the NRA is about to be busted by the feds


    making it even more dangerous to loan to them

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (04-23-2018)

  10. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    "Major banks are cutting off business with the gun industry, roiling Republicans who want to respect the financial decisions of private institutions while still showing their unyielding support of the Second Amendment."

    "Some Republicans, enraged at moves by Citigroup and Bank of America to distance themselves from some retailers and gun manufacturers, have called on government agencies to cancel contracts with the banks and defer deregulation proposals that would benefit them. But other Republicans want to keep their hands off, saying lenders are free to decide who they do business with."

    "Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana, who has asked an expanding list of federal and state officials to cut off the banks from government contracts. He has also discouraged Republican leadership from taking up regulatory rollbacks that would benefit banks’ trading operations. He has also suggested that Citi might be running afoul of federal, state and local laws."

    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...p-split-544739

    Looks like we got a conundrum for the gun loving conservatives, do they support employing the Gov't to pressure banks into doing business with the gun industry, or, do they support capitalism's tenent of free enterprise without Gov't interference?

    Does show one phenomena not possible even five years ago, it isn't the political sphere that are forcing recognition of a gun problem in America but rather economic and social currents are highlighting the realities. The NRA has to really really hate those high school kids from Florida
    banks are cutting off business with the gun industry, roiling Republicans who want to respect the financial decisions of private institutions
    while still showing their unyielding support against discrimination.....maybe next time banks will be cutting off business with black people....or maybe Planned Parenthood.
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  11. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    14,239
    Thanks
    1,579
    Thanked 4,734 Times in 3,515 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 291 Times in 282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    see you hate everyone
    Actually I look at everyone equally. They do what they do and I observe that. Partisanshitheads always struggle with that, again, because it does not comport with your labelling paradigm.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fentoine Lum For This Post:

    Controlled Opposition (04-22-2018), Sailor (04-22-2018)

  13. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,769 Times in 27,243 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  14. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Don't know anything about the "lock step" whatever, but this certainly puts a gun loving conservative in a difficult position, well, that's if they actually believe all the stuff they tell us makes them a conservative

    And "basis that the NRA hates those kids," easy, already told you, "it isn't the political sphere that are forcing recognition of a gun problem in America but rather economic and social currents," events and forces outside of the political sphere beyond the control or influence of the NRA
    What? So because others are forcing recognition of gun problems, means the NRA hates those kids?

    That makes zero sense.

  15. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kacper View Post
    I didn't say they were denying anybody a right. We refuse to lend money to gun manufacturers sounds like blacklisting to me.
    If you were a banker would you do business with another business that wasn't do all that well and that your customers weren't that fond of, to borrow the line from the Godfather, "it's just business"

  16. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8,490
    Thanks
    796
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 2,409 Posts
    Groans
    376
    Groaned 244 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    If you were a banker would you do business with another business that wasn't do all that well and that your customers weren't that fond of, to borrow the line from the Godfather, "it's just business"
    If I were a bank, I wouldn't blacklist an entire legal industry, nor should it be allowed to.

  17. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    What? So because others are forcing recognition of gun problems, means the NRA hates those kids?

    That makes zero sense.
    Not at all, because of those kids the issue has moved beyond the political arena where the NRA had influence, as we see here with the banks and others as retailers Dicks and even Walmart, were the NRA is a total non factor. Without those kids, it would still be in realm they could control, not any longer

    Really not that difficult

  18. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kacper View Post
    If I were a bank, I wouldn't blacklist an entire legal industry, nor should it be allowed to.
    Again, they are not blacklisting them, just finding other customers they rather deal with, no law says a business has to do business with another business

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (04-23-2018)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-03-2018, 04:10 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-11-2016, 03:48 AM
  3. A world with "no landlords, no bosses, no banks"
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-20-2012, 08:17 PM
  4. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-24-2009, 09:14 PM
  5. The Industry "self regulation" has been played...and it failed
    By Cypress in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-03-2008, 08:53 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •