Illinois county declares itself a SANCTUARY COUNTY for gun owners - HAHAHA

[countryboy]

I see you also fail to find that citation.

This forum is full of RW losers.

LWNJ definition of "RW losers", anyone to the right of Chairman Mao.

[domer76]

LWNJ definition of "RW losers", anyone to the right of Chairman Mao.

Just find the citation, moron.

[SmarterthanYou]

Jury nullification cannot strike down laws or actions of an excessive government that do not involve criminal or civil court proceedings. The people sure didn't stop D. C. from banning handguns but the Supreme Court did.

almost all judges routinely instruct juries that they cannot judge the law, only judge the facts based upon how the judge explains the law to the jury. This, in effect, keeps jurors from understanding that they have a right to nullify a jury. That is we the peoples fault of ignoring the usurpation of the courts.

[SmarterthanYou]

So how does a constitutional violation get adjudicated? Are you saying every single citizen decides? So you ha e over 300 million decisions that everyone must abide by?

ever hear of jury trials? in a criminal trial, all you need is one.

[Fentoine Lum]

Yup- everybody can play that game.

Nah, they can't, only some can, but that's how american "works".

[Cancel 2018.2]

ever hear of jury trials? in a criminal trial, all you need is one.

You honestly think a jury, made up of probably some totally ignorant people, should decide the fate of the nation?

Let's flesh this out. Can the decision be appealed, if not why, if yes, to whom? Is another in paneled jury bound by stare decises?

Would you be comfortable with a jury made up entirely of Evinces to rule on gun laws?

[Text Drivers are Killers]

almost all judges routinely instruct juries that they cannot judge the law, only judge the facts based upon how the judge explains the law to the jury. This, in effect, keeps jurors from understanding that they have a right to nullify a jury. That is we the peoples fault of ignoring the usurpation of the courts.

Yup - juries can do whatever they want. If the jury wants to interpret the law, there is nothing the judge can do to stop them.

[PraiseKek]

Yeah, that sanctuary city bs to circumvent the law is a slippery slope.

Except this comports with the Federal Constitution and Supremacy Clause; whereas, the sanctuary city laws for illegal immigrants is an overt violation of federal law and the Constitutional authority of the Congress to set national immigration and naturalization policy.

[PraiseKek]

Nah, they can't, only some can, but that's how american "works".

Ya illegal border hopping Spics can't you rapefufee faggot.

[SmarterthanYou]

You honestly think a jury, made up of probably some totally ignorant people, should decide the fate of the nation?

is it not THEIR nation as well? or should we consider the majority of our population too stupid now and scrap said constitution in favor of government permissions?

Let's flesh this out. Can the decision be appealed, if not why, if yes, to whom? Is another in paneled jury bound by stare decises?

what decision? and juries are not bound by stare decisis, only the courts are.

Would you be comfortable with a jury made up entirely of Evinces to rule on gun laws?

that's why lawyers get to have questions answered so they can choose jurors to their likings.

[Fentoine Lum]

Ya illegal border hopping Spics can't you rapefufee faggot.

Anyone want to interpret this screed? Is he looking for cock?

[Cancel 2018.2]

is it not THEIR nation as well? or should we consider the majority of our population too stupid now and scrap said constitution in favor of government permissions?

what decision? and juries are not bound by stare decisis, only the courts are.


that's why lawyers get to have questions answered so they can choose jurors to their likings.

1. Should we allow anyone to be a doctor? And yes, it our Republic. I know you know what that means.

2. If they are not bound, then there is chaos in the law and thus society. I'm sure you're aware of the quote... Without law there is chaos. A jury from Maine could decide that guns should be outlawed and then a jury from Texas decides otherwise. That is chaos.

3. If you don't want judges interpreting the constitution, why do you want lawyers determining which citizens interpret the law? Seems that the EB and Congress already do that.

[SmarterthanYou]

1. Should we allow anyone to be a doctor? And yes, it our Republic. I know you know what that means.

everyone should have the opportunity to go to med school and try to be a doctor.

2. If they are not bound, then there is chaos in the law and thus society. I'm sure you're aware of the quote... Without law there is chaos. A jury from Maine could decide that guns should be outlawed and then a jury from Texas decides otherwise. That is chaos.

how does a jury decide that guns should be outlawed?

3. If you don't want judges interpreting the constitution, why do you want lawyers determining which citizens interpret the law? Seems that the EB and Congress already do that.

because we have a right to trial by a jury of our peers.........or were you not aware of that?

[katzgar]

We keep explaining to you that you just look like a moron when you quote Breitbart but you keep quoting Breitbart your self-destructive tendencies are concerning

[floridafan]

Yup - juries can do whatever they want. If the jury wants to interpret the law, there is nothing the judge can do to stop them.

Yes, a judge can overrule a jury:

A judge may only throw out guilty verdicts. He may never overrule a jury that acquits a defendant and then himself declare the defendant guilty. ... Alternatively, a judge can throw out a verdict for any mistake or malfeasance that might prompt a higher court to overturn it.