solid proof of evolution

[PostmodernProphet]

Nothing ironic about it, because it's not 100% "faith."

really?.......you have some evidence you're been holding out on us?.....

[PostmodernProphet]

Of course, if you read about the judgment in Matthew 25, faith doesn't matter. All that matters is how we treat others.

sorry that you do not understand the book of Matthew.......

[PostmodernProphet]

I'm not sure what you're saying; are you suggesting that there is no evidence for evolution?

there is no evidence that man evolved from a single celled creature.....

[PostmodernProphet]

Yet most Christians insist that the Bible was inpired by God and is inerrant.

I'm more inclined to say that what you claim about the Bible is errant......

[PostmodernProphet]

Wouldn't those aliens have found a way to provide proof of their existence by now if they were out there?

why?.....we don't have a way to prove our existence to them......

[PostmodernProphet]

Sorry, Darth - you're the one who misread PMP's post that started the exchange. He was talking about man evolving from a single-celled organism. Not about the inception of that single-celled organism.

and obviously you misread it as well, because you thought I was denying evolution......

[PostmodernProphet]

Which set of evidence are you addressing?

thing never addresses evidence.....

[PostmodernProphet]

but there is a ridiculous amount of evidence for it after that.

show me a falsifiable experiment to demonstrate humans evolved from the first vertebrate .....if you cannot, there is NO evidence......

[Nordberg]

Unless you have proof of life on other planets to the degree you expect God to provide it to you, it's wishful thinking. If there was life on those other planets, wouldn't you think that life would have found a way to show its existence by now?

no. Distances are too far. Alpha Centauri, our nearest galaxy neighbor is 4.4 light years away. We could go there , if we have 100 years to do it. Then a message sent back would take 4.5 years.

[Darth Omar]

Scientifically, not even close.

But as strictly a philosophical matter, it’s quite rational to infer design based on the evidence.

Why is that so threatening to some people?

[Micawber]

View First Unread
Thread Tools
Search Thread
Rate This Thread
Display
Today, 12:46 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:47 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:49 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:52 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:54 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:55 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:56 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:59 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.

[Cancel 2020.1]

But as strictly a philosophical matter, it’s quite rational to infer design based on the evidence.

Why is that so threatening to some people?

I'm not threatened by it, and I'm not talking philosophy - I'm talking strictly in terms of the science.

I actually think it's the scientific aspect that some find threatening.

[Darth Omar]

I'm not threatened by it, and I'm not talking philosophy - I'm talking strictly in terms of the science.

I actually think it's the scientific aspect that some find threatening.

‘Rational’ isn’t the sole provenance of science.

It’s entirely rational to infer a Creator—based on the evidence of science. Some people find that threatening.

[Nordberg]

But as strictly a philosophical matter, it’s quite rational to infer design based on the evidence.

Why is that so threatening to some people?

No it is not. Philosophy answers questions. it does not formulate more. Is it rational to infer a collection of gods made the universe?

[Darth Omar]

No it is not. Philosophy answers questions. it does not formulate more. Is it rational to infer a collection of gods made the universe?

Philosophy leads to conclusions.

In this instance, an inference to design based on the evidence of science.