Hillary Clinton's popularity has plunged since election, poll finds

[CFM]

how old is Hilary?

Only 8 months younger than Reagan, someone you leftwingers said was too old to be President, had she been elected.

[Mason Michaels]

I have no idea why you believe that was her best chance to win. Bush won 31 states and 286 Electoral delegates. Bush had a 62% average approval rating over his first term. He was treated with white gloves by the media during that election as a post-9/11, We are at War guilt I guess. There is no way she could have beaten him. Nobody could have beaten him that year. Things didn't turn sideways for his presidency until after the re-election. That was when the media and the public turned against Iraq.

The country was turning against the war.The Democrats ran a unpopular Wooden Indian,who didn't defend himself against swift boat!
She had ever chance to win,much better than Kerry.
She would have made Bush look stupid in debates!

[Mason Michaels]

Only 8 months younger than Reagan, someone you leftwingers said was too old to be President, had she been elected.

Reagan was to old,so was Hillary last time,more so in 2020.

[evince]

then so was Bernie and so was Biden

[evince]

The country was turning against the war.The Democrats ran a unpopular Wooden Indian,who didn't defend himself against swift boat!
She had ever chance to win,much better than Kerry.
She would have made Bush look stupid in debates!

HE WAS CHEATED


the republican party was cheating in elections

[CFM]

Reagan was to old,so was Hillary last time,more so in 2020.

I'm not looking at it from the standpoint of chronological age but of the hypocrisy by those that said at 69 years, 11 months Reagan was too old yet at 69 years, 3 month Hillary wasn't too old.

[evince]

Only 8 months younger than Reagan, someone you leftwingers said was too old to be President, had she been elected.

link

[Irish Exit]

The country was turning against the war.The Democrats ran a unpopular Wooden Indian,who didn't defend himself against swift boat!
She had ever chance to win,much better than Kerry.
She would have made Bush look stupid in debates!

Changing Administrations in the middle of a war and control of the government would have been seen as betraying the troops; Bush beat Gore because of the anti-Clinton sentiments to begin with. Bush wouldn't have lost.

[CFM]

link

Look it up yourself. Hillary was born in October, 1947. Reagan was born in February, 1911. If you can't do the math, that's your problem.

[dukkha]

Only 27 percent of those polled had a very or somewhat positive view of the former secretary of state,

[Mason Michaels]

Changing Administrations in the middle of a war and control of the government would have been seen as betraying the troops; Bush beat Gore because of the anti-Clinton sentiments to begin with. Bush wouldn't have lost.

You don't know that,I don't know that,either way,Bushes second term was Hillary 's best chance and she didn't even try.
As for Gore,one he won,two he distanced himself from the Clinton's bad mistake!

[Mason Michaels]

Changing Administrations in the middle of a war and control of the government would have been seen as betraying the troops; Bush beat Gore because of the anti-Clinton sentiments to begin with. Bush wouldn't have lost.

Your information sounds like Fox anti-Clinton bullshit

[Fentoine Lum]

Wow, she had higher favorability than Trump before the election and still lost. And she's the dims' front runner for 2020 (I assume).
Looks like her campaign is going worse than the first two.
I've been saying the only way I vote for Trump in 2020 is if dims run someone as bad as hrc. And only hrc is as bad as hrc. Maybe hrc 3.0 is actually worse than hrc 2.0.

Suit yourself, you'll get a cabal of Goldman Sachs execs in the white house, endless war, and the continued societal wealth extraction, concentration and redistribution "either" way, same as it ever was.

[Irish Exit]

You don't know that,I don't know that,either way,Bushes second term was Hillary 's best chance and she didn't even try.
As for Gore,one he won,two he distanced himself from the Clinton's bad mistake!

Because she would have lost. Funny that you acknowledge you don't know that and then claim to know that would have been her best shot. Incumbents seldom lose, and Bush had a 50-60% approval rating throughout the fall of 2004. http://news.gallup.com/poll/116500/p...orge-bush.aspx

Even New Yorkers preferred Bush over Clinton in that 2004 time frame http://www.foxnews.com/story/2003/04...n-in-2004.html

[Irish Exit]

Your information sounds like Fox anti-Clinton bullshit

It is what the data shows. Your Hillary Could Haves/Should Haves are not supported by anything other than that you heart Hillary and can't accept that she got her arse handed to her twice.