cancel2 2022 (04-17-2018)
Members banned from this thread: Cancel 2018. 3, USFREEDOM911, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Truth Detector, canceled.2021.1, canceled.2021.2, MAGA MAN, canceled.2021.3, transwarpdrive, Text Drivers are Killers, CFM, Ralph, Cancel 2018.2, Sailor, PraiseKek, Eagle_Eye, countryboy, Q-Tip, volsrock, The Ugly Truth and BodyDouble |
cancel2 2022 (04-17-2018)
I suppose that could be true - but only as much as it agrees with your reality, where trump is an amazing hero. I'd imagine you're wondering how it can only be in the low 50's, and why he isn't near 99%, with desh & I being among the few lone holdouts who don't see his amazing heroicness.
Leonthecat (04-17-2018), Phantasmal (04-17-2018)
And still picked Clinton over trump.
"Rasmussen Reports’ final White House Watch survey shows Democrat Hillary Clinton with a two-point lead over Republican Donald Trump with less than 24 hours to go until Election Day. Among early voters, Clinton has a double-digit lead."
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
Joe Capitalist (04-17-2018)
anatta (04-17-2018)
Of course....
1) This surmises the point quite nicely
https://www.usnews.com/news/the-repo...gly-inaccurate
2) This discusses the problems with the survey questions and how meaning can be distorted, the construction of surveys are so varied, the inconsistency in data etc...
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/p...-and-the-ugly/
The premise of my point does not require academic nor website approval, rather is quite blatant in nature. How can a survey accurately depict the entire populations views on a given political figure, when selection are so narrowed and limited in nature. No doubt they have their formulas and different measurements but the question is how consistent are these, and after reviewing data reading such articles as above consistency and accuracy are lacking.
cancel2 2022 (04-18-2018)
Frank Apisa (04-18-2018), Phantasmal (04-18-2018)
Bookmarks