Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: BREAKING NEWS: Sean Hannity is Trump's little whore and Michael Cohen is the pimp.

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,111
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,364 Times in 6,036 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default BREAKING NEWS: Sean Hannity is Trump's little whore and Michael Cohen is the pimp.

    FoxNews (April 17th, 2018) - Fox host Sean Hannity just helped the government's case against President Donald Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, tremendously. Even irony itself was not prepared for that development.

    Courtroom drama peaked Monday at a hearing in lower Manhattan when Michael Cohen's lawyer, Stephen Ryan, reluctantly revealed to Judge Kimba Wood -- a judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York -- that Cohen's mystery third client was Hannity, the bombastic, unconditional champion of citizen-turned-candidate-turned-President, Donald Trump.
    But the shock of that third-client revelation paled in comparison to Hannity's shocking denial, soon after, that he and Michael Cohen were ever in an attorney-client relationship.
    In fact, while responding on his radio show to news that he had been identified as one of Cohen's three clients, Hannity explicitly stated that he was never represented by nor had he ever retained Cohen. He bent over backwards to deny the relationship, claiming nothing more than a few harmless chit-chats over real estate.
    In an effort to distinguish his interactions with Cohen from those of Trump and Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy (the other two clients), Hannity implied that his own exchanges with Cohen did not entail the silencing of any alleged sexual partner, as these exchanges did not involve any third party.

    Said Hannity, on his radio show Monday: "Not one of any issue I ever dealt with Michael Cohen on ever -- ever -- involved a matter between me and any third party." Although he later clarified his comments to suggest that he expected that some of his conversations with Cohen would be confidential, his earlier denial that a relationship ever existed renders that expectation unpersuasive. It is gratuitous doublespeak.
    Hannity's denial fatally undermined any credible claim by Cohen that their communications were protected from disclosure by the attorney client privilege. The privilege extends to only those private conversations that take place within an established attorney-client relationship, and even then, those conversations must specifically pertain to legal advice. The privilege does not extend to conversations simply because one of its participants happens to be an attorney.
    Interestingly enough, this is precisely what the government argued in favor of the disclosure of Cohen's communications with other purported clients. To get the search warrant in the first place, the government had to have convinced the court that Cohen and his so-called clients were not actually in an attorney-client relationship, and therefore their conversations were not privileged.

    Hannity just confirmed that to be true, at least with respect to himself. That certainly undermined the credibility of Cohen and perhaps explains why Cohen wanted to keep their relationship confidential.
    But even if an attorney-client relationship between Cohen and Hannity did actually exist, it is the client, not the attorney, who controls the disclosure of communication. Even if Cohen wanted to disclose the discussions, he would only be allowed to do so if Hannity agreed to it.
    But in this case, Hannity isn't asserting the privilege, so Cohen lacks any basis not to disclose the information or to prevent the government from looking at any communications between himself and Hannity.
    The accidental client is a legal possibility. It is an attorney's responsibility to confirm the existence of an attorney-client relationship or clarify someone's confusion as to whether one exists. But the notion of an accidental attorney is a legal absurdity. And yet, that is the very absurdity on which Cohen rests his claim.
    In a political world of legal semantics and lawerly answers that hedge more than they clarify, some things are unmistakably clear: if a client doesn't think you are his attorney, you're not.

    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Joe Capitalist For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (04-17-2018), kudzu (04-17-2018), ThatOwlWoman (04-17-2018)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,766 Times in 27,240 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (04-17-2018), kudzu (04-17-2018), ThatOwlWoman (04-17-2018)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Not a Good Week for Trump and it's ONLY Tuesday
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bourbon For This Post:

    evince (04-17-2018), Guno צְבִי (04-17-2018), ThatOwlWoman (04-17-2018)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,111
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,364 Times in 6,036 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    Not a Good Week for Trump and it's ONLY Tuesday
    It'll get worse for the Orange Turd before it gets better.

    And it will get MUCH WORSE.

    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Joe Capitalist For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (04-17-2018)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,766 Times in 27,240 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,111
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,364 Times in 6,036 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    this is the beginning of the end of the Fox "news" run
    FoxNews = the National Enquirer of Cable News:

    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


Similar Threads

  1. SEAN HANNITY and the "pussygrabber" share the same ATTORNEY--Cohen!!
    By Centerleftfl in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 04-17-2018, 03:20 PM
  2. Stormy Daniels sues Trump lawyer Michael Cohen for defamation
    By floridafan in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 03-27-2018, 06:36 AM
  3. A furiously Sean Hannity attacks Anti-Trump Media
    By Tomas Fabregas in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-12-2018, 09:13 PM
  4. Sean Hannity attacks journalists for criticizing Donald Trump
    By Tomas Fabregas in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 02-08-2018, 07:13 AM
  5. Ex-Fox News Contributor Accuses Sean Hannity Of Sexual Harassment
    By Buckly J. Ewer in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-25-2017, 06:45 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •