KNOW YOUR RIGHTS! KNOW THE LAW!

[SmarterthanYou]

and stop letting the government brainwash your idiot asses that they know the constitution better than you.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137: “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.”

Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105: “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.”

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262: “If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.”

Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622: “Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.”

Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 1974: Expounds upon Owen Byers v. U.S., 273 U.S. 28 Unlawful search and seizure. Your rights must be interpreted in favor of the citizen.

Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616: “The court is to protect against any encroachment of Constitutionally secured liberties.”

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436: “Where rights secured (Affirmed) by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.”

Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425: “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486, 489: “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.”

Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748: “Waivers of Constitutional Rights, not only must they be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness.” “If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being a gift of ALMIGHTY GOD, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.” —Samuel Adams, 1772

Cohens v. Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821): “When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.”

Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237, 243: “We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.”

S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905): “The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.”

[Bourbon]

[SmarterthanYou]

just kidding LOL

[Mr.Badguy]

[Bigdog]

Know the law, but don't try to litigate your case on the street with a cop. Wait until you go to court.

[Mr.Badguy]

Know the law, but don't try to litigate your case on the street with a cop. Wait until you go to court.

Just like a statist, giving in to unlawful demands of your statist overlords. The status of your statist statism is that it's not in stasis. STATIST!!!

[Leonthecat]

[Frank Apisa]

Know the law, but don't try to litigate your case on the street with a cop. Wait until you go to court.

Spectacular advice, Dog.

If a cop tell you to sit down...don't waste time looking for a chair. Just sit down.

Why people argue and get themselves shot is beyond me.

Don't get me wrong...I hate when someone tells me what to do...ESPECIALLY if I know I am in the right.

But if the offending party is a cop...we do what the cop says and argue about it later in front of a judge.

[Bigdog]

Just like a statist, giving in to unlawful demands of your statist overlords. The status of your statist statism is that it's not in stasis. STATIST!!!

You are dangerous. Advice like yours gets citizens killed by police.

Take the case of this 17 year old white kid that thought he was a lawyer like youi.


"Guilford had recently become interested in civil liberties, particularly with respect to citizen-police interactions. It also appears that he had read some bad advice. In the video, Guilford tells the officer that he isn’t obligated to provide his driver’s license. (Local columnist Judy Putnam reports that Guilford was driving from his girlfriend’s house to a church basketball game and had simply forgotten his license at her home.) This is incorrect. In most places, a driver is obligated to provide a license and registration (and in some states, proof of insurance) when been pulled over, even if the police officer lacked cause for the underlying stop.


But even if Guilford had been correct about his rights, as lots of other motorists have in similar videos posted online, many would argue that he shouldn’t have argued with the cop at the time. The time to make your case about your rights is afterward, in court. That’s obviously sound advice on one very basic level — had he done that, Guilford would still be alive today."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.d0112ff0a4db

[hvilleherb]

Gotta get Miranda overturned.

[Mr.Badguy]

You are dangerous. Advice like yours gets citizens killed by police.

Take the case of this 17 year old white kid that thought he was a lawyer like youi.


"Guilford had recently become interested in civil liberties, particularly with respect to citizen-police interactions. It also appears that he had read some bad advice. In the video, Guilford tells the officer that he isn’t obligated to provide his driver’s license. (Local columnist Judy Putnam reports that Guilford was driving from his girlfriend’s house to a church basketball game and had simply forgotten his license at her home.) This is incorrect. In most places, a driver is obligated to provide a license and registration (and in some states, proof of insurance) when been pulled over, even if the police officer lacked cause for the underlying stop.


But even if Guilford had been correct about his rights, as lots of other motorists have in similar videos posted online, many would argue that he shouldn’t have argued with the cop at the time. The time to make your case about your rights is afterward, in court. That’s obviously sound advice on one very basic level — had he done that, Guilford would still be alive today."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.d0112ff0a4db

*Whoosh*

[Mr.Badguy]

Just some good ol' boys
Never meanin' no harm
Beats all you ever saw
Got in trouble with the law
Up in chilly Dearborn

[domer76]

You are dangerous. Advice like yours gets citizens killed by police.

Take the case of this 17 year old white kid that thought he was a lawyer like youi.


"Guilford had recently become interested in civil liberties, particularly with respect to citizen-police interactions. It also appears that he had read some bad advice. In the video, Guilford tells the officer that he isn’t obligated to provide his driver’s license. (Local columnist Judy Putnam reports that Guilford was driving from his girlfriend’s house to a church basketball game and had simply forgotten his license at her home.) This is incorrect. In most places, a driver is obligated to provide a license and registration (and in some states, proof of insurance) when been pulled over, even if the police officer lacked cause for the underlying stop.


But even if Guilford had been correct about his rights, as lots of other motorists have in similar videos posted online, many would argue that he shouldn’t have argued with the cop at the time. The time to make your case about your rights is afterward, in court. That’s obviously sound advice on one very basic level — had he done that, Guilford would still be alive today."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.d0112ff0a4db

Sounds a lot like your idiot buddy, Smarter-than-a-yew, who thinks he can pack his peashooter into the local courthouse. At least the guy in the post had some balls to test his ideas. Smarter-than-a-yew is too much the pussy.

[SmarterthanYou]

Spectacular advice, Dog.

If a cop tell you to sit down...don't waste time looking for a chair. Just sit down.

Why people argue and get themselves shot is beyond me.

Don't get me wrong...I hate when someone tells me what to do...ESPECIALLY if I know I am in the right.

But if the offending party is a cop...we do what the cop says and argue about it later in front of a judge.

at least you're comfortable with being a slave to the state and submitting peacefully. good job, slave.

[SmarterthanYou]

You are dangerous. Advice like yours gets citizens killed by police.

Take the case of this 17 year old white kid that thought he was a lawyer like youi.


"Guilford had recently become interested in civil liberties, particularly with respect to citizen-police interactions. It also appears that he had read some bad advice. In the video, Guilford tells the officer that he isn’t obligated to provide his driver’s license. (Local columnist Judy Putnam reports that Guilford was driving from his girlfriend’s house to a church basketball game and had simply forgotten his license at her home.) This is incorrect. In most places, a driver is obligated to provide a license and registration (and in some states, proof of insurance) when been pulled over, even if the police officer lacked cause for the underlying stop.


But even if Guilford had been correct about his rights, as lots of other motorists have in similar videos posted online, many would argue that he shouldn’t have argued with the cop at the time. The time to make your case about your rights is afterward, in court. That’s obviously sound advice on one very basic level — had he done that, Guilford would still be alive today."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.d0112ff0a4db

yes, we the people are too fucking stupid to know what our rights are and what they aren't, therefore we must have our overlords tell us what they are in court and hope it works out for the best. kneel before Zod