Originally Posted by
sear
That's splendid.
But the assertion was:
Which then is false.
For your quotation indicates not that our Constitution "specifically forbidding",
but instead merely requires congressional consent.
Ordinarily I wouldn't say so, but you seem to need to be told:
When statements are made under pseud, the credibility of the pseud is enhanced when the claim is true, and undermined when it is not.
The credibility you have undermined here is your own.
well you're completely full of horseshit. what I said was completely correct, that the constitution prohibits the states from keeping their own troops. your caveat of 'congressional consent' provides an exception to the prohibition and that is all. don't be mad that I pointed out something you didn't know. just accept the info I gave you and be appreciative.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Bookmarks