Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 76 to 87 of 87

Thread: If there really was a Deep State conspiracy to stop Trump, why did they do it?

  1. #76 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    wrong again..
    no firewall means NO FIREWALL, and that means ALL her Emails ( server) was vulnerable -
    including the classified info she denied was on there
    and your proof is what?


    I gave proof of everything Ive claimed here

    back your claim

  2. #77 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    and your proof is what?


    that your Russian plant trump is getting caught ?
    McCabe was fired. Strzok/Page texts are self incriminating. FISA abuse means reliance on the unverified steele dossier, with out full disclosure etc.

    Since you haven't been paying attention, you'll have to wait for the IG report due out soon,
    then you can get upto speed

  3. The Following User Groans At dukkha For This Awful Post:

    Nordberg (04-02-2018)

  4. #78 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    and your proof is what?


    I gave proof of everything Ive claimed here

    back your claim
    why Clinton's Private Email Server Was Such a Security Fail
    https://www.wired.com/2015/03/clinto...er-vulnerable/
    For a secretary of state, running your own email server might be a clever—if controversial—way to keep your conversations hidden from journalists and their pesky Freedom of Information Act requests. But ask a few security experts, and the consensus is that it's not a very smart way to keep those conversations hidden from hackers.

    On Monday, the New York Times revealed that former secretary of state and future presidential candidate Hillary Clinton used a private email account rather than her official State.gov email address while serving in the State Department. And this was no Gmail or Yahoo! Mail account: On Wednesday the AP reported that Clinton actually ran a private mail server in her home during her entire tenure leading the State Department, hosting her email at the domain Clintonemail.com.

    Much of the criticism of that in-house email strategy has centered on its violation of the federal government's record-keeping and transparency rules. But as the controversy continues to swirl, the security community is focused on a different issue: the possibility that an unofficial, unprotected server held the communications of America's top foreign affairs official for four years, leaving all of it potentially vulnerable to state-sponsored hackers.

    "Although the American people didn’t know about this, it’s almost certain that foreign intelligence agencies did, just as the NSA knows which Indian and Spanish officials use Gmail and Yahoo accounts," says Chris Soghoian, the lead technologist for the American Civil Liberties Union. "She’s not the first official to use private email and not the last. But there are serious security issue associated with these kinds of services...When you build your house outside the security fence, you’re on your own, and that’s what seems to have happened here."

    The most obvious security issue with Clinton running her own email server, says Soghoian, is the lack of manpower overseeing it compared with the State Department's official email system. The federal agency's own IT security team monitors State Department servers for possible vulnerabilities and breaches, and those computers fall under the NSA's protection, too. Since 2008, for instance, the so-called Einstein project has functioned as an umbrella intrusion-detection system for more than a dozen federal agencies; Though it's run by the Department of Homeland Security, it uses NSA data and vulnerability-detection methods.

    Clinton's email wouldn't have the benefit of any of that expensive government security. If she had hosted her email with Google or even Yahoo! or Microsoft, there might be an argument that those private companies' security teams are just as competent as the those of the feds. But instead, according to the Associated Press, Clinton ran her server

  5. #79 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    McCabe was fired. Strzok/Page texts are self incriminating. FISA abuse means reliance on the unverified steele dossier, with out full disclosure etc.

    Since you haven't been paying attention, you'll have to wait for the IG report due out soon,
    then you can get upto speed
    the steel dossier has now been mosty verified idiot

    its you and trumpy/Putin against the world asshole

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Cypress (04-02-2018)

  7. #80 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    long beach CA
    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 19 Times in 9 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    "You think there isn’t a cabal or so called republicans that don’t want to bring Trump down?"

    Do you mean Pence, Ryan, McConnell, Sessions, Mnuchin, Chao, Carson, Devos, Mulvaney, Pruitt, Haley, Perry, Nunes, Kushner, Hucksterbee, Conway, ?????

    Just who are these Republicans that have joined a "cabal" that you speak so lightly of? Got names? Got Proof? Got facts?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Patricktm For This Post:

    evince (04-02-2018)

  9. #81 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  10. #82 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smb View Post
    I know you are but what am I.
    Pitiful.

  11. #83 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,515
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,563 Times in 17,090 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    It is the illuminatti. helped by the Knights Templar.

  12. #84 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    no you idjit...
    It's the IC LEADERSHIP positions that are corrupt
    OMG, you mean like Wray and Pompeo?

  13. #85 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    https://www.upguard.com/breaches/the-rnc-files


    In what is the largest known data exposure of its kind, UpGuard’s Cyber Risk Team can now confirm that a misconfigured database containing the sensitive personal details of over 198 million American voters was left exposed to the internet by a firm working on behalf of the Republican National Committee (RNC) in their efforts to elect Donald Trump. The data, which was stored in a publicly accessible cloud server owned by Republican data firm Deep Root Analytics, included 1.1 terabytes of entirely unsecured personal information compiled by DRA and at least two other Republican contractors, TargetPoint Consulting, Inc. and Data Trust. In total, the personal information of potentially near all of America’s 200 million registered voters was exposed, including names, dates of birth, home addresses, phone numbers, and voter registration details, as well as data described as “modeled” voter ethnicities and religions.
    Cyber crime is really a big issue now a days. I faced many problem when my company website software was attack by hacker. The best solution to saved your infromation or oganization from such attacks is to get a certificate of ISO 27001. it will really help you and its will identify all your security issues.

  14. #86 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    https://www.upguard.com/breaches/the-rnc-files


    In what is the largest known data exposure of its kind, UpGuard’s Cyber Risk Team can now confirm that a misconfigured database containing the sensitive personal details of over 198 million American voters was left exposed to the internet by a firm working on behalf of the Republican National Committee (RNC) in their efforts to elect Donald Trump. The data, which was stored in a publicly accessible cloud server owned by Republican data firm Deep Root Analytics, included 1.1 terabytes of entirely unsecured personal information compiled by DRA and at least two other Republican contractors, TargetPoint Consulting, Inc. and Data Trust. In total, the personal information of potentially near all of America’s 200 million registered voters was exposed, including names, dates of birth, home addresses, phone numbers, and voter registration details, as well as data described as “modeled” voter ethnicities and religions.


    Tell the Republican Party not me noob

  15. #87 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    Most of the presumed conspirators in the FBI, CIA etc. were Republicans. Why didn't they go along with it like the rest of the GOP? What do you think spooked them?
    Very likely Trump's hate Trump's homophobia and racism have a habit of putting people off don't you know

Similar Threads

  1. The Deep State Is in Deep Cover-up Mode
    By hvilleherb in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-17-2018, 05:57 PM
  2. Trump considering spy network to combat 'deep state' enemies: Intercept
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-05-2017, 04:02 PM
  3. Can Trump And Putin Destroy The Deep State?
    By philly rabbit in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 119
    Last Post: 06-05-2017, 11:13 AM
  4. Kucinich goes after Deep State attacks on Trump
    By Darth Omar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 157
    Last Post: 05-21-2017, 05:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •