When 60 minutes broadcast the Stormy Daniels interview ,

**archives** · 03-19-2018, 10:30 AM

Interesting how the right for so long laid claim to the family values tag, fought hard to perpetuate the "cultural war" theme, and now within a year, are stepping forwarded to defend their party's leader who epitomizes all those Hollywood values they supposedly hated

In comparison, the Obamas look like the Nelson family, that's got to irritate a few of those supposed Christian Evangelists

**kudzu** · 03-19-2018, 10:35 AM

Punishing Stormy Daniels for having sex with Trump doesn't make much sense to me unless Trump is incompetent.

**MAGA MAN** · 03-19-2018, 10:39 AM

Originally Posted by Bourbon

Who said that was ok, Names ... I want Names.

BTW, if Barack Obama did just a Micro-Fraction of what Trump has done, I'm sure you're forgive him also, correct?

You want names? Ever here of Google? https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...nduct-liberals

Steinem, Fuentes, Williams, Brown

**jbander** · 03-19-2018, 10:39 AM

Originally Posted by kudzu

Punishing Stormy Daniels for having sex with Trump doesn't make much sense to me unless Trump is incompetent.

I don't get this, what do you mean.Being sued?

**MAGA MAN** · 03-19-2018, 10:40 AM

Originally Posted by jbander

not histerical but thanks for proving my point, of your hypocrisy. You can justify scum bag but that no good Clinton guy, Hypocrite.

Kindly cite where I have blasted Clinton for a consensual affair.

**kudzu** · 03-19-2018, 10:42 AM

Originally Posted by jbander

I don't get this, what do you mean.Being sued?

Yes. Trump claims he'll sue Stormy for 20 million dollars, but he denied they had an affair.. Comical, isn't it.

I'm not worried for her. During his campaign Trump claimed to have filed suit against more than 200 people.

**Nordberg** · 03-19-2018, 10:47 AM

Originally Posted by aloysious

I went to dinner with a colleague this past week who says he can't stand trump but would probably vote for him today and definitely would if he had the same choices as last election. And he did not vote for him last time. He wrote in the name of a dead ex-senator.
I wonder how many out there feel the same.
No matter how bad you perceive trump to be, you have to admit we didn't have much of a choice between the 2 main parties.

Yeah we did. Hillary was actually qualified for the office in experience and temperament. Trump is floundering and an embarrassment. Although the Repubs would have used their power to stop her from doing anything. We would have several Benghazis and Email investigations going on.No judges would have been passed . Her appointments would have been stonewalled.

**Cancel 2018.1** · 03-19-2018, 10:53 AM

Originally Posted by Nordberg

Yeah we did.

We did, but not from the duopolies.
We could have felt the Johnson.

**jbander** · 03-19-2018, 12:03 PM

Originally Posted by Dark Soul

You want names? Ever here of Google? https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...nduct-liberals

Steinem, Fuentes, Williams, Brown

Thanks, that I found very humorous. Hypocrite
,

**jbander** · 03-19-2018, 12:09 PM

Originally Posted by Dark Soul

Kindly cite where I have blasted Clinton for a consensual affair.

Right here ,here's your quote-I see the hypocritical in your hate party. Sex with an unpaid, age-vulnerable intern (in acts designed for one-way gratification, I may add) was OK with you. But two consenting adults, and with a woman who is a professional sex provider, suddenly you're all hysterical.: If you want to play games tell me where is said anything about blasting Clinton.

**jbander** · 03-19-2018, 12:13 PM

Originally Posted by Dark Soul

You want names? Ever here of Google? https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...nduct-liberals

Steinem, Fuentes, Williams, Brown

By the way can't you read, He says"Who said that was ok, Names ... I want Names. " your funny source has what to do about who said it was OK.

**MAGA MAN** · 03-19-2018, 12:19 PM

Originally Posted by jbander

By the way can't you read, He says"Who said that was ok, Names ... I want Names. " your funny source has what to do about who said it was OK.

Too funny. You accuse me of not knowing how to read by way of terrible sentence structure.

**MAGA MAN** · 03-19-2018, 12:20 PM

Originally Posted by jbander

Right here ,here's your quote-I see the hypocritical in your hate party. Sex with an unpaid, age-vulnerable intern (in acts designed for one-way gratification, I may add) was OK with you. But two consenting adults, and with a woman who is a professional sex provider, suddenly you're all hysterical.: If you want to play games tell me where is said anything about blasting Clinton.

That wasn't a consensual affair. You can't read.

**jbander** · 03-19-2018, 12:26 PM

Originally Posted by Dark Soul

That wasn't a consensual affair. You can't read.

who cares hypocrite, you can't justify what scum bag does by what someone else does,

**MAGA MAN** · 03-19-2018, 12:43 PM

Originally Posted by jbander

who cares hypocrite, you can't justify what scum bag does by what someone else does,

Again, I don't care what two consenting adults do. Now a sitting president, in the Oval Office, with an unpaid intern... That's an entirely different story. You attempt to equate this with a private citizen on his own time with a professional sex provider is a desperate attempt to accuse your political enemies with hypocrisy, and only shows your own hypocrisy.