Florida gun confiscation begins under new law. - LIBERAL FASCISM!!

[Leonthecat]

Time for a shoot out in a cabin in the woods.

[katzgar]

I am very familiar with the story. the government took an accusation to a judge and ok'd an INVOLUNTARY commitment/incarceration and then stole his property. so you're ok with that being the norm in a supposedly free country now?

You may have read the article but you sure as f*** didn't understand it you stupid moron.

[SmarterthanYou]

i love pissing you statist mother fuckers off to no end when you have no real answer to the questions posed to you, other than to sputter 'but but but'....

you lose, fucktards.

[kudzu]

I am very familiar with the story. the government took an accusation to a judge and ok'd an INVOLUNTARY commitment/incarceration and then stole his property. so you're ok with that being the norm in a supposedly free country now?

Lighthouse Point is a pretty affluent area.. and the guy was Baker Acted.. That doesn't happen on a whim.. Have some courage..

[canceled.2021.3]

Says who? Is this yet another one of your delusions you mistaken for fact? Proof beyond your opinion, supposition and conjecture please.

But in this vain, shouldn’t all potential dangerous things be taken from him?

Cars can be used by crazy people to inflict massive carnage.

Why not take the car too?
Limit his ability to buy fertilizer?
Remove all knives?

All temporarily of course so you can have some measure of feeling safe.

Because we all know that YOUR perceived feelings of safety are more important than an individuals rights

This action merely proves what I have said all along about the “mental health” conversation regarding guns. It is nothing more than a left wing backward way of confiscating weapons cloaked as a “reasonable” action

This too will fail because as is always the case with lefties, you will go too far and will receive a backlash

[kudzu]

But in this vain, shouldn’t all potential dangerous things be taken from him?

Cars can be used by crazy people to inflict massive carnage.

Why not take the car too?
Limit his ability to buy fertilizer?
Remove all knives?

All temporarily of course so you can have some measure of feeling safe.

Because we all know that YOUR perceived feelings of safety are more important than an individuals rights

This action merely proves what I have said all along about the “mental health” conversation regarding guns. It is nothing more than a left wing backward way of confiscating weapons cloaked as a “reasonable” action

This too will fail because as is always the case with lefties, you will go too far and will receive a backlash

"Vein" NOT Vain.......

He was Baker Acted.. That is not whimsy.. Have a little courage... or are you afraid to take guns from the mentally ill?

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Or perhaps you like people undergoing involuntary psych treatment to have weapons at the ready? Maybe the last 20 years of mass shootings doesn't register with you either.

.

And yet you libs say let him have all the CARS he wants!!! THINK

[kudzu]

And yet you libs say let him have all the CARS he wants!!! THINK

You can't drive when you are Baker Acted.................

[katzgar]

That's all it takes now. The govt says "you are a risk" and they steal your guns!

This should give you a reason to address your ... inadequacies

[iolo]

America seems a strange place. In most countries it is not regarded as 'fascism' to want to prevent madmen from killing your children.

[zymurgy]

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government. — Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist (#28)

As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms. — Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym "A Pennsylvanian" in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1.

"Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity, and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former, for the sake of the latter. The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fortitude, and perseverance. Let us remember that `if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom.' It is a very serious consideration...that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event." --Samuel Adams, speech in Boston, 1771

States always had this power prior to the 14th Amendment creating the ambiguity that created 5-4 decisions today.

You do realize that, right? All the people you quoted would have zero problem under the constitution from seeing the State exercising this power.

Zealotry is no excuse for retardism

[SmarterthanYou]

States always had this power prior to the 14th Amendment creating the ambiguity that created 5-4 decisions today.

the states have their own constitutions to adhere to, though most of the states showed that they are even more corrupt than the federal government, thus the 14th.

You do realize that, right? All the people you quoted would have zero problem under the constitution from seeing the State exercising this power.

absolutely, and I support leaving it all up to the states. the federal government is SUPPOSED to be LIMITED and RESTRICTED.

Zealotry is no excuse for retardism

and yet the statists on here let it happen

[Text Drivers are Killers]

America seems a strange place. In most countries it is not regarded as 'fascism' to want to prevent madmen from killing your children.

Fascism is when the govt takes away guns. When the guns are gone, everything is gone. THINK - super-fascist america-hater.

[Nordberg]

you have to PROVE that they are crazy and dangerous first. it's how due process works. it's how being INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty works. it's about the rights of the INDIVIDUAL first before the wants of the majority. what is being pushed is totalitarianism and anti freedom.

What would this proof look like? Why it is impossible to prove until they shoot up a school. Well then, forget background checks. Everyone is safe until people die. The guy who shot up the show in Vegas was innocent until he pulled the trigger. Up to that point, there was no proof he was going through with it.

That is logical to you?

[SmarterthanYou]

What would this proof look like? Why it is impossible to prove until they shoot up a school. Well then, forget background checks. Everyone is safe until people die. The guy who shot up the show in Vegas was innocent until he pulled the trigger. Up to that point, there was no proof he was going through with it.

That is logical to you?

it is freedom to me. Everything you are advocating, right now, EVERYTHING!!!!, is the exact opposite of why the founders rebelled and created a new nation of freedom. WHY are you now swallowing the tyrannical government koolaid of safety by approving of the removal/negation of innocent until proven guilty?