Florida gun confiscation begins under new law. - LIBERAL FASCISM!!

[Text Drivers are Killers]

That's all it takes now. The govt says "you are a risk" and they steal your guns!

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/br...316-story.html

march 16 2018 A Broward County judge on Friday issued the state’s first order temporarily removing guns from a person under Florida’s new gun-control laws.

Four firearms and 267 rounds of ammunition were ordered removed from a 56-year-old Lighthouse Point man who was determined to be a potential risk to himself or others.

The guns and ammunition have been temporarily removed from the man under the state’s new “risk protection” law, which is also sometimes called “red flag” legislation, Lighthouse Point City Attorney Michael Cirullo confirmed.

The man was also taken to a hospital for involuntary psychiatric treatment under the state’s Baker Act. But the civil ruling removing his access to guns and ammunition was granted under the new legislation — which permits confiscating guns from people who have not been committed but are deemed a potential risk to themselves or others, according to the order signed by Broward’s Chief Judge Jack Tuter.

[kudzu]

Good... The guy was a danger to himself and others.

[SmarterthanYou]

Good... The guy was a danger to himself and others.

you have proof of that? or you think that government should be able to act on accusations alone, incarcerate an American Citizen, and steal his legally owned property?

[SmarterthanYou]

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government. — Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist (#28)

As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms. — Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym "A Pennsylvanian" in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1.

"Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity, and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former, for the sake of the latter. The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fortitude, and perseverance. Let us remember that `if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom.' It is a very serious consideration...that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event." --Samuel Adams, speech in Boston, 1771

[kudzu]

you have proof of that? or you think that government should be able to act on accusations alone, incarcerate an American Citizen, and steal his legally owned property?

Read the whole article for a change........

[SmarterthanYou]

Read the whole article for a change........

I am very familiar with the story. the government took an accusation to a judge and ok'd an INVOLUNTARY commitment/incarceration and then stole his property. so you're ok with that being the norm in a supposedly free country now?

[Text Drivers are Killers]

When the guns are gone, everything is gone.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Lets do the same thing with car owners then. Someone is acting strange and so the govt can take his car. Do liberals accept that?

[Nordberg]

you have proof of that? or you think that government should be able to act on accusations alone, incarcerate an American Citizen, and steal his legally owned property?

Oh, then let the crazy man have a gun until he shoots people. That makes sense. This is what is being pushed. Crazy and dangerous people should not be allowed guns.

[SmarterthanYou]

Oh, then let the crazy man have a gun until he shoots people. That makes sense. This is what is being pushed. Crazy and dangerous people should not be allowed guns.

you have to PROVE that they are crazy and dangerous first. it's how due process works. it's how being INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty works. it's about the rights of the INDIVIDUAL first before the wants of the majority. what is being pushed is totalitarianism and anti freedom.

[Jade Dragon]

Micro peen is spreading biased manure around again.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Oh, then let the crazy man have a gun until he shoots people. That makes sense. This is what is being pushed. Crazy and dangerous people should not be allowed guns.

And yet you libs think crazy people should be allowed to own and drive cars!!!!

[Taichiliberal]

That's all it takes now. The govt says "you are a risk" and they steal your guns!

Are you really this fucking stupid or what? Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Does the word "temporarily" register in that tiny mind of yours? Or are you some toadstool who gets his jollies just posting misleading and incorrect subject titles just to get a rise out of people?

Or perhaps you like people undergoing involuntary psych treatment to have weapons at the ready? Maybe the last 20 years of mass shootings doesn't register with you either.

THINK BEFORE YOUR FINGERS HIT THE KEYS, TOODLES.

[Taichiliberal]

And yet you libs think crazy people should be allowed to own and drive cars!!!!

Says who? Is this yet another one of your delusions you mistaken for fact? Proof beyond your opinion, supposition and conjecture please.

[Taichiliberal]

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government. — Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist (#28)

As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms. — Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym "A Pennsylvanian" in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1.

"Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity, and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former, for the sake of the latter. The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fortitude, and perseverance. Let us remember that `if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom.' It is a very serious consideration...that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event." --Samuel Adams, speech in Boston, 1771

Are you really this fucking stupid or what? Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Does the word "temporarily" register in that tiny mind of yours? Or are you some toadstool who gets his jollies just posting misleading and incorrect subject titles just to get a rise out of people?

Or perhaps you like people undergoing involuntary psych treatment to have weapons at the ready? Maybe the last 20 years of mass shootings doesn't register with you either.

THINK BEFORE YOUR FINGERS HIT THE KEYS, TOODLES.