So, how do you think the school walkout helped? No ban list, accept for Annie

[itsKingD]

If an item that is currently legal to buy and possess becomes no longer available because of a NEW LAW, you don't consider that a penalty for those who have committed no illegal act?

So by that logic, I guess you also think the requirement of wearing a seat belt in a car is considered a penalty for drivers right?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

[USFREEDOM911]

So by that logic, I guess you also think the requirement of wearing a seat belt in a car is considered a penalty for drivers right?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

Maybe you could explain yourself and show the connection you're trying to make; because, are seat belts denied to anyone?

[itsKingD]

Maybe you could explain yourself and show the connection you're trying to make; because, are seat belts denied to anyone?

OK. Example

The Samsung.. I think 8? The one that was blowing up?
Ok. So many people still have that phone, and it hasn't denoted, yet Samsung discontinued making them because they posed a dangerous hazard.

No ones coming for the phones still in possession by those individuals, however you can't get them anymore because they pose a risk.
Now, is that a penalty or protection?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

[sear]

"are seat belts denied to anyone?" U9 #348

They are not standard in the 1948 Plymouth Special Deluxe, a very comfortable car.

[RB 60]

OK.. Example.

I'm not sure what case it was, but it involved the killing of an unarmed black man in which the poliece officer involved was indicted on charges of murder.

In a jury of his peers, most were white, all but one white man, accused the officer of being guilty.

Because there was no unanimous decision, obviously he was acquitted.

When word got out, that man was not only perceived by the people, but also by multiple news outlets just as racist and wrong as the officer who actually commited the act. So much so, they had to protect his identity due to death threats.

He claimed he truly didn't feel the officer was guilty and didn't want to sentence him to jail, however;* That didn't stop the general public from lumping them together in the same group.

It's kinda like when those whites we're defending the existence of the Robert E.* Lee statue. They claimed they we're protecting history,* but from my point, and many others, those people are no different and just as "guilty" as the KKK.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

For the fourth and final time. As a gun owner, what responsibility do I share with the assholes who commit gun crimes?
Answer the damn question.

PS: Don't even bring race into this, it is irrelevant to you accusing me of being responsible for others.
As for your other deflection, neither of us were on those juries, were we?

[itsKingD]

For the fourth and final time. As a gun owner, what responsibility do I share with the assholes who commit gun crimes?
Answer the damn question.

PS: Don't even bring race into this, it is irrelevant to you accusing me of being responsible for others.
As for your other deflection, neither of us were on those juries, were we?

Is something wrong with your brain that can't comprehend the concept of perception?
Or are you just choosing to ignore?



Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

[itsKingD]

For the fourth and final time. As a gun owner, what responsibility do I share with the assholes who commit gun crimes?
Answer the damn question.

PS: Don't even bring race into this, it is irrelevant to you accusing me of being responsible for others.
As for your other deflection, neither of us were on those juries, were we?

....what does neither of us being on the jury trial have ANYTHING AT ALL to do with what I said???

Your over analyzing the situation and is still missing the basic point.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

[RB 60]

Is something wrong with your brain that can't comprehend the concept of perception?
Or are you just choosing to ignore?



Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

My perception is adept. Answer the question. I don't think you can, logically anyway.

[itsKingD]

My perception is adept. Answer the question. I don't think you can, logically anyway.

How else am I supposed to answer a question I have already answered multiple times?

I'd like to encourage you to take a couple of classes in humanities and vocabulary. Maybe then you'll understand.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

[itsKingD]

My perception is adept. Answer the question. I don't think you can, logically anyway.

And your Perception is adept?? What does that even mean?



Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

[USFREEDOM911]

OK. Example

The Samsung.. I think 8? The one that was blowing up?
Ok. So many people still have that phone, and it hasn't denoted, yet Samsung discontinued making them because they posed a dangerous hazard.

No ones coming for the phones still in possession by those individuals, however you can't get them anymore because they pose a risk.
Now, is that a penalty or protection?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

Did the Government pass a law that denied anyone the ability to buy one?

[itsKingD]

Did the Government pass a law that denied anyone the ability to buy one?

For God sakes.

It's about people collectively coming together, identifying a problem and then administrating a solution, that didn't effect owners already in possession of the product.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

[USFREEDOM911]

For God sakes.

It's about people collectively coming together, identifying a problem and then administrating a solution, that didn't effect owners already in possession of the product.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

People can individual or collectively do as they wish, the Government is another matter.

[itsKingD]

People can individual or collectively do as they wish, the Government is another matter.

You do realize our government is ran by people/individuals and not robots right?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk

[domer76]

For the fourth and final time. As a gun owner, what responsibility do I share with the assholes who commit gun crimes?
Answer the damn question.

PS: Don't even bring race into this, it is irrelevant to you accusing me of being responsible for others.
As for your other deflection, neither of us were on those juries, were we?

You vote for the cocksuckers who favor fewer restrictions on guns. That’s where you bear responsibility.