Truth Detector (03-16-2018)
Truth Detector (03-16-2018)
Truth Detector (03-16-2018)
Truth Detector (03-16-2018)
yes.
as upheld by the v. miller decision.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174
The court held that the 2nd protects the arms common to the military at the time.
the AR-15 is THE most common such arm.
Truth Detector (03-16-2018)
Truth Detector (03-16-2018)
Truth Detector (03-16-2018)
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
meds, you need them adjusted my friend.
No, the prevailing position of the left wing of this government, and the media, et al is guns bad, despite statistics and reality, these kids with approval of the school are pretending to stand up when all they are doing is parroting the governments desires.
Truth Detector (03-16-2018)
Here is just one example:
ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Maryland's ban on 45 kinds of assault weapons and its 10-round limit on gun magazines were upheld Tuesday by a federal appeals court in a decision that met with a strongly worded dissent.
In a 10-4 ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, said the guns banned under Maryland's law aren't protected by the Second Amendment.
"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote for the court, adding that the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly excluded such coverage.
Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh, who led the push for the law in 2013 as a state senator, said it's "unthinkable that these weapons of war, weapons that caused the carnage in Newtown and in other communities across the country, would be protected by the Second Amendment."
Bookmarks