Members banned from this thread: Minister of Truth, cawacko, evince and ZappasGuitar


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Yet another mass shooting. When will we ban guns?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default Yet another mass shooting. When will we ban guns?

    http://fox17online.com/2018/02/18/gu...ussian-church/


    Oh wait, Russia already has a gun ban in place. Seems crazy. Liberals tell us that if we ban guns we will not have mass shootings in churches and schools or anywhere else.

    Odd huh?

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,506
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked 9,834 Times in 6,110 Posts
    Groans
    422
    Groaned 710 Times in 658 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    We don't want to ban guns, we want to make restrictions on weapons of war. Keep the guns, just expect some regulation to fall down on your so called militias, keeping the government, and their Apache helicopters, long range similes, and tanks in line. You could tell me it keeps the reptilian overlords in check, for about as believable an idea.

    My brother has guns, my neighbor friends have them. This isn't about guns, it's about weapons of war not belonging in civilian hands, let alone the mentally deranged.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade Dragon View Post
    We don't want to ban guns, we want to make restrictions on weapons of war. Keep the guns, just expect some regulation to fall down on your so called militias, keeping the government, and their Apache helicopters, long range similes, and tanks in line. You could tell me it keeps the reptilian overlords in check, for about as believable an idea.

    My brother has guns, my neighbor friends have them. This isn't about guns, it's about weapons of war not belonging in civilian hands, let alone the mentally deranged.
    On February 19, the Los Angeles Times claimed that there would be no mass shooters if a “mass-shooting gun” like the AR-15 was banned.

    What makes the AR-15 sold to people at the average gun store a weapon of war?

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade Dragon View Post
    We don't want to ban guns, we want to make restrictions on weapons of war. Keep the guns, just expect some regulation to fall down on your so called militias, keeping the government, and their Apache helicopters, long range similes, and tanks in line. You could tell me it keeps the reptilian overlords in check, for about as believable an idea.

    My brother has guns, my neighbor friends have them. This isn't about guns, it's about weapons of war not belonging in civilian hands, let alone the mentally deranged.
    this is why you betray your real beliefs when you use language like "weapons of war".

    A 9mm handgun is a "Weapon of war"

    A .45 ACP is a "weapon of war"

    The minute you start trying to use your scary language trying to guilt us into some compromise, you betray your position and lose the argument. Because you never ever ever ever try to come up with common sense safety measures. You always revert to the gun no matter what data is presented to you.

    So you will have to lose yet again

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    this is why you betray your real beliefs when you use language like "weapons of war".

    A 9mm handgun is a "Weapon of war"

    A .45 ACP is a "weapon of war"

    The minute you start trying to use your scary language trying to guilt us into some compromise, you betray your position and lose the argument. Because you never ever ever ever try to come up with common sense safety measures. You always revert to the gun no matter what data is presented to you.

    So you will have to lose yet again
    He doesn't like the gun that he referenced because they look scary.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    On February 19, the Los Angeles Times claimed that there would be no mass shooters if a “mass-shooting gun” like the AR-15 was banned.

    What makes the AR-15 sold to people at the average gun store a weapon of war?
    .

    Because its sole purpose is to kill as many targets as it can in the shortest amount of time, although, I have seen a conservative post that it is his weapon of choice in hunting squirrels.

    Who in the hell hunts squirrels? Who would want to hunt squirrels?

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    The Russian Bots are putting themselves into a difficult spot. They are having to defend a battlefield on American soil by mentally ill people against students.

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    this is why you betray your real beliefs when you use language like "weapons of war".

    A 9mm handgun is a "Weapon of war"

    A .45 ACP is a "weapon of war"

    The minute you start trying to use your scary language trying to guilt us into some compromise, you betray your position and lose the argument. Because you never ever ever ever try to come up with common sense safety measures. You always revert to the gun no matter what data is presented to you.

    So you will have to lose yet again
    Then up I tell us, what other purpose does those weapons have? What's the point of owning any of them?

    And don't say defense, or regurgitate the freedom crap, real answers

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    .

    Because its sole purpose is to kill as many targets as it can in the shortest amount of time, although, I have seen a conservative post that it is his weapon of choice in hunting squirrels.

    Who in the hell hunts squirrels? Who would want to hunt squirrels?
    1) they are varmints
    2) they are good eating, just have to shoot a lot of them to make a difference

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    28,688
    Thanks
    26,423
    Thanked 14,245 Times in 9,790 Posts
    Groans
    563
    Groaned 606 Times in 573 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    http://fox17online.com/2018/02/18/gu...ussian-church/


    Oh wait, Russia already has a gun ban in place. Seems crazy. Liberals tell us that if we ban guns we will not have mass shootings in churches and schools or anywhere else.

    Odd huh?
    IIRC, Ruskies can own a rifle with a 10 round magazine.
    "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
    — Joe Biden on Obama.

    Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.

    D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.

    Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Then up I tell us, what other purpose does those weapons have? What's the point of owning any of them?

    And don't say defense, or regurgitate the freedom crap, real answers
    I don't have to defend owning them to you. That is the beauty of it. What is the point of owning an iPhone? What is the point of driving a Mercedes? What is the point of owning a 3000 sq foot house?

    As I said, you always betray yourselves as the gun grabbers you are. You will lose.

    Please by all means, gin up gun voters right before the mid terms. That will work out swimmingly in 2018

    If you think these mushy teenagers will be ginned up by then you are fooling yourself. But, I dare ya to try

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    .

    Because its sole purpose is to kill as many targets as it can in the shortest amount of time, although, I have seen a conservative post that it is his weapon of choice in hunting squirrels.

    Who in the hell hunts squirrels? Who would want to hunt squirrels?
    That doesn't make it a weapon of war. For it to be a weapon of war it would have to be used in a war. It's a gun you don't like, therefore, you make every excuse you can to push your bullshit lies.

    Lots of people hunt squirrels. Your statement is just another example of the typical leftwinger thinking something is silly because he doesn't do it.

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Then up I tell us, what other purpose does those weapons have? What's the point of owning any of them?

    And don't say defense, or regurgitate the freedom crap, real answers
    I enjoy shooting the FOUR I own. You don't have to understand that just recognize that because you don't doesn't mean other don't or shouldn't enjoy shooting it.

    Once again, unless someone gives an answer you agree with or like you deem it not a real answer. Typical leftwing loser. In the end, I still have my FOUR and there isn't a damn things I've you willing to do to take them from me.

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I don't have to defend owning them to you. That is the beauty of it. What is the point of owning an iPhone? What is the point of driving a Mercedes? What is the point of owning a 3000 sq foot house?

    As I said, you always betray yourselves as the gun grabbers you are. You will lose.

    Please by all means, gin up gun voters right before the mid terms. That will work out swimmingly in 2018

    If you think these mushy teenagers will be ginned up by then you are fooling yourself. But, I dare ya to try
    He's one of those that has the attitude of 'I don't like it so no one else should'.

    It's idiots like him that have helped me make a lot of money the last two gun shows in my area.

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    From 1982 to 2011,
    66% of weapons used in mass shootings were handguns.
    Just 14% were "assault weapons."
    Mother Jones 7/20/12
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 11-07-2017, 09:20 AM
  2. So where do you think the next mass shooting in America will be?
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 124
    Last Post: 10-06-2017, 06:36 PM
  3. A mass shooting you probably won't hear about
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-01-2016, 02:24 PM
  4. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-24-2015, 06:20 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •