BUMP STOCKS

[ThatOwlWoman]

Obviously, I didn’t for you.
You see, the RW barrel-strokers just shit themselves when “clip” is used for “magazine” or when the term “assault rifle” is mentioned. I was merely mocking those morons with the verbiage of their own idiot-in-chief.

Look out, diarrhea inbound.........

[moon]

And you're a lying coward.

So you didn't like that post, eh ? OK- here it is again;

Trump is a student of duplicity. He specialises in the tossing of imaginary bones to the dogs of the demos.

[countryboy]

Oh yeah, ban bump stocks. Problem solved.

[Darth Omar]

Look out, diarrhea inbound.........

The word ‘assault’ is a verb.

Regardless of who uses it. You can put the word ‘assault’ in front of ‘shovel’ to make ’assault shovel’. See how easy that is?

You can put different kinds of handles on them so they look different than other shovels; then put them on magazine covers to market them as ‘assault shovels’ and make some money.

But when it’s all said and done, it’s just a shovel—until you assault someone with it.

[SmarterthanYou]

https://www.ammoland.com/2018/08/las...#axzz5OLoQQNiH

Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/08/las...#ixzz5OLqOrQKm
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

ATF was “not allowed to physically examine the interior of the weapons” recovered from the Las Vegas shooter’s hotel room, a new Freedom of Information Act production by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives reveals. The baffling revelation appears on page 335 of a response sent to attorney Stephen Stamboulieh as part of an ongoing production of documents responding to his FOIA request.

This leads to another problem for those intending to challenge any finalized rule ATF issues on banning “bump stock”-type devices.

“ATF did not disclose that they had not examined the firearms prior to promulgating the rule,” firearms designed and Historic Arms, LLC President Len Savage notes. “And now that the comment period is closed should they go forward with this rule under the Administrative Procedure Act that information can not be used in a court challenge because it was not submitted prior to closing of comments.

“DOJ is manipulating the APA to make sure that information will NOT be used to shoot down the rule,” Savage concludes. “Does ATF prosecute its firearms cases like it promulgates rules, without ever looking at the evidence? ATF is currently attempting to criminalize an industry and a large swath of the population and NEVER looked at any evidence? They claim they were ‘not allowed'? By whom?”

https://www.dropbox.com/s/jsgx1g5dyk...ction.pdf?dl=0