Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 90

Thread: ANOTHER INDICTMENT

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    This is all you got? Beyond pathetic.
    yet another process crime

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,374
    Thanks
    12,186
    Thanked 14,287 Times in 10,486 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,908 Times in 4,224 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Son-in-law of a Russian oligarch.

    Tick tock

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,276
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,967 Times in 32,282 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    and deleted emails requested by the special counsel's office
    we all know that's not a crime.....

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,276
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,967 Times in 32,282 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    ... and LYING about it sure gets you in trouble.
    at the very least it can keep you from getting elected president......

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Darth Omar (02-20-2018), dukkha (02-20-2018)

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,276
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,967 Times in 32,282 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    IT's breathing for Trump ...

    I bet he could Face Fuck a Righy's Wife in the middle of 5th avenue and they'd still support him.
    I was content when he fucked over Hillary.....

  7. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,104
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 806 Times in 671 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 326 Times in 306 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    From The Hill:

    Special counsel Robert Mueller is charging a man who communicated with former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates with making false statements to federal officials.

    Alex Van Der Zwaan is charged with making "materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements and representations" to the special counsel's office and FBI agents.

    Van Der Zwaan allegedly lied about his last communications with Gates and deleted emails requested by the special counsel's office, according to the indictment.

    The new charges come as Gates is reportedly nearing a plea deal with Mueller, and will testify against former Trump campaign head Paul Manafort.


    http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...h-making-false



    What a tangled web we weave....
    Uh oh he deleted emails under subpoena when will he indict Clinton? Mueller has zero credibility his big finisher is Russian troll farms, Mueller is as corrupt as the day is long and he needs to be put under investigation himself for his involvement with allowing the Uranium One deal to go forward.

  8. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Wow, deleting emails while under investigation is a crime after all.

    Who knew?
    Unless your name is Clinton, of course.

    Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Maybe he and Kenneth Starr can sit down together and have their ham sandwiches for lunch someday.
    Maybe he was right after all? Doubt if Billy Bob could have survived in the febrile environment of today.

    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/11/1...was-right.html

    Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

  10. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    It is?
    It certainly is if those emails were under subpoena.....right Jughead ?
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  11. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    26,766
    Thanks
    9,619
    Thanked 12,000 Times in 8,027 Posts
    Groans
    2,335
    Groaned 1,672 Times in 1,550 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PraiseKek View Post
    Uh oh he deleted emails under subpoena when will he indict Clinton? Mueller has zero credibility his big finisher is Russian troll farms, Mueller is as corrupt as the day is long and he needs to be put under investigation himself for his involvement with allowing the Uranium One deal to go forward.
    You need to be put under "investigation"....

    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  12. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,362
    Thanks
    72,407
    Thanked 35,728 Times in 27,215 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,585 Times in 18,174 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Unless your name is Clinton, of course.

    Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
    the lost emails were her private ones


    you never had any right to see them asshole

  13. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Unless your name is Clinton, of course.

    Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

    Don't be a hater because Clinton's are Smarter than Trump's
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  14. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NOVA View Post
    It certainly is if those emails were under subpoena.....right Jughead ?

    Well Jarod....???? are you still reading up on your law textbooks for an answer ? or are you gonna go with politfact or snoops ?
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  15. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,088
    Thanks
    9,829
    Thanked 33,870 Times in 21,642 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,675 Times in 5,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NOVA View Post

    Well Jarod....???? are you still reading up on your law textbooks for an answer ? or are you gonna go with politfact or snoops ?
    The guy got indicted for lying, not erasing emails.

  16. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,088
    Thanks
    9,829
    Thanked 33,870 Times in 21,642 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,675 Times in 5,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NOVA View Post
    It certainly is if those emails were under subpoena.....right Jughead ?
    This is true. But erasing emails in general is not.

Similar Threads

  1. Nothing burger indictment!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 09-20-2017, 10:30 AM
  2. no indictment for man who killed cop
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-06-2014, 01:14 PM
  3. A stinging indictment
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-25-2012, 06:56 PM
  4. A ringing indictment
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-25-2012, 06:54 PM
  5. yet another Abramoff indictment
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-08-2008, 05:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •