Tick Tock
Tick Tock
ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch
FUCK THE POLICE (02-20-2018), ThatOwlWoman (02-20-2018)
Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!
THE BIG LIE - Blacks and whites are different physically but identical mentally!
There is no way 81 million americans voted for a man they know is a child molester w dementia. Impeach Joe the Pedophile Vegetable (JPV)
No they overthrew the PA and Federal Constitution, gerrymandering is not unconstitutional, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, the Constitution is clear, the right to draw districts is exclusively reserved for the Legislative branch of government.
Article 1 Section 4 - Elections, Meetings. The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Place of Chusing Senators.
There's gonna be hell to pay come 2018.
"Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34
When legislatures have refused to draw constitutional districts in the past, courts have taken it upon themselves to redraw the lounges. This is hardly without precedent.
"Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUK YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT....YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND DICK " THE SUPREME COURT DREW THE LINES ACCORDING TO THE WAY THEY SHOULD BE BEFORE THE FUK HEAD REBOOBCONS ILLEGALLY DID THEM..ONLY A$$ HOLES WOULD AGREE WITH YOU...I CHOSE THE SUPREME COURT FOOL.
Partisan symmetry is imo the ideal. It's the best we can do besides proportional representation. It should be balanced with compactness of course, this map does a good job of that.
"Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34
The DNC controlled PA Supreme Court has no authority to draw any lines anywhere, that power is reserved exclusivelyto the legislative branch, partisan gerrymandering is perfectly legal ans constitutional.
Show me under what Constitutional authority the PA Supreme Court has to for redistricting, this will be the only response you receive from me from here on out until you provide the exact text from either the PA or Federal Constitution which granted them said authority..ONLY A$$ HOLES WOULD AGREE WITH YOU...I CHOSE THE SUPREME COURT FOOL.
I wonder if Cash was aware that the PA Supreme Court found the same districts were constitutional in 2012......when did they become "illegal"?......Quote Originally Posted by cash View Post
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUK YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT....YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND DICK " THE SUPREME COURT DREW THE LINES ACCORDING TO THE WAY THEY SHOULD BE BEFORE THE FUK HEAD REBOOBCONS ILLEGALLY DID THEM.
I don't have to post a law, it's the judicial right, job and it's constitutional to resolve issues when these issues step over the line to being illegal and in this case invalidating one parties vote through gerrymandering is illegal because it guarantees the vote for one party forever, our system would fall apart if the people knew
their vote would never count, the vote must be impartial and when it isn't the courts, which is the proper part of government will take it up make the decision, then the legislature will make a law conforming to the courts decision
There was no law that the courts come down with a ruling in the bush gore election when bush was made president but it did.... you may be to young to know anything about that
OK do you believe one party can use gerrymandering so the other party can never be elected again forever? If so you'd be better off living in a country that believes that kind of government, russia would be a fit.
Bookmarks