Why does the left reject Mueller’s conclusion?

[PostmodernProphet]

It may...but I think not. If I were to bet...I would bet on it finishing sometime in the middle of this year.

I can agree......Mueller will tired of the charade by then......

[PostmodernProphet]

Probably has something to do with a lack of intelligence on the part of the "we."

oh lord, you know it......you can see lack of intelligence in every lib'rul here......

[Frank Apisa]

The Russians are playing you goof balls like a fiddle.

The Russians.

One does not see projection on that scale very often.

You probably have a creche in the corner of your room. Go kneel to your dear leader. You'll feel better.

[Frank Apisa]

Why does Frank keep saying Hillary's emails were sent from her unsecured server to someone with a secured server?

The words were "secure server."

And there are many who feel HER server was a hell of a lot more secure than some government servers.

It was obtained via free enterprise. Doesn't your side contend that "free enterprise" is more trustworthy than government?

[Frank Apisa]

perhaps something about collusion........yes, I definitely think an investigation with nothing about collusion is over......

Could be.

But the point is that the investigation is NOT over.

One cannot reasonable say there is NO evidence of collusion...nor can one reasonably say there is NO evidence that there was no collusion.

The collusion question, PP...is still moot.

Get it?

[Frank Apisa]

oh lord, you know it......you can see lack of intelligence in every lib'rul here......

You may think you do...but that may have more to do with your level...than with the level of the liberals.

I'm not a liberal...so I have no dog in this fight.

[Stretch]

The words were "secure server."

And there are many who feel HER server was a hell of a lot more secure than some government servers.

It was obtained via free enterprise. Doesn't your side contend that "free enterprise" is more trustworthy than government?

It was less secure than AOL......is what they said. LOL

[Stretch]

https://nypost.com/2016/05/05/hillar...ely-unsecured/

http://fortune.com/2015/03/11/hillar...mail-unsecure/

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...score-n2126822


https://www.investors.com/politics/e...ecured-server/

[dukkha]

You are right. What makes my statement correct...is that it is correct.

Stick with dear leader, Noise.
Others have done the same sort of thing...and caused huge damage to our planet.

uh huh..isn't this where you play the Hitler card?

You are completely out in left field alone regarding Hillarys server. for a while she even had no firewall.
Her server was likely hacked. here's the New York Times:

Hillary Clinton’s Email Was Probably Hacked, Experts Say
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/u...perts-say.html
Comey described, in fairly blistering terms, a set of email practices that left Mrs. Clinton’s systems wide open to Russian and Chinese hackers, and an array of others. She had no full-time cybersecurity professional monitoring her system. She took her BlackBerry everywhere she went, “sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries.” Her use of “a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent.”

In the end, the risks created by Mrs. Clinton’s insistence on keeping her communications on a private server may prove to be a larger issue than the relatively small amount of classified data investigators said they found on her system. But the central mystery — who got into the system, if anyone — may never be resolved.

“Reading between the lines and following Comey’s logic, it does sound as if the F.B.I. believes a compromise of Clinton’s email is more likely than not,” said Adam Segal, the author of “Hacked World Order,” who studies cyberissues at the Council on Foreign Relations. “Sophisticated attackers would have known of the existence of the account, would have targeted it and would not have been seen.”

[Darth Omar]

One does not see projection on that scale very often.

You probably have a creche in the corner of your room. Go kneel to your dear leader. You'll feel better.

What does Vlad have you outraged over today lol?

[PraiseKek]

There have been no clear conclusions concerning the Russian interference into the US electoral systems in 2016 made by anyone yet. What has been made clear is that the Russians DID interfere and THEY DID HAVE COLLABORATION AND COOPERATION with certain Americans as they did it. The investigations continue,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Those Americans were the Clinton campaign and Fusion GPS.

[PostmodernProphet]

Could be.

But the point is that the investigation is NOT over.

One cannot reasonable say there is NO evidence of collusion...nor can one reasonably say there is NO evidence that there was no collusion.

The collusion question, PP...is still moot.

Get it?

in law, a moot point is one that no longer merits consideration......

[Stretch]

Could be.

But the point is that the investigation is NOT over.

One cannot reasonable say there is NO evidence of collusion...nor can one reasonably say there is NO evidence that there was no collusion.

The collusion question, PP...is still moot.

Get it?

Where'd you get your law degree? Lawyers-R-Us?

[Cancel 2018.1]

Could be.

But the point is that the investigation is NOT over.

One cannot reasonable say there is NO evidence of collusion...nor can one reasonably say there is NO evidence that there was no collusion.

The collusion question, PP...is still moot.

Get it?

Where'd you get your law degree? Lawyers-R-Us?

Lawyerspeak. He actually could've graduated from Yale.
"It depends on what your definition of is is." - Bill Clinton
So glad I do something useful and constructive in my life.

[Frank Apisa]

It was less secure than AOL......is what they said. LOL

The same "they" say that Donald Trump is doing a decent job as president.

Only fools trust "they."