Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 100

Thread: Why does the left reject Mueller’s conclusion?

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    the rules are that the employee is the one to separate the private from the work emails


    THAT IS THE RULES
    DA RULES are classified info - marked or unmarked -needs to be sent over State.gov accounts.
    She was Sec of State and signed off on her knowledge of classification procedures -and then she ignored them

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    23,320
    Thanks
    13,660
    Thanked 12,238 Times in 7,656 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,055 Times in 1,002 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    dude. I am using his language.
    You can infer what you want but his language is clear he wanted them found ( because they were deleted by Clinton)
    Yes...HIS language was, indeed, clear.

    “Russia, if you're listening, I hope you’ll be able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you’ll probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

    Seems to me he was CLEARLY suggesting that RUSSIA look for them. He was asking them for help.


    So like I said...we agree. We both agree that his language was clear. We both agree there is no need for inferences.

  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Yes...HIS language was, indeed, clear.

    “Russia, if you're listening, I hope you’ll be able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you’ll probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

    Seems to me he was CLEARLY suggesting that RUSSIA look for them. He was asking them for help.


    So like I said...we agree. We both agree that his language was clear. We both agree there is no need for inferences.
    ok fine..so what is the problem?
    The problem is she deleted them while under subpoena -and sent classified info thru her server.
    Clinton -not Trump- put them at risk.

  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    5,166
    Thanks
    1,138
    Thanked 2,495 Times in 1,799 Posts
    Groans
    7
    Groaned 171 Times in 164 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Good grief, PP...are you actually saying you think there is a total lack of evidence that the investigation is incomplete?

    I think there is lots of evidence it is not complete.
    And the evidence is that Trump is president. The investigation will be completed once an establishment candidate is elected.

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Are there any facts that would dissuade you from the Collusion conspiracy theory?

    I have never subscribed to what you call a "conspiracy theory". I don't know whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian agents, and if there was, whether Trump himself was in on it. It's possible - his character and record certainly would not rule it out - so it needs to be investigated.

    What would persuade me that there was very likely no collusion would be if Mueller completed his investigation and announced he had found no evidence of it. That hasn't happened yet.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Tranquillus in Exile For This Post:

    Gotcha68 (02-18-2018)

  7. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    23,320
    Thanks
    13,660
    Thanked 12,238 Times in 7,656 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,055 Times in 1,002 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    ok fine..so what is the problem?
    The problem is she deleted them while under subpoena -and sent classified info thru her server.
    Clinton -not Trump- put them at risk.

    Two things:

    One...this is Trump himself asking Russia for help in his contest with Hillary Clinton.

    Two...HOW IN THE NAME OF JESUS H. CHRIST CAN ANY AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE POSSIBLY STILL BE BOTHERED BY HILLARY CLINTON SENDING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO SOMEONE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE THEM ON A SECURE SERVER...WHEN THE JERKOFF IN CHIEF ALLOWS PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO VIEW CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS...PEOPLE SUSCEPTIBLE TO BLACKMAIL...TO READ THEM EVERY DAY IN THE FUCKING OVAL OFFICE?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Apisa For This Post:

    christiefan915 (02-18-2018)

  9. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Two things:

    One...this is Trump himself asking Russia for help in his contest with Hillary Clinton.

    Two...HOW IN THE NAME OF JESUS H. CHRIST CAN ANY AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE POSSIBLY STILL BE BOTHERED BY HILLARY CLINTON SENDING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO SOMEONE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE THEM ON A SECURE SERVER...WHEN THE JERKOFF IN CHIEF ALLOWS PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO VIEW CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS...PEOPLE SUSCEPTIBLE TO BLACKMAIL...TO READ THEM EVERY DAY IN THE FUCKING OVAL OFFICE?
    Try again.

    Last Updated Jan 29, 2016 9:46 PM EST
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/22-top-...t-be-released/

    The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained some of the U.S. government's most closely guarded secrets, censoring 22 emails with material demanding one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  10. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,613
    Thanks
    65,410
    Thanked 38,182 Times in 25,717 Posts
    Groans
    5,817
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Two things:

    One...this is Trump himself asking Russia for help in his contest with Hillary Clinton.

    Two...HOW IN THE NAME OF JESUS H. CHRIST CAN ANY AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE POSSIBLY STILL BE BOTHERED BY HILLARY CLINTON SENDING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO SOMEONE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE THEM ON A SECURE SERVER...WHEN THE JERKOFF IN CHIEF ALLOWS PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO VIEW CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS...PEOPLE SUSCEPTIBLE TO BLACKMAIL...TO READ THEM EVERY DAY IN THE FUCKING OVAL OFFICE?
    Tell us how you really feel!

    (P.S. I feel the same.)


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  11. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Two things:

    One...this is Trump himself asking Russia for help in his contest with Hillary Clinton.

    Two...HOW IN THE NAME OF JESUS H. CHRIST CAN ANY AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE POSSIBLY STILL BE BOTHERED BY HILLARY CLINTON SENDING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO SOMEONE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE THEM ON A SECURE SERVER...WHEN THE JERKOFF IN CHIEF ALLOWS PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO VIEW CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS...PEOPLE SUSCEPTIBLE TO BLACKMAIL...TO READ THEM EVERY DAY IN THE FUCKING OVAL OFFICE?
    One—Trump was clearly mocking Hillary and her self-inflicted email dilemma.

    Two—Trump is president and gets to decide who sees what lol.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  12. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,278
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,967 Times in 32,282 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Good grief, PP...are you actually saying you think there is a total lack of evidence?
    without a moment's hesitation.....wake me if you find something......

  13. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,278
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,967 Times in 32,282 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Ummm...please read the quote I offered above.

    You will see he actually encouraged them to "find" them...and even indicated they would probably be "rewarded" (albeit) by the press who he said was out to damage him and help Hillary.

    If you really need the video...I've got it.
    and what conclusion did you draw from that?......I know most of the country got a good laugh out of it at Hilliary's expense.....

  14. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,278
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,967 Times in 32,282 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    In any case, there IS lots of evidence...that the investigation is not complete.
    is it your belief that because they have not yet found evidence the investigation is not complete?......if so the investigation may continue through our lifetime.......

  15. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,278
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,967 Times in 32,282 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    I understand that the deluded sycophants want to think each of his moronic posts...are merely jokes.

    I doubt they are.

    HE...is the joke.

    Too bad you cannot see that.
    if he's the joke, why are we laughing at you?....

  16. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,278
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,967 Times in 32,282 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post

    Seems to me he was CLEARLY suggesting that RUSSIA look for them.
    I know.....hilarious!.....

  17. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    I know most of the country got a good laugh out of it at Hilliary's expense.....

    Another rib-tickler from Trump ...

    Obama was the founder of ISIS

    August 12, 2016
    Donald Trump said Thursday that he meant exactly what he said when he called President Barack Obama the "founder of ISIS" and objected when a conservative radio show host tried to clarify the GOP nominee's position.

    Trump was asked by host Hugh Hewitt about the comments Trump made Wednesday night in Florida. Hewitt said he understood Trump to mean that Obama created the vacuum, he lost the peace.

    Trump objected. "No, I meant he's the founder of ISIS," Trump said. "I do. He was the most valuable player. I give him the most valuable player award. I give her, too, by the way, Hillary Clinton."

    https://edition.cnn.com/2016/08/11/p...sis/index.html

    It's the way he tells 'em!

Similar Threads

  1. Bundy in Oregon; the inevitable conclusion
    By Taichiliberal in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-27-2016, 05:28 PM
  2. Voters reject left wingers jackbooted tactics
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-13-2015, 03:46 AM
  3. Personal Information War, Conclusion
    By Damocles in forum Announcements
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 08-22-2011, 01:52 PM
  4. Has the South Won the Civil War Nearly 150 Years After Its Conclusion?
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-24-2011, 09:59 PM
  5. My conclusion of our differences of opinion
    By theMAJORITY in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12-30-2007, 03:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •