Why does the left reject Mueller’s conclusion?

[dukkha]

Two things:

One...this is Trump himself asking Russia for help in his contest with Hillary Clinton.

Two...HOW IN THE NAME OF JESUS H. CHRIST CAN ANY AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE POSSIBLY STILL BE BOTHERED BY HILLARY CLINTON SENDING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO SOMEONE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE THEM ON A SECURE SERVER...WHEN THE JERKOFF IN CHIEF ALLOWS PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO VIEW CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS...PEOPLE SUSCEPTIBLE TO BLACKMAIL...TO READ THEM EVERY DAY IN THE FUCKING OVAL OFFICE?

typing in large font doesn't make your statements any more correct.

One...this is Trump himself asking Russia for help in his contest with Hillary Clinton.

no .
It's Trump saying exactly what he said..there are multiple possibilities he wants them found.
Of course they might be helpful for his election , but he might want them found to prosecute Hillary for
"Gross negligence". you are making an unfounded assumption here based off 1 sentence

I love how you guys always look for a sinister meaning when the language is clear, or when it's not clear also look for a sinister meaning.
But then calling him "jerkoff in chief" shows you really aren't interested in discussing -just editorializing.
++

the rest of your quote is garbled hash.
You simply do not understand the consequences of sending classified info from her server -
whether the recipient has a classified account or not. Some of these even wound up on Weiner's laptop

[PostmodernProphet]

Another rib-tickler from Trump ...

Obama was the founder of ISIS

August 12, 2016
Donald Trump said Thursday that he meant exactly what he said when he called President Barack Obama the "founder of ISIS" and objected when a conservative radio show host tried to clarify the GOP nominee's position.

Trump was asked by host Hugh Hewitt about the comments Trump made Wednesday night in Florida. Hewitt said he understood Trump to mean that Obama created the vacuum, he lost the peace.

Trump objected. "No, I meant he's the founder of ISIS," Trump said. "I do. He was the most valuable player. I give him the most valuable player award. I give her, too, by the way, Hillary Clinton."

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/08/11/p...sis/index.html

It's the way he tells 'em!

give credit where credit is due......

[Frank Apisa]

Try again.

Last Updated Jan 29, 2016 9:46 PM EST
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/22-top-...t-be-released/

The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained some of the U.S. government's most closely guarded secrets, censoring 22 emails with material demanding one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.

Any Trump supporter still sniffing around that dead dog...is a hoot.

If you want to be one of those people...fine with me.

As I said...(and stand by)...HOW IN THE NAME OF JESUS H. CHRIST CAN ANY AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE POSSIBLY STILL BE BOTHERED BY HILLARY CLINTON SENDING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO SOMEONE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE THEM ON A SECURE SERVER...WHEN THE JERKOFF IN CHIEF ALLOWS PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO VIEW CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS...PEOPLE SUSCEPTIBLE TO BLACKMAIL...TO READ THEM EVERY DAY IN THE FUCKING OVAL OFFICE?

[Frank Apisa]

Tell us how you really feel!

(P.S. I feel the same.)

Thanks, Christiefan.

I cannot see how any of these guys do not feel the same as us...except for cosmic delusion.

[Frank Apisa]

One—Trump was clearly mocking Hillary and her self-inflicted email dilemma.

Two—Trump is president and gets to decide who sees what lol.

Another one backing dear leader.

[Frank Apisa]

without a moment's hesitation.....wake me if you find something......

The entire world, at this point, knows the investigation is not complete, PP.

What more evidence do you need?

[Frank Apisa]

and what conclusion did you draw from that?......I know most of the country got a good laugh out of it at Hilliary's expense.....

No need to draw a conclusion.

He said what he said...and I posted what he said.

[Frank Apisa]

is it your belief that because they have not yet found evidence the investigation is not complete?......if so the investigation may continue through our lifetime.......

It may...but I think not. If I were to bet...I would bet on it finishing sometime in the middle of this year.

[Frank Apisa]

if he's the joke, why are we laughing at you?....

Probably has something to do with a lack of intelligence on the part of the "we."

[Frank Apisa]

typing in large font doesn't make your statements any more correct.

You are right. What makes my statement correct...is that it is correct.

no .
It's Trump saying exactly what he said..there are multiple possibilities he wants them found.
Of course they might be helpful for his election , but he might want them found to prosecute Hillary for
"Gross negligence". you are making an unfounded assumption here based off 1 sentence

I love how you guys always look for a sinister meaning when the language is clear, or when it's not clear also look for a sinister meaning.
But then calling him "jerkoff in chief" shows you really aren't interested in discussing -just editorializing.
++

the rest of your quote is garbled hash.
You simply do not understand the consequences of sending classified info from her server -
whether the recipient has a classified account or not. Some of these even wound up on Weiner's laptop

Stick with dear leader, Noise.

Others have done the same sort of thing...and caused huge damage to our planet.

[Darth Omar]

You are right. What makes my statement correct...is that it is correct.



Stick with dear leader, Noise.

Others have done the same sort of thing...and caused huge damage to our planet.

The Russians are playing you goof balls like a fiddle.

The Russians.

[Nordberg]

Last week Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein stated that the Russian objective in the 2016 election was to “sow discord” and not aid a given candidate.

Granted, Mueller isn’t finished but it’s unlikely he would make a later pronouncement that would contradict the findings contained in last weeks set of indictments. Which notably, didn’t affect a single US citizen.

So why don’t the JPP lefties and the Left more generally, accept that conclusion?

Not Muellers conclusions. As you said, Rosenstin said that. Mueller has said nothing. So change that title for starters. If you read the indictment, you would know the Russians settled on backing Trump . It may be because Trump was such a horrible candidate that they backed him, if you believe their intention was mere disruption. I doubt that. Trumps financial intanglements with Russian plutocrats is well known. Money laundering may be the last stop on the Mueller train.

[Stretch]

Why does Frank keep saying Hillary's emails were sent from her unsecured server to someone with a secured server?

[Darth Omar]

Not Muellers conclusions. As you said, Rosenstin said that. Mueller has said nothing. So change that title for starters. If you read the indictment, you would know the Russians settled on backing Trump . It may be because Trump was such a horrible candidate that they backed him, if you believe their intention was mere disruption. I doubt that. Trumps financial intanglements with Russian plutocrats is well known. Money laundering may be the last stop on the Mueller train.

In terms of finding the Holy Grail of Collusion the train is stuck in the depot lol.

Horse hockey. Why would Rosenweasel make a claim that contradicts the indictments?

[PostmodernProphet]

The entire world, at this point, knows the investigation is not complete, PP.

What more evidence do you need?

perhaps something about collusion........yes, I definitely think an investigation with nothing about collusion is over......