For leftists: What would have been a Something Burger for you?

**Stretch** · 02-05-2018, 01:14 PM

Originally Posted by Darth Omar

Lol idk.

Show me the collusion?

LOL. While they're at it, show us the obstruction.

**Minister of Truth** · 02-05-2018, 01:22 PM

Originally Posted by Bourbon

Will Donald be Impeached for Collusion?

I doubt it. His greatest risk will be, as with Clinton, committing perjury, given that he's pathologically predisposed to lying. Granted, he has tons of experience testifying under oath.

**tsuke** · 02-05-2018, 01:24 PM

Originally Posted by Darth Omar

Bingo.

If they wanted an SP to investigate the election, they should have made the mandate to include ALL SIDES of the election.

i want a different sp for this.

**Bourbon** · 02-05-2018, 01:25 PM

Originally Posted by Threedee

I doubt it. His greatest risk will be, as with Clinton, committing perjury, given that he's pathologically predisposed to lying. Granted, he has tons of experience testifying under oath.

Don't forget Money Laundering ....

Can you imagine if Obama did 1/110 of what Trump has done.

**Minister of Truth** · 02-05-2018, 01:26 PM

Originally Posted by Bourbon

Don't forget Money Laundering ....

Can you imagine if Obama did 1/110 of what Trump has done.

He 110/110.

**Darth Omar** · 02-05-2018, 01:33 PM

Originally Posted by tsuke

i want a different sp for this.

I get the idea that’s the impetus behind the memo.

Or have Rosenstein expand Mueller’s mandate to include democrat/Deep State shenanigans.

**Nordberg** · 02-05-2018, 01:34 PM

Originally Posted by Teflon Don

So now that liberals have had a chance to digest the Nunes memo and it seems to be the consensus among them that it was a big nothing.

Tell us what would have been SOMETHING? What would you need to have seen for it to rise to the level of a Something Burger for you?

A different memo that actually proved something. Nunes is shameful.

**Darth Omar** · 02-05-2018, 01:38 PM

Originally Posted by Bourbon

Don't forget Money Laundering ....

Can you imagine if Obama did 1/110 of what Trump has done.

What has Trump done?

I thought Mueller was still trying to figure it out lol.

**Jarod** · 02-05-2018, 01:54 PM

Originally Posted by Darth Omar

So, they appointed an SP to investigate collusion even though there was no evidence of collusion?

No wonder they lied to the FISA court.

There is some evidence of collusion and after Rump admitted he fired Comey over the investigation, Obstruction had to be looked into by an independent agent.

**countryboy** · 02-05-2018, 02:10 PM

Originally Posted by Teflon Don

So now that liberals have had a chance to digest the Nunes memo and it seems to be the consensus among them that it was a big nothing.

Tell us what would have been SOMETHING? What would you need to have seen for it to rise to the level of a Something Burger for you?

Actually, for libs, it was a something burger before it was a nothing burger. Remember how concerned they were about how releasing the memo would be detrimental to national security? Then, after it's release they're like, meh, wotta nothing burger.

#libsrscum

**Darth Omar** · 02-05-2018, 03:27 PM

Originally Posted by Jarod

There is some evidence of collusion and after Rump admitted he fired Comey over the investigation, Obstruction had to be looked into by an independent agent.

Some evidence lol?

How about an independent investigation to see if Comey set-up Trump? Maybe have a look at the texts between he and his lawyer buddy.

And a really *independent* SP. Someone who lives and works outside the Beltway who doesn’t know the people involved and sure as hell doesn’t know the Clintons, or isn’t otherwise mixed up with some of the principals involved.

Enough of the fricking incest.

**dukkha** · 02-05-2018, 03:31 PM

Originally Posted by Jarod

There is some evidence of collusion and after Rump admitted he fired Comey over the investigation, Obstruction had to be looked into by an independent agent.

Obstructionism isn't Russian collusion. Obsructionism would be a process crime, caused by the FBI investigation.

No investigation=no obstructionism

**Darth Omar** · 02-05-2018, 03:41 PM

Originally Posted by noise

Obstructionism isn't Russian collusion. Obsructionism would be a process crime, caused by the FBI investigation.

No investigation=no obstructionism

And with the economy going the way it is republicans won’t vote to impeach.

**Nordberg** · 02-05-2018, 03:46 PM

Originally Posted by Stretch

LOL. While they're at it, show us the obstruction.

Giggle giggle, Ask Page, Manafort, Papadopolous and Flynn about it. That is what they pleaded guilty to. The obstruction is a certainty.

**Jarod** · 02-05-2018, 08:53 PM

Originally Posted by noise

Obstructionism isn't Russian collusion. Obsructionism would be a process crime, caused by the FBI investigation.

No investigation=no obstructionism

That’s terrible backward logic. If you intentionally hinder an investigation, it’s Obstruction, regardless of if they get you on another crime or not... otherwise if you are successful at obstruction... you could never be prosecuted.