Members banned from this thread: evince, canceled.2021.3 and Русский агент


Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Senate confirms Jerome Powell as Fed chairman

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default Senate confirms Jerome Powell as Fed chairman

    So he passes with a large bi-partisan majority but both Democrats and Republicans who either ran for President or are going to run for President opposed. What is their play here?



    Senate confirms Jerome Powell as Fed chairman


    The Senate on Tuesday voted to confirm Federal Reserve Governor Jerome Powell as the next chairman of the central bank by an overwhelming bipartisan margin.
    The vote on Powell’s confirmation quickly cleared the simple majority of senators necessary to confirm him to replace Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen on Feb. 3. The final count stood at 85-12, one of the widest margins of confirmation for a Trump nominee.

    Nearly all Republicans and a vast majority of Democrats supported Powell's confirmation. Those opposed included conservative GOP Sens. Ted Cruz (Texas), Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Mike Lee (Utah), and potential 2020 Democratic presidential candidates Sens. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Kamala Harris (Calif.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

    The Senate voted earlier Tuesday afternoon to end debate on Powell’s nomination in an 84-12 vote.

    Trump nominated Powell to replace Yellen as chair in November. Powell had served on the Fed board since his appointment by former President Obama in 2012. The Senate Banking Committee approved Powell's nomination by a near-unanimous vote in December, with only Warren opposing him.

    Powell supported every decision Yellen made regarding monetary policy, wooing Democrats who praised the current chairwoman's steady hand. While many Democrats said they wished Trump renominated Yellen, they were reassured by Powell's almost identical views on regulation and monetary policy.

    Republicans pressed Powell on making broader changes to the Dodd-Frank Act, but posed little opposition to his closeness to Yellen on monetary policy.

    Powell supports a slew of moderate fixes to the Dodd-Frank Act backed by several regulators across the ideological spectrum. He's advocated for reducing the number of banks forced to comply with the Volcker Rule and lowering the threshold at which a bank is considered big enough to warrant signficant federal oversight.
    Powell has also supported reducing the frequency of federal stress tests and revealing more about the way the Fed judges the riskiness of big banks.


    http://thehill.com/policy/finance/37...s-fed-chairman

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to cawacko For This Post:

    Bigdog (01-23-2018)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,104
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 806 Times in 671 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 326 Times in 306 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    So he passes with a large bi-partisan majority but both Democrats and Republicans who either ran for President or are going to run for President opposed. What is their play here?
    Hedging their bets in case they become POTUS if they want to replace him in which case they can argue they didn't vote for his appointment in the first place?

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PraiseKek View Post
    Hedging their bets in case they become POTUS if they want to replace him in which case they can argue they didn't vote for his appointment in the first place?
    Makes sense. Guess they figure there's no real downside risk?

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,104
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 806 Times in 671 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 326 Times in 306 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    Makes sense. Guess they figure there's no real downside risk?
    Ya his confirmation was a given so no down side in a nay vote and a possible future talking point.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-07-2017, 09:06 PM
  2. APP - Who should be the new Chairman of the DNC?
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-21-2016, 10:16 AM
  3. Meet the new RNC Chairman
    By Damocles in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-18-2011, 09:54 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-09-2009, 01:22 PM
  5. Senate report confirms Bush lied; media shrugs
    By Onceler in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 06-06-2008, 09:20 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •