Phantasmal (01-23-2018)
There is no conspiracy there, Sessions did sit down with Mueller, and the image, given Session dates back to the early days, doesn't look good for the White House, which is why you are seeing the sudden rash of double secret memo innuendos floating in the right wing media
Just the facts
DoJ routinely delays docs to Congress -all the Committees.
If they turn it over to DoJ prior to release what do you think will happen? it will put in in the pile for redacts.. and then say they don't want it released until DoJ determines the redacts.
1.Clinton Emails under subpoena were destroyed,and the devices BleachBit washed and hammered into pieces.
2.Lehnr Emails were "lost" ( and now found)
3.Now the FBI loses critical texts - or claims they weren't archived?
^ do you see a pattern here?
++
The Nunes memo will speak for itself.
But Nunes is not "refusing to release it"- it links ( refers) to classified and has to be voted on by the committee
to get released,and then a short waiting period to see if the executive objects.
++
Why would Sessions NOT be interviewed? If Mueller is looking at decade old bank transactions,
surely he would get an interview?
Who is he? You didn't think the Inspector General was actually just one person did you? And don't come back and deflect wanting to argue that the head of the agency is the Inspector General
And I don't know, nor care, has nothing to do with anything other than the "looks like" based conspiracy that the FBI has "secret societies" and "dark states" that are all working to undermine Trump
It's a fact because you say so, anchovies?
What "facts" substantiate your theory that Sessions talking to Mueller "doesn't look good for the White House," and what factual source can you cite for your assertion that is the reason "why you are seeing the sudden rash of double secret memo innuendos floating in the right wing media," anchovies?
Again, all the "looks likes" in the world don't on their own prove anything, especially when you cite three that occurred in separate circumstances over the course of what, seven years? You have to have proof, otherwise it is just pure innuendo
He isn't releasing it, and it is as you said links, his interpretation of links, not the actually facts
It wasn't public record, and the fact that he was and no one knew leads one to guess who else has already been interviewed and what direction Mueller is actually going
And they are not releasing this supposed proof to the Justice Department because they are afraid the Justice Dept will censor parts of it for public release because it involves classified information? That doesn't even sound right given that the classified information was revealed behind closed doors by a Congressional Committee, if such, they should be investigated for releasing that classified information.
The fact that Nunes, again, the same Nunes that had to make that secret night Uber run to the White House, is basing it all on a memo he compiled, you can't be that naive
Phantasmal (01-23-2018)
Bookmarks