Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 53

Thread: FBI loses texts

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,104
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 806 Times in 671 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 326 Times in 306 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    "how convenient" isn't proof of anything, a small procedural fact you conservatives seem to conveniently overlook

    So wait a minute, Nunes and Gowdy have definite proof but they don't want any proof of wrongdoing going over to the Justice Dept'? the Justice Department? For real?
    Main Justice is compromised as is the FBI, Strzok, Page, Ohr, McCabe, Rosenstein, OH MY!

    What a tangled web.

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,239 Times in 13,964 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Right View Post
    LOL A software glitch that affected four separate devices at the same time.

    Again wrong, it involved software upgrades, which as I said is easily verifiable and Sessions himself said the same yesterday and the verification was underway, but again, why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy. Where was Obama born again?

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Phantasmal (01-23-2018)

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,104
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 806 Times in 671 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 326 Times in 306 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Wrong, FBI has said it was a software glitch that also plagued other FBI employees at the same time. It is easily verifiable and is currently being investigated by the Justice Dept., but don't let the facts upset a good conspiracy
    Who in the DOJ is investigating sir? Is it Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, or Rod Rosenstein?

  5. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,239 Times in 13,964 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God bless America View Post
    What was that you said about conspiracy theories, anchovies?
    There is no conspiracy there, Sessions did sit down with Mueller, and the image, given Session dates back to the early days, doesn't look good for the White House, which is why you are seeing the sudden rash of double secret memo innuendos floating in the right wing media

    Just the facts

  6. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Again wrong, it involved software upgrades, which as I said is easily verifiable and Sessions himself said the same yesterday and the verification was underway, but again, why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy. Where was Obama born again?
    Upgrades that just happened to affect four separate machines...

  7. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    "how convenient" isn't proof of anything, a small procedural fact you conservatives seem to conveniently overlook

    So wait a minute, Nunes and Gowdy have definite proof but they don't want any proof of wrongdoing going over to the Justice Dept'? the Justice Department? For real?

    Nunes won't release his double secret memo to anyone, which in fact, it isn't facts, but his personal completion of the facts as he sees it, which is the real reason he refused to release it

    It was revealed today that Sessions sat down and was interviewed by Mueller last week, which doesn't look good for the White House given he was a party to everything from the early stages of the campaign till today, so, consequently, the White House has pulled out their House stooges to lay on the conspiracy of the day to deflect off of that news. Timing in all this stuff is telling
    DoJ routinely delays docs to Congress -all the Committees.
    If they turn it over to DoJ prior to release what do you think will happen? it will put in in the pile for redacts.. and then say they don't want it released until DoJ determines the redacts.

    1.Clinton Emails under subpoena were destroyed,and the devices BleachBit washed and hammered into pieces.
    2.Lehnr Emails were "lost" ( and now found)
    3.Now the FBI loses critical texts - or claims they weren't archived?

    ^ do you see a pattern here?
    ++

    The Nunes memo will speak for itself.
    But Nunes is not "refusing to release it"- it links ( refers) to classified and has to be voted on by the committee
    to get released,and then a short waiting period to see if the executive objects.
    ++

    Why would Sessions NOT be interviewed? If Mueller is looking at decade old bank transactions,
    surely he would get an interview?

  8. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,239 Times in 13,964 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God bless America View Post
    So he didn't have all the texts when he told the Senate he did but that's not a lie, anchovies?

    Or does he actually have all the texts but thousands are "lost"?
    Who is he? You didn't think the Inspector General was actually just one person did you? And don't come back and deflect wanting to argue that the head of the agency is the Inspector General

    And I don't know, nor care, has nothing to do with anything other than the "looks like" based conspiracy that the FBI has "secret societies" and "dark states" that are all working to undermine Trump

  9. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,104
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 806 Times in 671 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 326 Times in 306 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Again wrong, it involved software upgrades, which as I said is easily verifiable and Sessions himself said the same yesterday and the verification was underway, but again, why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy.
    Sessions is recused from the Russian investigation, Rosenstein has been taking point this whole time. Rosenstein was directly above Ohr and is bossom buddies with Strzok, Page, McCabe, and Comey so spare me your bs.



    Where was Obama born again?

  10. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    There is no conspiracy there, Sessions did sit down with Mueller, and the image, given Session dates back to the early days, doesn't look good for the White House, which is why you are seeing the sudden rash of double secret memo innuendos floating in the right wing media Just the facts
    It's a fact because you say so, anchovies?

    What "facts" substantiate your theory that Sessions talking to Mueller "doesn't look good for the White House," and what factual source can you cite for your assertion that is the reason "why you are seeing the sudden rash of double secret memo innuendos floating in the right wing media," anchovies?

  11. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    Again wrong, it involved software upgrades, which as I said is easily verifiable and Sessions himself said the same yesterday and the verification was underway, but again, why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy. Where was Obama born again?
    If it's "easily verifiable", verify it, anchovies.

  12. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,239 Times in 13,964 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noise View Post
    DoJ routinely delays docs to Congress -all the Committees.
    If they turn it over to DoJ prior to release what do you think will happen? it will put in in the pile for redacts.. and then say they don't want it released until DoJ determines the redacts.

    1.Clinton Emails under subpoena were destroyed,and the devices BleachBit washed and hammered into pieces.
    2.Lehnr Emails were "lost" ( and now found)
    3.Now the FBI loses critical texts - or claims they weren't archived?

    ^ do you see a pattern here?
    ++

    The Nunes memo will speak for itself.
    But Nunes is not "refusing to release it"- it links ( refers) to classified and has to be voted on by the committee
    to get released,and then a short waiting period to see if the executive objects.
    ++

    Why would Sessions NOT be interviewed? If Mueller is looking at decade old bank transactions,
    surely he would get an interview?
    Again, all the "looks likes" in the world don't on their own prove anything, especially when you cite three that occurred in separate circumstances over the course of what, seven years? You have to have proof, otherwise it is just pure innuendo

    He isn't releasing it, and it is as you said links, his interpretation of links, not the actually facts

    It wasn't public record, and the fact that he was and no one knew leads one to guess who else has already been interviewed and what direction Mueller is actually going

    And they are not releasing this supposed proof to the Justice Department because they are afraid the Justice Dept will censor parts of it for public release because it involves classified information? That doesn't even sound right given that the classified information was revealed behind closed doors by a Congressional Committee, if such, they should be investigated for releasing that classified information.

    The fact that Nunes, again, the same Nunes that had to make that secret night Uber run to the White House, is basing it all on a memo he compiled, you can't be that naive

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Phantasmal (01-23-2018)

  14. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,239 Times in 13,964 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God bless America View Post
    If it's "easily verifiable", verify it, anchovies.
    Not keeping up I see, Sessions said yesterday that the AG's office is investigating such, want to try again?

  15. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    Who is he? You didn't think the Inspector General was actually just one person did you? And don't come back and deflect wanting to argue that the head of the agency is the Inspector General And I don't know, nor care, has nothing to do with anything other than the "looks like" based conspiracy that the FBI has "secret societies" and "dark states" that are all working to undermine Trump
    "He" is Michael E. Horowitz, anchovies. The IG of the DoJ who signed the letter addressed to the Senators in question.

    If you'd read the letter you'd know that.

  16. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    Not keeping up I see, Sessions said yesterday that the AG's office is investigating such, want to try again?
    That's not what you said is "easily verifiable," is it, anchovies?

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    Again wrong, it involved software upgrades, which as I said is easily verifiable and Sessions himself said the same yesterday and the verification was underway, but again, why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy. Where was Obama born again?

  17. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    The fact that Nunes, again, the same Nunes that had to make that secret night Uber run to the White House, is basing it all on a memo he compiled, you can't be that naive
    If it was "secret", how do you know about it, anchovies?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-15-2017, 01:14 PM
  2. 'Over 10,000 texts' between anti-Trump Mueller officials found
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-06-2017, 08:27 PM
  3. Replies: 106
    Last Post: 12-04-2017, 09:43 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-29-2016, 03:32 PM
  5. Defense Releases Photos, Texts of Trayvon Martin
    By RockX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: 06-07-2013, 03:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •