Members banned from this thread: evince, canceled.2021.3 and Русский агент


Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 135

Thread: Trump slaps big tariffs on imported solar panels in major escalation of a trade fight

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,855
    Thanks
    3,734
    Thanked 20,360 Times in 14,088 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default Trump slaps big tariffs on imported solar panels in major escalation of a trade fight

    We already know what people think of Trump here be it good or bad, I'm curious what people think of these tariffs. In today's environment I don't know that being pro or against tariffs falls neatly along party lines.




    Trump slaps big tariffs on imported solar panels in major escalation of a trade fight with China


    The Trump administration announced Monday that it would impose hefty tariffs on the cheap, imported panels that have driven the rapid expansion of solar power in the United States, a move that industry groups warned would slow the spread of renewable energy and cost thousands of jobs.

    The tariffs come as President Trump has vowed to take a tough line against cheap foreign imports that he blames for undercutting American manufacturing industries.

    The administration also announced it would impose hefty tariffs on imported large residential washing machines. In both cases, inexpensive imports — mostly from China in the case of the solar panels — have undercut U.S. manufacturers, administration officials said.

    Imports from China have been a particular target of Trump's rhetoric. The tariffs are the most concrete step that he has taken to put those words into action. They mark the start of what many analysts expect will be a series of tougher actions on trade by Trump in the coming months, especially against China, with whom the U.S. has a huge trade deficit.

    The administration also has taken moves against imports of Chinese-made steel and aluminum and is considering sweeping sanctions against China for allegedly stealing U.S. intellectual property and forcing American companies to hand over technology secrets to do business in China.

    Trump acted after the government's International Trade Commission "found that U.S. producers had been seriously injured by imports," said U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer. "The president's action makes clear again that the Trump administration will always defend American workers, farmers, ranchers and businesses."

    But the move against imported solar panels also threatens some of the very types of jobs that Trump has vowed to protect. Companies that install solar panels will probably trim their workforces, industry analysts warned, as the tariff — which starts at 30% on the imported panels and gradually declines each year — threatens to substantially raise the price of solar power in the United States.

    Imposition of the tariffs drew protests from environmentalists, who said the move would set back efforts to combat global warming, and from the solar power industry.

    The levies, said Abigail Ross Hopper, chief executive of the Solar Energy Industries Assn., "will create a crisis in a part of our economy that has been thriving, which will ultimately cost tens of thousands of hard-working, blue-collar Americans their jobs."

    California, where the renewables industry has taken off, will be among the states hardest hit by the new levies.

    The industry trade group estimates the tariffs on solar panels will cost 23,000 jobs nationwide within the year, and that billions of dollars in potential investment in solar power will evaporate because of them.

    The move also drew protest from some Republicans who said it violated the party's long-standing support for free trade.

    "Here's something Republicans used to understand: Tariffs are taxes on families," said Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.).

    The case for tariffs was filed at the International Trade Commission by two American firms that say their businesses have been crushed by cheap imports from Asia and Europe, which by now account for more than 90% of the solar panels installed in the U.S.

    The trade commission voted last month 4-0 in favor of imposing tariffs. It said the action was needed to confront the near-extinction of an American industry.

    The commission found that the cheap imported panels had played a major role in a boom in solar power. The tripling of solar capacity in the U.S. was "spurred on by artificially low-priced solar cells and modules from China," the commission said.

    But the import boom also has contributed to more than two dozen U.S. solar manufacturers closing since 2012.

    Government incentives in China have enabled its solar panel makers to produce 61% of the world's solar panels, the trade commission said. In 2005, China produced just 7%.
    Few analysts, however, beyond those hired by the firms that filed the trade petition, project the tariffs will revive the panel-manufacturing industry.

    The companies that filed the complaint had pushed for far steeper tariffs than Trump ultimately imposed, aiming for a remedy that would have lifted the cost of imported panels from 35 cents per watt to 78 cents, which is around the cost of the American product.

    Under Trump's plan, the initial 30% tariff would decline by 5 percentage points each year. The tariff would last for four years. The first 2.5 gigawatts of imported solar panels would be exempted from the tariff each year.

    The tariffs on washing machines are even steeper than those on solar panels: Trump approved tariffs of up to 50% on imports of finished washers as well as on major parts that go into them, such as plastic tubs and metal drums.

    The tariffs, set for three years, were sought by the appliance maker Whirlpool Corp., which operates washer plants in the United States and employs about 15,000 manufacturing workers.

    The action targeted two Korean companies, Samsung and LG, which have made significant gains in U.S. market share for residential washers in recent years. Both companies recently have moved to open assembly plants in the U.S., but the new tariffs on imported washer parts means that the machines will be more expensive for them to produce even on American soil.

    Whirlpool argued that Samsung and LG were exporting washers at unfair prices and that they had repeatedly avoided previous country-specific tariffs by shifting production from Korea and Mexico to China and most recently to Thailand and Vietnam.

    The unfair competition, Whirlpool said, had hurt its sales and curbed its employment, despite large investments at plants like the one in Clyde, Ohio, where some 3,000 people work.

    "This announcement caps nearly a decade of litigation and will result in new manufacturing jobs in Ohio, Kentucky, South Carolina and Tennessee," Whirlpool Chairman Jeff M. Fettig said in a statement Monday.

    But officials in South Carolina and Tennessee, where the two Korean companies have factories, had warned that a tariff could cost jobs in their states.

    "Today's announcement is a great loss for American consumers and workers," Samsung said in a statement. "This tariff is a tax on every consumer who wants to buy a washing machine. Everyone will pay more, with fewer choices."

    The two firms that brought the solar case — Georgia-based Suniva, which is in bankruptcy, and Oregon-based Solar World Americas, a struggling subsidiary of the bankrupt German firm SolarWorld AG — sought relief through the filing of what is known as a "section 201" case.

    That provision of the nation's trade law allows the president to broadly impose tariffs if the trade commission finds the move is needed to protect an American industry from economic peril.

    The provision had not been exercised since 2001, when President George W. Bush invoked it to protect U.S. steelmakers from imports. Other nations retaliated, and the World Trade Organization ultimately voided the levies.

    The solar tariffs could ultimately meet the same fate. The World Trade Organization applies a high standard for proving injury. But even if it ultimately rejects the administration's tariffs, the levies will remain in place until it does.

    The firms applauded Trump's move. "The president is sending a message that American innovation and manufacturing will not be bullied out of existence without a fight," said a statement from Suniva.

    On the other side, the Natural Resources Defense Council, a leading environmental group, said the decision would reverse the progress toward greater use of solar energy.

    "Higher-priced panels will dramatically reduce the pace of new solar energy installations, increase climate-changing emissions, and lead to significant job losses nationwide," the group said.


    http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...122-story.html

  2. The Following User Groans At cawacko For This Awful Post:

    canceled.2021.2 (01-23-2018)

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to cawacko For This Post:

    Bigdog (01-23-2018)

  4. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The problem with knowing if this is a good or bad thing, is that the results won't be known for quite a while. If the tariffs encourage US manufacturing growth, they presumably would be good. However, if they don't and do cost jobs and an increase in the price of solar energy/panels, then it likely will be a bad thing.

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    5,115
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,177 Times in 991 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 313 Times in 276 Posts

    Default

    These tariffs should help the coal industry, which will piss of the Dems who want to see all the coal miners unemployed.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to hvilleherb For This Post:

    canceled.2021.3 (01-23-2018)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,107
    Thanks
    560
    Thanked 1,031 Times in 698 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 24 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    I'd rather not be dependant on China for our energy, and they are currently the largest supplier of green energy tech. Not a fan of tariffs generally, but this is one of the less egregious uses of them.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Peridot For This Post:

    canceled.2021.3 (01-23-2018)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    good : ) maybe we can make the panels in the US as well as installing it <3
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peridot View Post
    I'd rather not be dependant on China for our energy, and they are currently the largest supplier of green energy tech. Not a fan of tariffs generally, but this is one of the less egregious uses of them.
    this is also true. We are dependent on other countries on oil as well or at least we used to be.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,288
    Thanks
    3,870
    Thanked 5,011 Times in 3,467 Posts
    Groans
    1,286
    Groaned 494 Times in 452 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Greens should applaud this. Chinese companies manufactures items with less environmental regulation than US companies. Externalities is one of the favorite words they love to throw around. What are the costs, that are not readily apparent, associated with Chinese panels? How many chinese citizens suffer from the effects of dirty manufacturing? All questions the greens love to ask but will ignore completely because it's much more politically advantageous to beat up on Trump for trying to hurt solar energy.

    But China joined the Paris Accord, so Trump bad!

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tinfoil View Post
    Greens should applaud this. Chinese companies manufactures items with less environmental regulation than US companies. Externalities is one of the favorite words they love to throw around. What are the costs, that are not readily apparent, associated with Chinese panels? How many chinese citizens suffer from the effects of dirty manufacturing? All questions the greens love to ask but will ignore completely because it's much more politically advantageous to beat up on Trump for trying to hurt solar energy.

    But China joined the Paris Accord, so Trump bad!
    they should heil trump shouldnt they?
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  13. The Following User Groans At tsuke For This Awful Post:

    Rune (01-24-2018)

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,465
    Thanks
    16,662
    Thanked 20,734 Times in 14,330 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    The problem with knowing if this is a good or bad thing, is that the results won't be known for quite a while. If the tariffs encourage US manufacturing growth, they presumably would be good. However, if they don't and do cost jobs and an increase in the price of solar energy/panels, then it likely will be a bad thing.
    True. I'm a believer in tariffs in order to level the playing field, but ultimately it means that the real prices for these products are much higher than consumers are now paying. Obama did it with Chinese tires, and everyone motherfucked him when tire pricing went up.

    trump likes this because it will make the price of solar energy higher, after a steady decline over the last decade.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    Phantasmal (01-23-2018), Rune (01-24-2018), ThatOwlWoman (01-23-2018)

  16. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,465
    Thanks
    16,662
    Thanked 20,734 Times in 14,330 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hvilleherb View Post
    These tariffs should help the coal industry, which will piss of the Dems who want to see all the coal miners unemployed.
    Yea..because we import so much coal.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-23-2018)

  18. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,465
    Thanks
    16,662
    Thanked 20,734 Times in 14,330 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peridot View Post
    I'd rather not be dependant on China for our energy, and they are currently the largest supplier of green energy tech. Not a fan of tariffs generally, but this is one of the less egregious uses of them.
    Because China isn't owned by Big Oil, the way the U.S is. We should have jumped on that bandwagon a long time ago, but Bush 'didn't believe' in alternative energy. That's why he slow walked his Solyndra deal. By the time the loans went through, Obama was in office, and Arizona created a haven for Chinese solar factories.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  19. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,107
    Thanks
    560
    Thanked 1,031 Times in 698 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 24 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Because China isn't owned by Big Oil, the way the U.S is. We should have jumped on that bandwagon a long time ago, but Bush 'didn't believe' in alternative energy. That's why he slow walked his Solyndra deal. By the time the loans went through, Obama was in office, and Arizona created a haven for Chinese solar factories.
    China is the primary source for the raw material and rare earths used in making much of the green energy tech available today. So that's who pushes green energy here and abroad. If you want to promote homegrown energy, here in America you need to support nuclear.

  20. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,465
    Thanks
    16,662
    Thanked 20,734 Times in 14,330 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peridot View Post
    China is the primary source for the raw material and rare earths used in making much of the green energy tech available today. So that's who pushes green energy here and abroad. If you want to promote homegrown energy, here in America you need to support nuclear.
    Or nat. gas. Or coal. That's not the issue here. We import all kinds of raw materials from Canada, for building products. China nationalizes all money makers. They decide what they'll invest in based on a much smarter outlook than that which history has shown in this country.

    In essence, lobbyists create our energy policy. China doesn't have that issue.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  21. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,960
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,037 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hvilleherb View Post
    These tariffs should help the coal industry, which will piss of the Dems who want to see all the coal miners unemployed.
    Amazing how some conservative think it is important to save what has to be the worst job in America, one minimally needed and antiquated

    As for the topic, it is pissing off South Korea, and why solar panels? Of all the items, why solar panels?

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-23-2018)

  23. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    28,688
    Thanks
    26,423
    Thanked 14,245 Times in 9,790 Posts
    Groans
    563
    Groaned 606 Times in 573 Posts

    Default

    Trump slaps big tariffs on imported solar panels in major escalation of a trade fight
    Trump hits liberals in the pocketbook ... to STOP them from buying solar panels manufactured by slave labor and creation of toxic waste in Chinese villages.

    Forces Liberals to buy their solar panels from Overpaid American Socialist Union workers regulated by the EPA ... priceless!.


    "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
    — Joe Biden on Obama.

    Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.

    D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.

    Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 10-10-2016, 05:16 PM
  2. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-18-2016, 09:12 PM
  3. APP - a big health insurance company paid a trade association $850,000 to fight the aca
    By Don Quixote in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-14-2013, 02:30 AM
  4. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-22-2012, 06:24 AM
  5. The Bush Escalation
    By Cancel7 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-18-2007, 11:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •