Never Trumpers somehow have to square the circle of their principled Never Trumpism, with Trump’s results. They don’t like Gorsuch? They don’t like the economy? They favor the status quo on immigration?
Ironically, one is forced to wonder what their principles are, exactly. Since they’re apparently not conservative principles.
And yes, they unwittingly end up sounding like liberals.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
why don't you source your shit?
Then it can be shown what it is - a response to Russian attacks on NATO countries or the US itself..
If we get to the point Russia is going after NATO members..we have already crossed the rubicon.
( another reason to stay out of the Ukraine's business/war)
I'm sure this is bluster, but for once I agree with you. it's a very bad idea.
Where does it come from?? Our new Deep State friend - Russia phobia.
If you had a brain you'd connect the dots to our new extreme hostile posture started under Obama and continued under Trump , given life because sane people like Flynn were politically thown out in favor of "Trump's Generals"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.3cc3afd72feb
Where the review goes ballistic is its assignment of U.S. nuclear weapons to deter — and if deterrence fails, to attack Russia if Russian President Vladimir Putin orders a non-nuclear strategic attack against the United States and its NATO allies. This mission is alleged to justify acquiring additional weapons with low-yield explosive power (in addition to the 1,000 already operational or held in reserve) to buttress the credibility of this first-use threat.
fucking tactical nukes -battlefield nukes.What is the feared scenario of Russia aggression that would warrant such escalation? The document points to what it calls non-nuclear strategic attacks against civilian populations and infrastructure: “The United States would only consider the use of nuclear weapons in extreme circumstances to defend the vital interests of the United States, its allies, and partners. Extreme circumstances could include significant non-nuclear strategic attacks. Significant non-nuclear strategic attacks include, but are not limited to, attacks on the U.S., allied, or partner civilian population or infrastructure.”
This shit started as a response by Putin to Obama's European Reassurance Initiative
Dolt. study up on Russian expansion into the Middle east, and not just Syria.Originally Posted by noise
That's like telling me realpolitik doesn't work because Putin is a corrupt oligarch. He's a bad guy so don't deal with him etc.
Obama was a smooth talker, but his foreign policy left a wasteland in the ME and to a lessor extent Asia.
Lots of soft power in Egypt and soon Libya, as well as geo-political with Iran.
McCain: "we are at war with Russia"
Graham:"I want to throw rocks at Russia" -warmongering dolts
So now you are just making stuff up. That's all you have left, that and name calling.
Of course you love big government as you've shown with the war on drugs. And after TDAK called you a white hating racist you now no longer went even legal immigration.
Your anomisity comes from not sharing the same racist beliefs you do. I'm glad you are afraid to say where you live because we know you live in the south and are a stain for such a great region of the country
cancel2 2022 (01-21-2018)
Bookmarks